Abstract
This study examines discourse cohesion in young normal, specifically language-impaired, and autistic children. The Halliday and Hasan (1976) approach was applied to investigate cohesion strategies used in interactive discourse by 10 autistic, 8 specifically language-impaired, and 8 normal children matched for language age (MLU, receptive vocabulary and syntax). The following questions were investigated: (a) Do all three groups use the same cohesion strategies in their discourse, and if so, do they use these strategies with the same rate and with the same patterning? (b) What can be said with respect to the errors the individual groups make? Results showed that all three groups used the same cohesion strategies. All groups were similar in patterning. Significant group differences were found in the overall rate of correct use and in the use of individual cohesive ties. The groups also differed significantly in overall error rates, and error rates related to individual tie categories. Results are discussed from the perspective of possible variables contributing to group differences. Frequency of occurrence in natural discourse is discussed in terms of specific cohesive strategies used by the children.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, C., & Bishop, D. V. M. (1989). Conversational characteristics of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder. I: Exchange structure, turntaking, repairs and cohesion.British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 24, 211–239.
American Psychiatric Association (1980)Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Ball, J. (1978).A pragmatic analysis of autistic children's language with respect to aphasic and normal language development. Unpublished honors thesis, Melbourne University.
Baltaxe, C. A. M. (1977). Pragmatic deficits in the language of autistic adolescents.Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2, 176–180.
Baltaxe, C. A. M. (1984). Use of contractive stress in normal, aphasic, and autistic children.Journal of Speech and hearing Research, 27, 97–104.
Baltaxe, C. A. M., & Simmons, J. Q. (1981). Disorders of language in childhood psychosis: Current concepts and approaches. In J. Darby (Ed.),Speech evaluations in psychiatry (pp. 285–328). New York: Grune & Stratton.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive as affective?Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 379–403.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1989a). Perceptual role-taking and protodeclarative pointing in autism.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 113–127.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1989b). The autistic child's theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–297.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Firth, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’?Cognition, 21, 37–46.
Beisler, J., & Tsai, L. (1983). A pragmatic approach to increase expressive language skills in young autistic children.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 13, 287–303.
Carrow, E. (1978).Test of auditory comprehension of language. Austin, TX: Urban Research Group.
Chapman, R. (1981). Computing mean length of utterance in morphemes. In J. Miller (Ed.),Assessing language production in children (pp. 22–27). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Chaika, R., & Lambe, R. A. (1989). Cohesion in schizophrenic narratives, revisited.Journal of Communication Disorders, 22, 407–421.
Clancy, P. (1980). Referential cohesion in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W. Chafe (Ed.) “The Pear Stories,” inAdvances in discourse process (pp. 127–202) Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Doll, E. A. (1965).Vineland Social Maturity Scale. Minneapolis, MN: American Guidance Service.
Dubois, J. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity.Language, 63, 805–855.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981).Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Minneapolis, MN: Child Guidance Clinic.
Griffith, P. L., Ripich, D. N., & Dastoli, S. L. (1986). Story structure, cohesion, and propositions in story recalls by learning-disabled and nondisabled children.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 539–555.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976).Cohesion in English. London: Logman.
Harvey, P., Weintraub, S., & Neale, J. (1982). Speech competence in children vulnerable to psychopathology.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 373–388.
Layton, T., & Stutts, N. (1986). Pragmatic usage by autistic children under different treatment modes.Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 13, 127–152.
Leaper, C., & Emmorey, K. (1985). The discourse of schizophrenic children.Brain and language, 25, 72–86.
Liles, B. (1985). Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language disordered children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 123–133.
Liles, B. (1987). Episode organization and cohesive conjunctives in narratives of children with and without language disorder.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 185–196.
Liles, B., Coehlo, C. A., Duffy, R. J., & Zalagens, M. R. (1989). Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head-injured adults.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 356–366.
Loveland, K. A., McEvoy, Tunali, B., & Kelley, M. L. (1990). Narrative story telling in autism and Down's syndrome.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 9–23.
Mentis, M., & Prutting, C. A. (1987). Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 88–98.
Miller, J. (1981).Assessing language production in children, experimental procedures. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Prizant, B., & Duchan, J. (1981). The functions of immediate echolalia in autistic children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 241–249.
Prizant, B., & Rydell, P. (1984). Analysis of functions of delayed echolalia in autistic children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 183–192.
Ripich, D. N., & Terrell, B. Y. (1988). Patterns of discourse cohesion and coherence in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 8–15.
Rochester, S., & Martin, J. (1979).Crazy talk: A study in the discourse of schizophrenic speakers. New York: Plenum Press.
Rochester, S., Martin, J., & Thurston, S. (1977). Thought process disorder in schizophrenia: The listener's task.Brain and Language, 4, 95–114.
Rommetveit, R. (1974).On message structure. London: Wiley.
Terman, L., & Merrill, M. (1972).Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Watson, L. (1987). Pragmatic abilities and disabilities of autistic children. In T. L. Layton (Ed.),Language and treatment of autistic and developmentally disordered children (pp. 87–127). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NINCDS Grant No. NS 16479, and Developmental Disabilities Grant No. 59P-45912-14, Maternal Child Health No. 927-19, and SHARE. We thank Jeffrey Gornbein, UCLA Department of Biomathematics, for his statistical assistance and Elizabeth Teas-Hester and Elizabeth Weber for their constructive criticisms.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baltaxe, C.A.M., D'Angiola, N. Cohesion in the discourse interaction of autistic, specifically language-impaired, and normal children. J Autism Dev Disord 22, 1–21 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046399
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046399