Skip to main content
Log in

Academic and environmental effects of small group arrangements in classrooms for students with autism and other developmental disabilities

  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of small group instructional formats with children who have autism and developmental disabilities has received mixed results in the research literature (Reid & Favell, 1984). The purpose of the two studies reported herein was to address this controversy by comparing the performance of students in one-to-one instruction to those transitioned to small groups for a variety of teachers, students, settings, and under different training circumstances. In the first study, 41 students, ranging in age from 5 to 21 years old, from six classrooms, participated; and 25 students from six classrooms participated in the second study. Measures of environmental effects included academic gains via pre- and posttests, on-task and self-stimulatory behavior levels, correct responding, and frequencies of teacher behaviors during both one-to-one and small group formats. Results of both experiments indicated that students were able to successfully transition to small group formats across several curriculum areas including language, math, readiness, and shopping. Further, experienced teachers and administrators were able to train a second group of staff to use the small group procedures effectively. The successful application for this number of students and teachers within natural learning environments is unprecedented and provides important documentation for both the utility and practicality of small group instruction with students who have developmental disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., Nietupski, J., & Hamre-Nietupski, S. (1976). Criterion of ultimate functioning. In M. A. Thomas (Ed.),Hey don't forget about me (pp. 1–15). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., Pumpian, I., Baumgart, D., Vandeventer, P., Ford, A., Nisbet, J., Schroeder, J., & Gruenewald, L. (1981). Longitudinal transition plans in programs for severely handicapped students.Exceptional Children, 47, 624–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. C., & Stanley, J. C. (1963).Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A. (1988). Statistics for small groups: The power of the pretest.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11, 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favell, J. E., Favell, J. E., & McGimsey, J. F. (1978). Relative effectiveness and efficiency of group versus individual training of severely retarded persons.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 104–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankosky, R. J., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1978). Individual and group contingencies and collateral social behaviors.Behavior Therapy, 9, 313–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamps, D., Walker, D., Locke, P., Delquadri, J. & Hall, R. V. (1990). A comparison of one-to-one instruction by peers, one-to-one instruction by adults, and small group instruction with children with autism.Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 197–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1982).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R., Egel, A. L., & Dunlap, G. (1980). Learning characteristics of autistic children. In W. Sailor, B. Wilcox, & L. Brown (Eds.),Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students (pp. 259–301). Baltimore MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., & Rincover, A. (1974). Treatment of psychotic children in a classroom environment: I. Learning in a large group.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, M. A., Nordquist, V. M., Twardosz, S., Heckman, K. A., Wehby, J. H. & Denny, R. K. (1988). Promoting autistic children's peer interaction in an integrated early childhood setting using affection activities.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, M. E., Pearson, A., Fenrick, N. & Greene, D. (1988). The implementation of sample, delay techniques to enhance the language of delayed children in group settings.Journal of the Division of Early Childhood, 12, 342–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, C. A. (1985). Increasing opportunities for social control by children with autism and severe handicaps: Effects on student behavior and perceived classroom climate.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 10, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polloway, E. A., Cronin, M. E., & Patton, J. R. (1986). The efficacy of group versus one-to-one instruction: A review.Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. H., & Favell, J. E. (1984). Group instruction with persons who have severe disabilities: A critical review.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 9, 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincover, A., & Koegel, R. L. (1977). Classroom treatment of autistic children: II. Individualized instruction in a group.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5, 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepis, M. M., Reid, D. H., & Fitzgerald, J. R. (1987). Group instruction with profoundly retarded persons: Acquisition, generalization, and maintenance of a remunerative work skill.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984).Single subject research in special education. Colombus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. (1986).A review of the literature on the use of group instruction with students who have autism and other developmental disabilities. Unpublished manuscript, Juniper Gardens Children's Project, Bureau of Child Research, University of Kansas.

  • Whorton, D. M., Walker, D., McGrale, J., Rotholz, D., & Locke, P. (1988).Alternative instructional strategies for students with autism and other developmental disabilities: Peer tutoring and group teaching procedures. Austin, TX: Pro Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. E., & Cuvo, A. J. (1986). Training apartment upkeep skills to rehabilitation clients: A comparison of task analytic strategies.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by Grant G008300068 from the U.S. Department of Education. The authors wish to express appreciation to administrators, teachers, and students in the Kansas City, Ks and Kansas City, Mo Public School Districts and to the Sherwood Center for Exceptional Children, Inc. for their participation and support. The research reported herein was based in part on the Doctoral Dissertation of the second author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamps, D., Walker, D., Maher, J. et al. Academic and environmental effects of small group arrangements in classrooms for students with autism and other developmental disabilities. J Autism Dev Disord 22, 277–293 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01058156

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01058156

Keywords

Navigation