Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of facial control and facial mimicry on subjective reactions to comedy routines

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of facial control on subjective reactions to dubbed (created with inserts of smiling people) and undubbed comedy routines was examined. The presence of dubs increased EMG activity over thezygomaticus major andorbicularis oculi muscle regions for spontaneous-condition subjects, but not for inhibit-condition subjects. Analyses also showed that spontaneous-condition subjects exhibited increased smiling at dub points, a finding that is consistent with the notion that subjects mimicked the inserted facial displays. Self-report findings revealed that spontaneous-condition subjects reported significantly greater amusement to the dubbed compared with the undubbed routines, whereas inhibit-condition subjects' self-reports of amusement did not differentiate dub conditions. Furthermore, spontaneous-condition subjects reported significantly more amusement to the dubbed routines than did inhibit-condition subjects. Despite strong facial control effects on facial EMG activity, no main effect of facial condition on self-reported amusement was found, and therefore, the data provide no support for a general version of facial feedback theory. The data are consistent with the view that mimetic responses enhanced subjective reactions, and they are compatible with the Leventhal and Tomkins versions of facial feedback theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ax, A. (1953). The physiological differentiation between fear and anger in humans.Psychosomatic Medicine, 15 433–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1986). “I show how you feel”: Motor mimicry as a communicative act.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 322–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, L. K., Hess, U., & Wolford, G. (1988). The effects of transformations on psychophysiological data: A Monte Carlo investigation.Psychophysiology, 25 438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, L. K., McHugo, G. J., & Lanzetta, J. T. (1986). The effects of sex and prior attitude on emotional reactions to expressive displays of political leaders.Psychophysiology, 23 427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo. J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Attitudes and cognitive response: An electrophysiological approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 2181–2199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Losch, M. E., & Kim, H. (1986). Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 260–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Sandman, C. A. (1978). Physiological differentiation of sensory and cognitive tasks as a function of warning, processing demands and reported unpleasantness.Biological Psychology, 6 181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, K. (1968). Physiological arousal as a function of imagined, vicarious, and direct stress.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73 513–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, K., & Wood, K. (1969). Physiological differentiation of direct and vicarious affective arousal.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupchick, G., & Leventhal, H. (1974). Consistency between expressive behavior and the evaluation of humorous stimuli: The role of sex and self-observation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 429–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U. (1982). Facial reactions to facial expressions.Psychophysiology, 19 643–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U. (1986). Facial expressions as excitatory and imhibitory stimuli for conditioned autonomic responses.Biological Psychology, 22 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1981). Mistakes when deceiving.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 364 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W., & O'Sullivan, M. (1988). Smiles when lying.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 414–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Levenson, R., & Friesen, W. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions.Sciences, 221 1208–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englis, B. G., Vaughan, K. B., & Lanzetta, J. T. (1982). Conditioning of counter-empathic emotional responses.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18 375–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, T., & Walden, T. (1982). Production and discrimination of facial expressions by preschool children.Child Development, 53 1299–1311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, D. (1982). Heart rate as an index of anxiety: Failure of a hypothesis. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.),Perspectives in cardiovascular psychophysiology (pp. 93–126). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godkewitsch, M. (1976). Physiological and verbal indices of arousal in humor. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laugher: Theory, research and applications (pp. 117–138). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, J. C., & Ekman, P. (1981). Methodological problems in Tourangeau and Ellsworth's study of facial expression and experience of emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40 358–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Empathy, its development and prosocial implications. In C. B. Keasey (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol. 25: Social cognitive development (pp. 169–217). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1971).The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1981). Differential emotions theory and the facial feedback hypothesis of emotion activation: Comments on Tourangeau and Ellsworth's “The role of facial response in the experience of emotion.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40 350–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E. (1982). Social presence, facial feedback, and emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 853–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, J. D. (1974). Self-attribution of emotion: The effects of expressive behavior on the quality of emotional experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29 475–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, J. D. (1984). The real role of facial response in the experience of emotion: A reply to Tourangeau and Ellsworth, and others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 909–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langevin, R., & Day, H. I. (1972). Physiological correlates of humor. In J. J. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.)The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues. (pp. 129–142). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzetta, J. T., Cartwright-Smith, J., & Kleck, R. E. (1976). Effects of nonverbal dissimulation on emotional experience and autonomic arousal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33 354–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H. (1980). Toward a comprehensive theory of emotion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 139–207). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H. (1984). A perceptual motor theory of emotion. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Approaches to emotion (pp. 271–292). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H., & Cupchik, G. (1975). The informational and facilitative effects of an audience upon expression and the evaluation of humorous stimuli.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11 363–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H., & Mace, W. (1970). The effect of laughter on evaluation of a slapstick movie.Journal of Personality, 38 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manstead, A. S. R. (1988). The role of facial movement in emotion. In H. L. Wagner (Ed.),Social psychophysiology: Theory and clinical applications (pp. 105–129). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manstead, A. S. R., Wagner, H. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (1984, May).Subjective and autonomic effects of attenuating facial responses during emotional stimulation. Paper presented at the General Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, University of Tilburg, The Netherlands.

  • McCanne, T. R., & Anderson, J. A. (1987). Emotional responding following experimental manipulation of facial electromyographic activity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 759–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaul, K. D., Holmes, D. S., & Solomon, S. (1982). Voluntary expressive changes and emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugo, G. J., Lanzetta, J. T., Sullivan, D. G., Masters, R. D., & Englis, B. G. (1985). Emotional reactions to a political leader's expressive displays.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 1512–1523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrist, P., Webb, R., Sutterer, J., & Howard, J. (1970). The cardiac-somatic relationship: Some reformulations.Psychophysiology, 6 569–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odom, R., & Lemond, C. (1972). Developmental differences in the perception and production of facial expressions.Child Development, 43 359–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R., & Weerts, T. (1982). Cardiovascular responding during anger and fear imagery.Psychological Reports, 50 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, L. L., & Hupka, R. B. (1985). The facial feedback hypothesis: Methodological concerns and new supporting evidence.Motivation and Emotion, 9 219–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F., Martin, L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 768–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. (1962).Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. 1, The positive affects. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S., (1963).Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. 2, The negative affects. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. (1981). The role of facial response in the experience of emotion: A reply to Tourangeau and Ellsworth.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40 355–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., & Ellsworth, P. (1979). The role of facial response in the experience of emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 1519–1531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, K. B., & Lanzetta, J. T. (1981). The effect of modification of expressive displays on vicarious emotional arousal.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research was supported by NSF Grant No. BNS-8507600 and the Lincoln Filene Endowment to Dartmouth College. The authors wish to acknowledge helpful comments provided by Ursula Hess, Timothy L. Hubbard, Arvid Kappas, and two anonymous reviewers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bush, L.K., Barr, C.L., McHugo, G.J. et al. The effects of facial control and facial mimicry on subjective reactions to comedy routines. Motiv Emot 13, 31–52 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995543

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995543

Keywords

Navigation