Abstract
A preliminary statement of a theoretical framework integrating psychological and societal determinants of justice in human affairs is presented. It is proposed that the social structure provides the rules of entitlement and decision making that regulate the course of routine social interaction. These societally based norms are representable in people's conscious thought processes. By contrast, the psychologically generated rules of entitlement, typically contradict conventionally accepted rules of thought and discourse and thus remain “unconscious.” The major part of the discussion considers the motivationally important circumstances that engage the unconscious psychologically compelling determinants and how their appearance in behavior is both shaped and legitimized by the situationally prevailing normative context. The final section considers some of the more important methodological, theoretical, and social policy implications of this social psychological theory of entitlements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asch, S. E. (1952).Social Psychology Prentice-Hall, New York.
Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977).Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach Elsevier, New York.
Berscheid, E., and Cambell, B. (1981). The changing longevity of heterosexual close relationships: A commentary and forecast, Chap. 10. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior Plenum Press, New York.
Blau, P. M. (1964).Exchange and Power in Social Life Wiley, New York.
Bowers, K. S., and Meichenbaum, D. (1984).The Unconscious Reconsidered John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Carlsmith, J. M., and Gross, A. E. (1969). Some effects of guilt on compliance.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 11: 232–239.
Cook, T. D., Crosby, F., and Hennigan, K. M. (1977). The construct validity of relative deprivations. In Suls, J. M., and Miller, R. M. (eds.),Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives Hemisphere Corp., Washington, DC.
Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egotistical relative deprivation.Psychol. Rev. 83: 85–113.
Deutsch, M. (1982). Interdependence and psychological orientation, Chap. 1. In Derlega, V. J., and Grzelak, J. (eds.),Cooperation and Helping Behavior Academic Press, New York.
Ellard, J. M. (1983). An exploratory study of the “Existential Charade.” Unpublished master's thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo.
Folger, R. (1984). Emerging issues in the social psychology of justice. In Folger R. (ed.),The Sense of Injustice: Social Psychological Perspectives Plenum Press, New York, pp. 3–24.
Freedman, J. L. (1970). Transgression, compliance, and guilt. In Macaulay J., and Berkowitz, L. (eds.),Altruism and Helping Behavior Academic Press, New York.
Festinger, L. L. (1957).A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL.
Flavell, J. H. (1977).Cognitive Development Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement.Am. Sociol. Rev. 25: 161–178.
Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L., (1982). Why justice: Normative and instrumental interpretations. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior Academic Press, New York, pp. 437–470.
Heider, F. (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Hogan, R., and Emler, N. P. (1981).Retributive Justice, Chap. 7. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds.),Justice Motive in Social Behavior Plenum Press. New York.
Homans, G. C. (1961).Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.
Karniol, R., and Miller, D. T. (1981). Morality and the development of conceptions of justice. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior Plenum Press, New York.
Kidder, L. H., Belletrie, G., and Cohen, S. E. (1977). Sectet ambitions and public performances.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 13: 70–80.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. (ed.),Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research Rand McNally, New York.
Kruglanski, A. (1980). Lay epistomo-logic-process and contents: Another look at attribution theory.Psychol. Rev. 87: 70–87.
Kubler-Ross, E. (1969).On Death and Dying Macmillan, New York.
Langer, E. J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In Harvey, J., Ickes, W., and Kidd, R. (eds.),New Directions in Attribution Theory, Vol. 2, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms.J. Pers. 45: 1–52.
Lerner, M. J. (1980).The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion Plenum Press, New York.
Lerner, M. J. (1981). Justice motive in human relations: Some thoughts on what we know and need to know about justice. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds.),Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Times of Scarcity and Change Plenum Press, New York.
Lerner, M. J. (1982). Justice motive in human relations and the economic model of man. In Derlega, V., and Grzelak, J. (eds.),Cooperation and Helping Behavior Academic Press, New York.
Lerner, M. J., and Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: looking back and ahead.Psychol. Bull. 85: 1030–1051.
Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., and Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving vs. justice: A contemporary dilemma. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York.
Lerner, S. C. (1979). Behavior in the crunch.Alternatives 8: 2.
Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. (1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases, Chap. 4. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.),Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives Praeger, New York.
Milgrams, S. (1974).Obedience to Authority Harper & Row, New York.
Meindl, J. R., and Lerner, M. J. (1983). The heroic motive: Some experimental demonstrations.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 19: 1–20.
Miller, D. T. (1975). Personal deserving versus justice for others: An exploration of the justice motive. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo.
Miller, D. T. (1977). Personal deserving versus justice for others.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 13: 1–13.
Nisbett, R. E., and Ross, L. (1980).Human Inferences: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Piaget, J. (1965).The Moral Judgment of the Child Free Press, New York.
Ross, L. D. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10, Academic Press, New York.
Rubin, Z., and Peplau, A. (1975). Who believes in a just world?J. Soc. Issues 13: 65–89.
Ryan, W. (1971).Blaming the Victim Pantheon Press, New York.
Sampson, E. (1975). On justice as equality.J. Soc. Issues 31: 45–64.
Schelling, T. (1978).Micromotives and Macrobehavior Norton, New York.
Shweder, R. A., and Miller, J. G., (1985). The social construction of the person: How is it possible? In Gergen, K. J., and Davis, K. E. (eds.),The Social Construction of the Person Springer-Verlag, New York.
Simmons, C. P. (1981). Theoretical issues in the development of social justice. Chap. 3. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds.),Justice Motive in Social Behavior Plenum Press, New York.
Simons, C. W., and Piliavin, J. A. (1972). The effect of deception on reactions to a victim.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 21: 56–60.
Thibaut, J., and Kelley, H. H. (1959).The Social Psychology of Groups John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Walster, E., and Walster, G. W. (1975). Equity and social justice.J. Soc. Issues 31: 21–44.
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978).Equity: Theory and Research Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
Werner, H. (1948).Comparative Psychology of Mental Development International Press, New York.
Zuckerman, M. (1975). Belief in a just world and altruistic behavior.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 31: 972–976.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lerner, M.J. Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and fundamental problem for the social sciences. Soc Just Res 1, 107–125 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049386
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049386