Skip to main content
Log in

Shame, anger, and conflict: Case study of emotional violence

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a new theory and method for understanding emotional violence: conflict results from threats to the social bond. Protracted conflict may be a result of social-emotional separation and unacknowledged shame. A single case is used to analyze the dynamics of marital conflict. Discourse is analyzed during an actual quarrel; sequences of emotion are traced prior to moments of escalation. The results indicate that not only did anger occur during conflict, but also it was preceded by unacknowledged shame. Sequences within and between spouses alternated from emotional separation and shame, to anger, to disrespect, to further separation and shame, and so on. Interaction in this couple was marked by alienation rather than solidarity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamson, L., Als, H., Tronick, E., and Brazelton, T. B. (1977). The development of social reciprocity between a sighted infant and her blind parents.J. Am. Acad. Child Psychiatry 16: 194–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. (1979). Infant-mother attachment.Am. Psychologist 34: 932–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1978).Family Therapy in Clinical Practice, Jason Aronson, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1973).Attachment and Loss, Vol. 2, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazelton, T. B. (1982). Joint regulation of neonate-parent interaction. In Tronick E. (ed.),Social Exchange in Infancy, University Park Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazelton, T. B., Koslowski, B. V., and Main, M. (1974). The origins of reciprocity: Early mother-infant interaction. In Lewis, M., and Rosenblum, L., (eds.),The Effect of the Infant on Its Caregiver, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1957).Community Conflict, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1902).Human Nature and the Social Order, Schocken Books, New York (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1956).The Functions of Social Conflict, Glencoe, Ill.

  • Darwin, C. (1872).The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, John Murray, London (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelmann, R. J. (1987).The Psychology of Embarrassment, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., and Freisen, W. V. (1975).Unmasking the Face, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., and Freisen, W. V. (1978). Facial Action Coding System, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., and Freisen, W. V. (1982). Felt, false and miserable smiles.J. Nonverb. Behav. 6: 238–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967).Interaction Ritual, Anchor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. (1979).Marital Interaction, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J., and Levenson, R. (1986). Assessing the role of emotion in marriage.Behav. Assess. 8: 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, L. A., Winget, C. N., and Gleser, G. C. (1969).Manual of Instruction for Using the Gottschalk-Gleser Content Analysis Scales: Anxiety, Hostility, and Social Alienation-Personal Disorganization. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, H. (1962). The heterosexual affectional system in monkeys.Am. Psychologist 17: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1983).The Managed. Heart. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. (1971).The Face of Emotion, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. (1977).Human Emotion, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J., and Campbell, L. (1988).Impasses in Divorce, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1988).Seductions to Crime, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. E. (1971). Thoughts on narcissism and narcissistic rage.The Search for the Self, International University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreisberg, L. (1973).The Sociology of Social Conflicts, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W., and Fanshel, D. (1977).Therapeutic Discourse, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansky, M. (1987). Shame and domestic violence. In Nathanson, D. (ed.),The Many Faces of Shame, Guilford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. (1986). Personal communication.

  • Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis.The Psychoanal. Rev. 58: 434–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. B. (1976).Psychic War in Men and Women, New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. B. (1979). Using content analysis to explore shame and guilt in neurosis. In Gottschalk (ed.),The Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior, Halstead Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Retzinger, S.M. Shame, anger, and conflict: Case study of emotional violence. J Fam Viol 6, 37–59 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978525

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978525

Key words

Navigation