Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between goal specificity and task performance, with specificity operationalized as a continuous quantitative variable reflecting the range of performance levels individuals chose as their personal goals. It was hypothesized that, controlling for goal difficulty, specific personal goals would be associated with higher levels of task performance. It was also hypothesized that task strategy would mediate the relationship between goal specificity and performance and that specific goals would be associated with smaller goal-performance discrepancies. The results from a sample of 162 college students working on an eye-hand coordination task supported the hypothesis concerning goal-performance discrepancies. They hypotheses regarding task strategy and the relationship between goal specificity and performance were supported only on the second of two trials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ammons, R. B. (1956). Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation.Journal of General Psychology, 54 279–299.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist, 37 122–147.
Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. G. (1983). A meta-model of the effects of goal characteristics, feedback, and role characteristics in human organizations.Human Relations, 36 151–166.
Campion, M. A., & Lord, R. G. (1982). A control systems conceptualization of the goal setting and changing process.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30 265–287.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981).Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Earley, P. C., & Perry, B. C. (1987). Work plan availability and performance: An assessment of task strategy priming on subsequent task completion.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39 279–302.
Earley, P. C., Wojnaroski, P., & Prest, W. (1987). Task planning and energy expended: An exploration of how goals influence performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72 104–114.
Frost, P. J., & Mahoney, T. A. (1976). Goal setting and the task process I. An interactive influence on individual performance.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17 328–350.
Goldstein, I. L. (1986).Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Hollenbeck, J. R., & Brief, A. P. (1987). The effects of individual differences and goal origin on the goal setting process.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40 392–414.
Hollenbeck, J. R., & Klein, H. J. (1987). Goal commitment and the goal setting process: Problems, prospects and proposals for future research.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72 212–220.
Hollenbeck, J. R., Williams, C. R., & Klein, H. J. (1989). An empirical investigation of the antecedents of goal commitment.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 18–23.
James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 307–321.
Klein, H. J. (1989). Performance goals and performance feedback as dual motivational elements: An integrated control theory model of work motivation.Academy of Management Review, 14 150–172.
Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3 157–189.
Locke, E. A. & Bryan, J. F. (1968). Grade goals as determinants of academic achievement.Journal of General Psychology, 79 217–228.
Locke, E. A., Chah, D., Harrison, S., & Lustgarten, N. (1989). Separating the effects of goal specificity from goal difficulty.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43 270–287.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990).A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Locke E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980.Psychological Bulletin, 90 125–152.
Lord, R. G., & Hanges, P. J. (1987). A control systems model of organizational motivation: Theoretical development and applied implications.Behavioral Science, 32 161–178.
Mento, A. J., Steel, R. P., & Karren, R. J. (1987). A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966–1984.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39 52–83.
Naylor, J. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1984). Goal setting: A theoretical analysis of a motivational technology.Research in Organizational Behavior, 6 95–140.
Naylor, J. D., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980).A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press.
Riedel, J. A., Nebeker, D. M. & Cooper, B. L. (1988). The influence of monetary incentives on goal choice, goal commitment, and task performance.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42 155–180.
Smith, K. G., Locke, E. A., & Barry, D. (1990). Goal setting, planning and organizational performance: An experimental simulation.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46 118–134.
Taylor, M. S., Fisher, C. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1984). Individuals' reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective.Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 2 81–124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to thank Marybeth DeGregorio, David McKellin, and Jillian Shapiro for their valuable input and assistance with this study and Edwin Locke, Patrick Wright, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klein, H.J., Whitener, E.M. & Ilgen, D.R. The role of goal specificity in the goal-setting process. Motiv Emot 14, 179–193 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995568
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995568