Skip to main content
Log in

Good reasons for bad testing performance: The interactional substrate of educational exams

  • Articles
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adelman, Howard S. 1979. “Diagnostic Classification of LD: A Practical Necessity and a Procedural Problem.”Learning Disability Quarterly 2: 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, Aaron V. 1982. “Interviews, Surveys, and the Problem of Ecological Validity.”American Sociologist 17: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, Aaron V., Kenneth H. Jennings, Sybillyn H. M. Jennings, Kenneth C. W. Leiter, Robert MacKay, Hugh Mehan, and David R. Roth, eds. 1974.Language Use and School Performance. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, Gerald S. 1978. “The Learning-Disabilities Test Battery: Empirical and Social Issues.”Harvard Educational Review 48: 131–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, Paul. 1981. “Adults' Corrections of Children's Mistakes.” Pp. 244–67 in Peter French and Margaret MacLure (eds.),Adult-Child Conversation. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold. 1967.Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold, Michael Lynch, and Eric Livingston. 1981. “The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1987. “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments.”IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1: 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Allen. 1980. “Mishearings, Misunderstandings, and Other Nonsuccesses in Talk: A Plea for Redress of Speaker-Oriented Bias.”Sociological Inquiry 50: 31–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heap, James. L. 1980. “What Counts as Reading: Limits to Certainty in Assessment.”Curriculum Inquiry 10: 265–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Christian. 1984. “Talk and Recipiency: Sequential Organization in Speech and Body Movement.” Pp. 247–265 inStructures of Social Action, edited by J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, James A. 1983. “Grading Practices: The Construction and Use of Background Knowledge in Evaluative Decision-Making.”Human Studies 6: 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, Gail, and Jim Schenkein. 1977. “Some Sequential Negotiations in Conversation: Unexpanded and Expanded Versions of Projected Action Sequences.”Sociology 11: 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Robin. 1991. “Initiating Interrogative Talk.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association. Cincinnati: August.

  • Lynch, Michael. 1984. “Turning Up Signs in Neurobehavioral Diagnosis.”Symbolic Interaction 7: 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlaire, Courtney L. 1990. “On Questions, Communication, and Bias: Educational Testing as ‘Invisible’ Collaboration.” InPerspectives on Social Problems, Volume 2, ed. by J. A. Holstein and G. Miller. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlaire, Courtney L. Forthcoming. “Professional Idcalizations and Clinical Realities.”Current Research on Occupations and Professions 7, special issue on Human Service Occupations and Professions, ed. by G. Miller. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.

  • Marlaire, Courtney L., and Douglas W. Maynard. 1990. “Standardized Testing as an Interactional Phenomenon.”Sociology of Education 63: 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, Douglas W. 1984.Inside Plea Bargaining: The Language of Negotiation. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazeland, Harrie. 1986. “Some Aspects of the Organization of Repair in Lessons.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Discourse in Institutions. Germany: Dortmund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, Alexander. 1978. “The Organization of Turns at Formal Talk in the Classroom.”Language in Society 7: 183–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1990. “The Organization of Repair in Classroom Talk.”Language in Society 19: 349–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, Hugh. 1973. “Assessing Children's Language Using Abilities: Methodological and Cross Cultural Implications.” Pp. 309–343 inComparative Social Research: Methodological Problems and Strategies, ed. by M. Armer and A. D. Grimshaw. New York:

  • ——. 1978. “Structuring School Structure.”Harvard Educational Review 48: 32–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1979.Learning Lessons. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, Hugh, Alma Hetweck, and J. Lee Meihls. 1986.Handicapping the Handicapped: Decision-Making in Students' Educational Careers. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollner, Melvin. 1979. “Explicative Transactions: Making and Managing Meaning in Traffic Court.” Pp. 227–255 in George Psathas (ed.)Everday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Robert, and L. Jacobson. 1968.Pygmalion in the Classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubovits, Pamela C., and Martin L. Maehr. 1973. “Pygmalion Black and White.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25: 210–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, Harvey. 1967. Unpublished lectures. Irvine: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, Nora C. (1991). “Conversation with a Purpose—or Conversation? Interaction in the Standardized Interview.” Pp. 367–91 inMeasurement Errors in Surveys, ed. by P. P. Biemer, R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg, N. A. Mathiowetz, and S. Sudman. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1982. “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh-Huh’ and Other Things that Come Between Sentences.” Pp. 71–93 inAnalyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, ed. by D. Tannen. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1986. “The Routine as Achievement.”Human Studies 9: 111–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening Up Closings.”Semiotica 8: 298–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.”Language 53: 361–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, Lucy, and Brigitte Jordan. 1990. “Interactional Troubles in Face-to-Face Survey Interviews.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 232–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuy, Roger W., and Peg Griffin, eds. 1978.The Study of Children's Functional Language and Education in the Early Years. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. M., and R. M. Coulthard. 1975.Toward an Analysis of Discourse: English Used by Teachers and Pupils. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyke, James E. 1986. “The Use of Assessment Information to Make Decisions About Students.” Pp. 8–27 in Richard J. Morris and Borton Blatt (eds.),Special Education: Research and Trends. Elmsford, New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maynard, D.W., Marlaire, C.L. Good reasons for bad testing performance: The interactional substrate of educational exams. Qual Sociol 15, 177–202 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989493

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989493

Keywords

Navigation