Abstract
A measure of comfort with touching was found to predict whether or not subjects would volunteer to participate in an experiment involving hugging strangers of both sexes and also to predict levels of personal space. Among those volunteering to give hugs, subjects reporting greater comfort with touch rated those hugs more positively, but this seemed to reflect a readiness to interpret touch positively rather than any clear differences in the nature of the hug actually given. Earlier findings that women report greater comfort with touch than do men were replicated. It was found that reported touch comfort was directly related to such constructs as satisfaction with life, with oneself, and with one's childhood, as well as to self-confidence, assertiveness, socially acceptable self-presentation, and active rather than passive modes of coping with problems. Touch comfort was inversely related to expressed concerns with touches which might reflect status differentials, homosexuality, or negative affective states. It was concluded that the touch comfort construct reflects the degree of one's openness to expressing intimate behavior, the degree to which one adopts an active, rather than passive, interpersonal style, and the degree to which one's social relationships are satisfactory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, P.A. & Leibowitz, K. (1978). The development and nature of the construct touch avoidance.Environmental Psychology & Nonverbal Behavior, 3, 89–106.
Andersen, J.F., Andersen, P.A. & Lustig, M.W. (1987). Opposite sex touch avoidance: A national replication and extension.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 89–109.
Andersen, P.A. & Sull, K.K. (1985). Out of touch, out of reach: Tactile predispositions as predictors of interpersonal distance.Western Journal of Speech Communication.49, 57–72.
Argyle, M. & Dean, J. (1965). Eye contact, distance, and affiliation.Sociometry, 28, 289–304.
Brockner, J., Pressman, B., Cabitt, J., & Moran, P. (1982). Nonverbal intimacy, sex, and compliance: A field study.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 6, 253–258.
Burgoon, J.K., Buller, D.B., Hale, J.L., & deTurck, M. (1984). Relational messages associated with nonverbal behavior.Human Communication Research 10, 351–378.
Carver, C.S. & Scheier, M.F. (1981).Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Dahlstrom, W.G. & Welsh, G.S. (1960).An MMPI handbook: A guide to use in clinical practice and research. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Deethardt, J.F. & Hines, D.G. (1983). Tactile communication and personality differences.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 143–156.
Edwards, A.L. (1957).The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden Press.
Edwards, D.J.A. (1984). The experience of interpersonal touch during a personal growth program: A factor analytic approach.Human Relations, 37, 769–780.
Fromme, D.K. & Beam, D.C. (1974). Dominance and sex differences in nonverbal responses to differential eye contact.Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 76–87.
Fromme, D.K., Cervantes, R.C., & Jaynes, W.E. (1985).The Oklahoma Personal Style Inventory. Unpublished manuscript.
Fromme, D.K., Fromme, M.L., Brown, S., Daniell, J., Taylor, D.K. & Rountree, J.R. (1986). Attitudes toward touch: Cross-validation and the effects of gender and acquaintanceship.Rassegna di Psicologia, 3, 49–63.
Fromme, D.K. & Jaynes, W.E. (1986).On the factorial structure of the California Psychological Inventory Socialization and Dominance scales. Unpublished manuscript.
Goldman, M. & Fordyce, J. (1983). Prosocial behavior as affected by eye contact, touch, and voice expression.Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 125–129.
Gough, H.G. (1956).The California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Hoddinott, E. & Follingstad, D.R. (1983). Effects of instruction set and personality variables on the use of touching.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 299–309.
Jones, W.H. & Russell, D. (1982). The social reticence scale: An objective instrument to measure shyness.Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 629–631.
Jourard, S.M. (1966). An exploratory study of body accessibility.British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 5, 221–231.
Jourard, S.M. & Rubin, J.E. (1968) Self-disclosure and touching: A study of two modes of interpersonal encounter and their interrelation.Journal of Sex Research, 20, 264–278.
Larsen, K.S. & LeRoux, J. (1984). A study of same sex touching attitudes: Scale development and personality predictors.The Journal of Sex Research,,20, 264–278.
Major, B. & Heslin, R. (1982). Perception of cross-sex and same-sex nonreciprocal touch: It is better to give than to receive.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 148–162.
Russell, D., Peplau, L.A., & Cutrona, C.E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.
Silverman, A.F., Pressman, M.E., & Bartel, H.W. (1973). Self-esteem and tactile communication.Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 13, 73–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fromme, D.K., Jaynes, W.E., Taylor, D.K. et al. Nonverbal behavior and attitudes toward touch. J Nonverbal Behav 13, 3–14 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006469
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006469