Skip to main content
Log in

The resolution of cultural and biological inheritance: Informativeness of different relationships

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The informativeness of different relationships for resolving the genetic and cultural transmission of a continuous variable is explored by computer simulation. Extended twin, extended nuclear-family, and adoption designs are considered. Combining data on twin and parent-offspring pairs provides a powerful means of detecting genetic and cultural transmission. The addition of uncle-nephew and first-cousin data sometimes leads to an increase in power. Designs involving monozygotic twin pairs and their offspring are weaker. The most powerful adoption designs involve data on both biological parent-adopted-away offspring and adoptive parent-adopted offspring pairs. In the absence of information about biological parents, combining nuclear-family, adoptive parent-adopted offspring, and adoptive/natural sibling relationships still provides a powerful strategy for hypothesis testing. Adoption designs are more robust than extended twin and extended nuclear-family designs for resolving cultural and biological inheritance in the presence of genetic dominance or phenotypic assortative mating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burks, B. S. (1928). The relative influence of nature and nurture upon mental development: A comparative study of foster parent-foster child resemblance and true parent-true child resemblance.Twenty-Seventh Yearbook Natl. Soc. Study Educ. 27:9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. (1973). Cultural versus biological inheritance: Phenotypic transmission from parents to child.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 25:618–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. (1981).Cultural Transmission and Evolution: a Quantitative Approach, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J..

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Feldman, M. W., Chen, K. H., and Dornbusch, S. M. (1982). Theory and observation in cultural transmission.Science 218:19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. R. (1980). Interpretation of intrinsic and extrinsic structural relations by path analysis: Theory and applications to assortative mating.Genet. Res. 36:135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. R., Rice, J., and Reich, T. (1979a). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. II. A general model of combined polygenic and cultural inheritance.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 31:176–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. R., Rice, J., and Reich, T. (1979b). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. III. Family structure and the analysis of experiments.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 31:366–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J. (1976a). A model for sibling effects in man.Heredity 36:205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J. (1976b). The effect of cultural transmission on continuous variation.Heredity 37:41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Last, K. A., Young, P. A., and Martin, N. G. (1978). Model-fitting approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Heredity 41:249–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance.Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 52:399–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1883).Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig, D. M. (1980).Optimisation, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayley, C. S., and Last, K. (1981). The advantages of analyzing human variation using twins and twin half-sibs and cousins.Heredity 47:221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C. (1983). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford.

  • Heath, A. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1985). Resolving the effects of phenotype and social background on mate selection.Behav. Genet. 15:15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. M., Loehlin, J. C., and Willerman, L. (1979) Intellectual resemblance among adoptive and biological relatives: The Texas adoption project.Behav. Genet. 9:177–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, J. L., and Fulker, D. W. (1970). Comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Psychol. Bull. 73:311–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices.Psychometrika 43:443–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, A. M. (1935). Nature-nurture and intelligence.Genet. Psychol. Monogr. 17:4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C. (1978). Heredity-environment analyses of Jenck's IQ correlations.Behav. Genet. 8:415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytton, H. (1977). Do parents create, or respond to, differences in twins?Dev. Psychol. 13:456–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., Kearsey, M. J., and Davies, P. (1978). The power of the classical twin study.Heredity 40:97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nance, W. E., and Corey, L. A. (1976). Genetic models for the analysis of data from the families of identical twins.Genetics 83:811–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, H. H., Freeman, F. N., and Holzinger, K. J. (1937).Twins: A Study of Heredity and Environment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numerical Algorithms Group (NAG) (1978).Fortran Library Manual, Mark 7, NAG, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, E. S., and Hartley, H. O. (Eds.) (1972).Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D. C., Morton, N. E., and Yee, S. (1976). Resolution of cultural and biological inheritance by path analysis.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 28:228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D. C., Morton, N. E., Elston, R. C., and Yee, S. (1977). Causal analysis of academic performance.Behav. Genet. 77:147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D. C., Morton, N. E., and Cloninger, C. R. (1979). Path analysis under generalized assortative mating. I. Theory.Genet. Res. 33:187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J., Cloninger, C. R., and Reich, T. (1978). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. I. Description and basic properties of the unitary models.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 30:618–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients.Ann. Math. Stat. 5:161–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1968).Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 1, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research reported in this paper was supported by Grants GM30250, GM32732, and AG04954 from the National Institutes of Health and by the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heath, A.C., Kendler, K.S., Eaves, L.J. et al. The resolution of cultural and biological inheritance: Informativeness of different relationships. Behav Genet 15, 439–465 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066238

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066238

Key Words

Navigation