Skip to main content
Log in

A latent structure analysis of delinquency

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses latent structure analysis to develop a construct of delinquency based on a set of frequently used indicators of illegal behavior. Other methods, such as Guttman scaling and factor analytic procedures, are briefly reviewed as similar attempts to identify manifest (observed) variables that may act as indicators of a latent (unobserved or unobservable) variable, delinquency. The basic mathematical properties of the latent structure model employed in this paper are presented and then applied to a set of six self-report measures. The issue of external validity is also examined in a comparative analysis of an additive scale of delinquency and the latent class measure of delinquency. The latent class measure provides a considerable increase in the magnitude of association with such commonly studied correlates as attachment, peer delinquency, and instrumental attitudes toward the law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, R. (1985). A revised strain theory of delinquency.Soc. Forces 64: 151–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. (1985).Deviant Behavior, Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C. (1977). Unrestricted and restricted maximum likelihood latent structure analysis: A manual for users. Working Paper No. 1977-09, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C. (1979). Some latent structure models for the analysis of Likert-type data.Soc. Sci. Res. 8: 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C. (1981). New developments in latent structure analysis. In Jackson, D. J. and Borgatta, E. F. (eds.),Factor Analysis and Measurement in Social Research, Sage, Beverly Hilis, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dentler, R. A., and Monroe, L. J. (1961). Early adolescent theft.Am. Sociol. Rev. 26: 733–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., and Ageton, S. S. (1980). Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., and Voss, H. (1974).Delinquency and Dropout, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1974). The analysis of systems of qualitative variables when some of the variables are unobservable.Am. J. Sociol. 79: 1179–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1975). A new model for scaling response patterns: An application of the quasi-independence concept.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 70: 755–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D. F. (1979).Mathematical Criminology, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S. J. (1979).Analysis of Qualitative Data, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., Gillis, A. R., and Simpson, J. (1985). The class structure of gender and delinquency.Am. J. Sociol. 90: 1151–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J. (1973). Causes of delinquency: A partial replication and extension.Soc. Problems 20: 471–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1981).Measuring Delinquency, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1984). A brief commentary on Akers' “Delinquent Behavior, Drugs, and Alcohol: What is the Relationship?”Today's Delinq. 3: 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., and Burke, P. (1980).Log-Linear Modeis, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P., and Henry, N. W. (1965).Latent Structure Analysis, Houghton-Mifflin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 498–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettler, G. (1984).Explaining Crime, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, F. I., and Short, J. F., Jr. (1957). Scaling delinquent behavior.Am. Sociol. Rev. 22: 326–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1968).The Logic of Survey Analysis, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellin, T., and Wolfgang, M. E. (1964).The Measurement of Delinquency, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, L. T. (1978). A longitudinal study of delinquency and crime. In Wellford, C. (ed.),Quantitative Studies in Criminology, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. G. (1983). Analyzing qualitative data. In Rossi, P. H.,et al. (eds.),Handbook of Survey Research, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. A. (1983). Evaluating diagnostic criteria: A latent class paradigm.J. Psychiat. Res. 17: 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brownfield, D., Sorenson, A.M. A latent structure analysis of delinquency. J Quant Criminol 3, 103–124 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064211

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064211

Key words

Navigation