Skip to main content
Log in

Big girls don't frown, big boys don't cry—Gender differences of professional actors in communicating emotion via facial expression

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It was tested whether professional actors would be able to communicate emotional meaning via facial expression when this is presented to judges without context information. Forty takes were selected from movies, depicting a female or a male actor in close-up showing facial expression. These close-ups were selected by two expert judges, who knew the complete movie and had to agree on the emotion expressed or expected to be expressed by the female or male actor in the respective take. Five takes each were selected to represent the basic emotions of joy, sadness, fear, and anger. Twenty takes each were selected showing female and male actors. These 40 takes (edited in random order onto video tape) were presented to 90 judges (about half female and half male; about half younger pupils and about half older ones), whose task it was to judge the emotion(s) expressed on nine 5-point-emotion scales. Results indicated that female actors are somewhat better (though not statistically significant) in communicating emotion via facial expression without context than male actors are. Furthermore, significant interactions between portrayed emotion and gender of actors were found: While recognition rate for joy is very high and identical for both genders, female actors seem to be superior in communicating fear and sadness via facial expression, while male actors are more successful in communicating anger. A “display rule” approach seems to be appropriate for the interpretation of these results, indicating that gender-specific attempts to control/inhibit certain emotions do not only exist in “real life”, but also in movies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cline, M.G. (1956). The influence of social context on the perception of faces.Journal of Personality, 2, 142–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1971, vol. 19 (pp. 207–283), Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. & Friesen, W.V. (1975).Unmasking the face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V. & Ellsworth, P. (1982). What are the relative contributions of facial behaviour and contextual information to the judgement of emotion? In P. Ekman (Ed.),Emotion in the human face (pp. 111–127). 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N.H. (1969). Recognition of emotion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 167–224). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, F.L. & Finker, M.A. (1931). The relative potency of facial expression and verbal description of stimulus in the judgement of emotion.Comparative Psychology, 12 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonveral behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 85 845–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A. (1984).Nonverbal sex differences. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R.M. & Morency, N.L. (1980).The cross-cultural perception of emotion. Unpubl., Columbia University.

  • Rosenthal, R. (1979).Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallbott, H.G. (1988). Faces in context: The relative importance of facial expression and context information in determining emotion attributions. In K.R. Scherer (Ed.),Facets of emotion (pp. 139–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallbott, H.G. (1988). “Aus dem Zusammenhang gerissen”—Schauspielermimik ohne Kontextinformation (Out of context—actors' facial expression without context information).Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 35 xxx-xxx. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallbott, H.G. (in press). In and out of context—Influences of facial expression and context information on emotion attributions.British Journal of Social Psychology.

  • Wallbott, H.G. & Scherer, K.R. (1986). Cues and channels in emotion recognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 690–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S.G. (1972). Judgement of emotion from facial and contextual cue combinations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24 334–342.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waxer, P.H. (1985). Video ethology: Television as a data base for cross-cultural studies in nonverbal displays.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported here was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WA 519/2-2). I thank Uwe Balser and Tina Mertesacker for their help in selecting the stimuli, preparing the judgment tapes, recruiting subjects and conducting the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallbott, H.G. Big girls don't frown, big boys don't cry—Gender differences of professional actors in communicating emotion via facial expression. J Nonverbal Behav 12, 98–106 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986928

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986928

Keywords

Navigation