Abstract
Subjects were required to read short passages of text while their eye movements were monitored. Each experimental passage contained a critical factive or nonfactive verb that was followed by a false complement. In half of the trials, subjects' reading was unimpaired; in the remainder of the trial, a central visual pattern mask, which moved in synchrony with the eyes, was applied. The results showed that (1) factive and nonfactive verbs did not receive different amounts of fixation time during the reading text. However, (2) false complements that followed factive verbs received longer fixation times than identical false complements that followed nonfactive verbs. On the basis of this, it is concluded that individual word characteristics, such as factivity, are encoded automatically while sentence interpretation requires effort to be completed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971).The American heritage word frequency book. New York: American Heritage.
Chaffin, R. (1979). Knowledge of language and knowledge about the world: A reaction time study of invited and necessary inferences.Cognitive Science, 3, 311–328.
Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977).Psychology and language. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Connine, C. (1983).Lexical category expectations in sentence comprehension. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Diego.
Cutler, A. (1983). Lexical complexity and sentence processing. In G. B. Jarvella (Ed.),The process of language understanding. New York: Wiley.
Ford, M., Bresnan, J., & Kaplan, R. (1983). A competence based theory of syntactic closure. In J. Bresnan (Ed.),The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Massachusetts M.I.T. Press.
Gordon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 24–44.
Inhoff, A. W. (1984). Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 612–624.
Inhoff, A. W., Lima, S. D., & Rayner, K. (1983).Word frequency in the processing of foveal and parafoveal information during eye fixations in reading. Paper presented at the 24th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Diego, California.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
Kirparsky, P., & Kirparsky, K. G. (1971). Fact. In D. D. Steinberg & L. A. Jacobovits (Eds.),Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rayner, K., Inhoff, A. W., Morrison, R. E., Slowiaczek, M., & Bertera, J. (1981). Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 167–179.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)Consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–660.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (Grant No. HD 17246), principal investigators Keith Rayner and Lyn Frazier. I would like to thank Chuck Clifton and Keith Rayner for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. I want especially to express my gratitude to Lyn Frazier for her help at all stages of the investigation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Inhoff, A.W. The effect of factivity on lexical retrieval and postlexical processes during eye fixations in reading. J Psycholinguist Res 14, 45–56 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067473
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067473