Skip to main content
Log in

Cohesion in the discourse interaction of autistic, specifically language-impaired, and normal children

  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines discourse cohesion in young normal, specifically language-impaired, and autistic children. The Halliday and Hasan (1976) approach was applied to investigate cohesion strategies used in interactive discourse by 10 autistic, 8 specifically language-impaired, and 8 normal children matched for language age (MLU, receptive vocabulary and syntax). The following questions were investigated: (a) Do all three groups use the same cohesion strategies in their discourse, and if so, do they use these strategies with the same rate and with the same patterning? (b) What can be said with respect to the errors the individual groups make? Results showed that all three groups used the same cohesion strategies. All groups were similar in patterning. Significant group differences were found in the overall rate of correct use and in the use of individual cohesive ties. The groups also differed significantly in overall error rates, and error rates related to individual tie categories. Results are discussed from the perspective of possible variables contributing to group differences. Frequency of occurrence in natural discourse is discussed in terms of specific cohesive strategies used by the children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, C., & Bishop, D. V. M. (1989). Conversational characteristics of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder. I: Exchange structure, turntaking, repairs and cohesion.British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 24, 211–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1980)Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, J. (1978).A pragmatic analysis of autistic children's language with respect to aphasic and normal language development. Unpublished honors thesis, Melbourne University.

  • Baltaxe, C. A. M. (1977). Pragmatic deficits in the language of autistic adolescents.Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2, 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltaxe, C. A. M. (1984). Use of contractive stress in normal, aphasic, and autistic children.Journal of Speech and hearing Research, 27, 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltaxe, C. A. M., & Simmons, J. Q. (1981). Disorders of language in childhood psychosis: Current concepts and approaches. In J. Darby (Ed.),Speech evaluations in psychiatry (pp. 285–328). New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive as affective?Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 379–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1989a). Perceptual role-taking and protodeclarative pointing in autism.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1989b). The autistic child's theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Firth, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’?Cognition, 21, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beisler, J., & Tsai, L. (1983). A pragmatic approach to increase expressive language skills in young autistic children.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 13, 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrow, E. (1978).Test of auditory comprehension of language. Austin, TX: Urban Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. (1981). Computing mean length of utterance in morphemes. In J. Miller (Ed.),Assessing language production in children (pp. 22–27). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaika, R., & Lambe, R. A. (1989). Cohesion in schizophrenic narratives, revisited.Journal of Communication Disorders, 22, 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, P. (1980). Referential cohesion in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W. Chafe (Ed.) “The Pear Stories,” inAdvances in discourse process (pp. 127–202) Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, E. A. (1965).Vineland Social Maturity Scale. Minneapolis, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, J. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity.Language, 63, 805–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981).Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Minneapolis, MN: Child Guidance Clinic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, P. L., Ripich, D. N., & Dastoli, S. L. (1986). Story structure, cohesion, and propositions in story recalls by learning-disabled and nondisabled children.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 539–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976).Cohesion in English. London: Logman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P., Weintraub, S., & Neale, J. (1982). Speech competence in children vulnerable to psychopathology.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 373–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, T., & Stutts, N. (1986). Pragmatic usage by autistic children under different treatment modes.Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 13, 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C., & Emmorey, K. (1985). The discourse of schizophrenic children.Brain and language, 25, 72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liles, B. (1985). Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language disordered children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liles, B. (1987). Episode organization and cohesive conjunctives in narratives of children with and without language disorder.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liles, B., Coehlo, C. A., Duffy, R. J., & Zalagens, M. R. (1989). Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head-injured adults.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveland, K. A., McEvoy, Tunali, B., & Kelley, M. L. (1990). Narrative story telling in autism and Down's syndrome.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentis, M., & Prutting, C. A. (1987). Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 88–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1981).Assessing language production in children, experimental procedures. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prizant, B., & Duchan, J. (1981). The functions of immediate echolalia in autistic children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 241–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prizant, B., & Rydell, P. (1984). Analysis of functions of delayed echolalia in autistic children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripich, D. N., & Terrell, B. Y. (1988). Patterns of discourse cohesion and coherence in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochester, S., & Martin, J. (1979).Crazy talk: A study in the discourse of schizophrenic speakers. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochester, S., Martin, J., & Thurston, S. (1977). Thought process disorder in schizophrenia: The listener's task.Brain and Language, 4, 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommetveit, R. (1974).On message structure. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L., & Merrill, M. (1972).Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, L. (1987). Pragmatic abilities and disabilities of autistic children. In T. L. Layton (Ed.),Language and treatment of autistic and developmentally disordered children (pp. 87–127). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by NINCDS Grant No. NS 16479, and Developmental Disabilities Grant No. 59P-45912-14, Maternal Child Health No. 927-19, and SHARE. We thank Jeffrey Gornbein, UCLA Department of Biomathematics, for his statistical assistance and Elizabeth Teas-Hester and Elizabeth Weber for their constructive criticisms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baltaxe, C.A.M., D'Angiola, N. Cohesion in the discourse interaction of autistic, specifically language-impaired, and normal children. J Autism Dev Disord 22, 1–21 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046399

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046399

Keywords

Navigation