Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical test of social control theory

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A test of social control theory was operated on a random sample of about 2000 juveniles aged 12 to 18 years. A second test was performed 2 years later on a subsample of the original one, taking into account changes in the life situation with respect to the family, school, work, leisure, peers, and some values connected with delinquency. Both self-report data and official data were collected. Using the HOMALS technique, scales were constructed of family integration (parental control, communication with parents, family activities, and family climate), school integration (liking school, commitment to school values, school performance, and social behavior), leisure and peers (nature and involvement in leisure activities, bravado), and some normative statements. Changes in social integration were measured over a period of 2 years and compared to the impact of official intervention in delinquency cases by police or prosecutor. On the basis of path analysis and a LISREL model, we were able to conclude that there was no impact of police or prosecutor intervention on later delinquency, but there appeared to be a strong and inverse relationship between changes in social integration, or the bond with society, and the frequency of offending.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briar, S., and Piliavin, I. (1965). Delinquency, situational inducements and commitment to conformity.Soc. Problems 13: 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloward, R. A., and Ohlin, L. E. (1960).Delinquency and Opportunity-A Theory of Delinquent Gangs, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (1955).Delinquent Boys, the Culture of the Gang, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. R. (1960). The theory of differential association: An introduction.Soc. Problems 8.

  • Elliott, D. S., and Voss, H. L. (1974).Delinquency and Dropouts, Heath, Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifi, A. (1980).Non-linear Multivariate Analysis, University of Leiden, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, Sh., and Glueck, E. (1950).Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman, R. W., and Cats, P. F. (1974). De ontwikkeling van de jeugdcriminaliteit in Nederland van 1950–1970.Nederlands Tijdschrift Criminal. 16: 154–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger-Tas, J. (1977). Hidden delinquency and judicial selection in Belgium. In Friday, P. C., and Lorne Stewart, V. (eds.),Youth Crime and Juvenile Justice, Praeger, New York, pp. 70–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger-Tas, J., and Block, R. L. (eds.) (1988).Juvenile Delinquency in the Netherlands, Kugler, Amstelveen and Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger-Tas, J., Junger, M., Barendse-Hoornweg, E., and Sampiemon, M. (1983).Jeugddelinquentie-Achtergronden en justitiële reactie, WODC, Staatsuitgeverij, 's-Gravenhage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger-Tas, J., Junger, M., and Barendse-Hoornweg, E. (1985).Jeugddeliquentie II-De invloed van justitieel ingrijpen, WODC, Staatsuitgeverij, 's-Gravenhage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matza, D. (1964).Delinquency and Drift, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijerink, F., van der Heijden, P. G. M., and Mooyaart, A. (1985).Using L1SREL to Choose Between Contradicting Criminological Theories, Department of Research Methods, University of Leiden, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polk, H., and Schafer, W. E. S. (eds.) (1972).Schools and Delinquency, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckless, W. C. (1961). A new theory of delinquency of crime.Fed. Probat. 25: 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., and Ouston, J. (1979).Fifteen Thousand Hours-Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children, Open Books, Somerset.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, J. J. M., and Junger-Tas, J. (1988). Trends in crime. In Hope, T., and Shaw, M. (eds.),Communities and Crime Reduction, Home Office Research and Planning Unit, London, pp. 260–277.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on two Dutch research reports, which have been published in English inJuvenile Delinquency in the Netherlands (Junger-Tas and Block, 1988).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Junger-Tas, J. An empirical test of social control theory. J Quant Criminol 8, 9–28 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062757

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062757

Key words

Navigation