Skip to main content
Log in

Testing hypotheses about direction of causation using cross-sectional family data

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We review the conditions under which cross-sectional family data (e.g., data on twin pairs or adoptees and their adoptive and biological relatives) are informative about direction of causation. When two correlated traits have rather different modes of inheritance (e.g., family resemblance is determined largely by family background for one trait and by genetic factors for the other trait), cross-sectional family data will allow tests of strong unidirectional causal hypotheses (A and B are correlated “because of the causal influence of A on B” versus “because of the causal influence of B on A”) and, under some conditions, also of the hypothesis of reciprocal causation. Possible sources of errors of inference are considered. Power analyses are reported which suggest that multiple indicator variables will be needed to ensure adequate power of rejecting false models in the presence of realistic levels of measurement error. These methods may prove useful in cases where conventional methods to establish causality, by intervention, by prospective study, or by measurement of instrumental variables, are infeasible economically, ethically or practically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, R. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization.Psychol. Rev. 75:81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989).Structural Equations with Latent Variables; John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslau, N. (1991). Nicotine dependence, major depression, and anxiety in young adults.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 48:1069–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. W., and Harris, T. O. (1978).Social Origins of Depression: A Study of Psychiatric Disorder in Women, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 37:1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. G. (1980).The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1963). From description to experimentation: Interpreting trends from quasi-experiments. In Harris, C. W. (ed.),Problems in Measuring Change, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 212–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, L. R., Fulker, D. W., and Joreskog, K. G. (1991). A LISREL model with constrained parameters for twin and adoptive families.Behav. Genet. 21:327–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, G. (1986). Sibling imitation and contrast effects.Behav. Genet. 16:319–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. W. (1981).Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach; Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. R., Rice, J., and Reich, T. (1979). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 31:178–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costner, H. L., and Schoenberg, R. (1973). Diagnosing indicator ills in multiple indicator models. In Goldberger, A. S., and Duncan, O. D. (eds.),Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, Seminar Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, D. A., and Martin, N. G. (1993). Inferring the direction of causation in cross-sectional twin data: Theoretical and empirical considerations.Genet. Epidemiol. (in press).

  • Duncan, O. D. (1969). Some linear models for two-wave, two-variable panel analysis.Psychol. Bull. 72:177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J. (1969). The genetic analysis or continuous variation: A comparison of experimental designs applicable to human data.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 23:131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J. (1970).Aspects of Human Psychogenetics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J. (1976). A model for siblings effects in man.Heredity 36:205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J. (1977). Interring the causes of human variation.J. Roy. Stat. Soc. A. 140:324–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., and Gale, J. S. (1974). A method for analyzing the genetic basis of covariation.Behav. Genet 4:253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., and Eysenck, H. J. (1975). The nature of extraversion: A genetical analysis.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 32:102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Eysenck, H., and Martin, N. G. (1989).Genes, Culture and Personality: An Empirical Approach, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Last, K. A., Martin, N. G., and Jinks, J. L. (1977). A progressive approach to non-additivity and genotype-environmental covariance in the analysis of human differences.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 30:1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Last, K. A., Young, P. A., and Martin, N. G. (1978). Model-fitting approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Heredity 41:249–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Heath, A. C., Neale, M. C., Hewitt, J. K., and Martin, N. G. (1992). Sex differences and non-additivity in the effects of genes on personality (unpublished manuscript).

  • Eisen, S. A., Goldberg, J., True, W., and Henderson, W. G. (1991). A cotwin-control study of the effects of the Vietnam war on the self-reported health of veterans.Am. J. Epidemiol. 134:49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S. (1960).Quantitative Genetics, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance.Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 53:399–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1958) Cancer and smoking.Nature 182:596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulker, D. W. (1982). Extensions of the classical twin method.Proceedings of the 1981 International Congress of Human Genetics, Jerusalem, Alan R. Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulker, D. W. (1988). Genetic and cultural transmission in human behavior. In Wier, B. S., Eisen, E. J., Goodman, M. M., and Namkoong, G. (eds.),Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulker, D. W., and DeFries, J. C. (1983). Genetic and environmental transmission in the Colorado Adoption Project: Path analysis.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 36:175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H. (1976).Modern Factor Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C. (1983).Human Quantitative Genetics: Some Issues and Applications, Unpublished D.Phil. dissertation, University of Oxford, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C. (1990). How twin data can resolve the direction of causation: PBI and depression in American twins. Presented at Vulnerability Factors in Neurosis: What Causes What Conference, University of New South Wales, Sept.

  • Heath, A. C. (1993). Genetic influences on drinking behavior in humans. In Begleiter, H., and Kissin B. (eds.),Alcohol and Alcoholism, Vol. 1, Genetic Factors and Alcoholism, Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1985). Resolving the effects of phenotype and social background on mate selection.Behav. Genet. 15:15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C., and Martin, N. G. (1991a). The inheritance of alcohol sensitivity and of patterns of alcohol use.Alcohol Alcohol.Suppl. 1:141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C., and Martin, N. G. (1991b). Intoxication after an acute dose of alcohol. An assessment of its association with alcohol consumption patterns by using twin data.Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 15:122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C., Kendler, K. S., Eaves, L. J., and Markell, D. (1985). The resolution of cultural and biological inheritance: Informativeness of different relationships.Behav. Genet. 15:439–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C., Neale, M. C., Hewitt, J. K., Eaves, L. J., and Fulker, D. W. (1989a). Testing structural equation models for twin data using LISREL.Behav. Genet. 19:9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C., Eaves, L. J., and Martin, N. G. (1989b). The genetic structure of personality III. Multivariate genetic item analysis of the EPQ scales.Personal. Indiv. Diff. 10:877–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C., Cates, R., Martin, N. G., Meyer, J., Hewitt, J. K., Neale, M. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1992). Genetic contribution to risk of smoking initiation: Comparisons across birth cohorts and across cultures (submitted for publication).

  • Jinks, J. L., and Fulker, D. W. (1970). Comparison of the biometrical, genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Psychol. Bull. 73:311–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. J. (1972).Econometric Methods, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. (1978). The structural analysis of covariance matrics.Psychometrika 43:443–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K., and Sorbom, D. (1988).LISREL VII: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships, Scientific Software, Mooresvill, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. S., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., and Eaves, L. J. (1987). Symptoms of anxiety and symptoms of depression: Same genes, different environments?Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 44:451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. S., Silberg, J. L., Neale, M. C., Kessler, R. C., Heath, A. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1991). The family history method: whose psychiatric history is measured?Am. J. Psychiat. 148:1501–1504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. S., Eaves, L. J., Neale, M. C., Heath, A. C., and Kessler, R. C. (1992). Smoking and depression: A causal analysis (submitted for publication).

  • Kenny, D. A. (1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness.Psychol. Bull. 82:887–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C. (1983). Methodological issues in the study of psychosocial stress. In Kaplan, H. B. (ed.),Psychosocial Stress: Trends in Theory and Research, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., and Greenberg, D. F. (1981).Linear Panel Analysis: Quantitative Models for Change, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Kendler, K. S., Heath, A. C., Neale, M. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1992). Social support, depressed mood, and adjustment to stress: A genetic epidemiologic investigation.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 62:257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, K. L., Westlake, J., and Spence, M. A. (1976). Extension to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method.Ann. Hum. Genet. 39:485–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locasio, J. J. (1982). The cross-lagged correlation technique: Reconsideration in terms of an exploratory utility, assumption specification and robustness.Educ. Psychol. Measure. 42:1023–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C. (1978). Heredity-environment analyses of I.Q. correlations.Behav. Genet. 26:415–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, J. J., and Goldsmith, H. H. (1990). Alternative common-factor models for multivariate biometric analyses.Behav. Genet. 12:467–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. G., and Eaves, L. J. (1977). The genetical analysis of covariance structure.Heredity 38:79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. G., and Heath, A. C. (1991). Parental bonding and depression: What causes what? Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Behavior Genetics Association, St. Louis, MO.

  • Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., Kearsey, M. J., and Davies, P. (1978). The power of the classical twin study.Heredity 40:97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. G., Oakeshott, J. G., Gibson, J. B., Starmer, G. A., Perl, J., and Wilks, A. V. (1985a). A twin study of psychomotor and physiological response to an acute dose of alcohol.Behav. Genet. 15:305–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. G., Perl, J., Oakeshott, J. G., Gibson, J. B., Starmer, G. A., and Wilks, A. V. (1985b). A twin study of ethanol metabolism.Behav. Genet. 15:93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K., and Jinks, J. L. (1971).Biometrical Genetics: The Study of Continuous Variation, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L., and Bielby, W. T. (1986). Statistical power in covariance structure models. In Tuma, N. B., (ed.),Sociological Methodology 1986, American Sociological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 120–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M. C., and Cardon, L. (1992).Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families, NATO ASI Series, Kluwer.

  • Neale, M. C., Heath, A. C., Hewitt, J. K., Eaves, L. J., and Fulker, D. W. (1989a). Fitting genetic models with LISREL: Hypothesis testing.Behav. Genet. 19:37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M., Hewitt, J. K., Heath, A. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1989b). The power of multivariate and categorical twin studies. Presented at the 6th International Congress of Twin Studies, Rome.

  • Neale, M. C., Walters, E., Health, A. C., Kessler, R. C., Perusse, D., Eaves, L. J., and Kendler, K. S. (1993). Depression and parental bonding: Cause, consequence, or genetic covariance?Genet. Epidemiol. (in press).

  • Parker, G. (1983).Parental Overprotection: A Risk Factor in Psychosocial Development, Grune & Stratton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. (1990). The Parental Bonding Instrument: Psychometric properties reviewed.Psychiat. Dev. 4:317–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, E. S., and Hartley, E. O. (1972).Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., and Bergeman, C. S. (1991). The nature of nurture: Genetic influence on environmental measures.Behav. Brain Sci. 84:309–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., and Loehlin, J. L. (1977). Genotype-environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human variation.Psychol. Bull. 84:309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J., Cloninger, C. R., and Reich, T. (1978). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. I. Description and basic properties of the unitary models.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 30:618–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogosa, D. A. (1980). A critique of cross-lagged correlation.Psychol. Bull. 88:245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., and Saris, W. E. (1985). Power of the likelihood-ratio test in covariance structure analysis.Psychometrika 50:83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieken, R. M., Eaves, L. J., Hewitt, J. K., Mosteller, M., Bodurtha, J. N., Moscowitz, W. B., and Nance, W. E. (1989). Univariate genetic analysis of blood pressure in children (The Medical College of Virginia Twin Study).Am. J. Cardiol. 64:1333–1337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1968).Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, K., and Kandel, D. B. (1984). Patterns of drug use from adolescence to adulthood. II. Sequences of progression.Am. J. Public Health 74:668–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow, L. J. (1963). Research in dimensions of early maternal care.Merrill-Palmer Q.9:101–114.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heath, A.C., Kessler, R.C., Neale, M.C. et al. Testing hypotheses about direction of causation using cross-sectional family data. Behav Genet 23, 29–50 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067552

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067552

Key Words

Navigation