Abstract
Use of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) in clinical research assumes that the questionnaire measures a single factor. A factor analysis of the CFQ was performed, on a sample of 475 students, using accurate procedures for determining the number of factors. These procedures gave mutually inconsistent results: at least two alternative factor structures can be extracted from the CFQ. An interpretable seven factor solution was found, but the CFQ probably has insufficient items to measure more than two strongly defined factors. The capacity of CFQ multiple factors to predict measures related to stress vulnerability was tested in a further study (N=57). Correlations between CFQ total score and neuroticism and use of coping strategies appeared to depend mainly on a single CFQ multiple factor, related to failures of concentration. Some of the other CFQ factors predicted other criteria. Further research on multiple factors of cognitive failure might improve the validity of the CFQ as a predictor of stress vulnerability and of cognitive performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett, M. S. (1937). The statistical conception of mental factors.British Journal of Psychology, 28, 97–104.
Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis.British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77–85.
Broadbent, D. E. (1985). Personal communication, 4 June.
Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. J., Fitzgerald, P. F., & Parkes, K. R. (1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1–16.
Broadbent, D. E., Broadbent, M. H. P., & Jones, J. L. (1986). Performance correlates of self-reported cognitive failure and obsessionality.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 285–300.
Cattell, R. B. (1978).The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioural and life sciences. New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1963).The Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985).Personality and individual differences: A natural sciences approach. New York: Plenum.
Eysenck, M. W. (1982).Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. New York: Springer.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003.
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 571–579.
Gabbitas, P. (1987).The relationships between stress, appraisal, coping and anxiety: Towards a cognitive therapy of anxiety. Unpublished paper, University of Aston, Birmingham, U.K.
Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns.Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275.
Harman, H. H. (1976).Modern factor analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.
Humphreys, L. G., & Ilgen, D. R. (1969). Note on a criterion for the number of common factors.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 571–578.
Jerison, H. J. (1970). Vigilance: A paradigm and some physiological speculations.Acta Psychologica, 33, 367–380.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.
Martin, M. (1985). Neuroticism as cognitive predisposition toward depression: A cognitive mechanism.Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 353–365.
Matthews, G. (1989). The factor structure of the 16PF: Twelve primary and three secondary factors.Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 931–940.
Matthews, G., & Wells, A. (1988). Relationships between anxiety, self-consciousness, and cognitive failure.Cognition ana Emotion, 2, 123–132.
Morgenstern, F. S., Hodgson, R. J., & Law, J. (1974). Work efficiency and personality: A comparison of introverted and extraverted subjects exposed to conditions of distraction and distortion of stimulus in a learning task.Ergonomics, 17, 211–220.
Nideffer, R. M. (1976). Test of attentional and interpersonal style.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 394–404.
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1985). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.),Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 4). New York: Plenum Press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Revelle, W., & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very simple structure: An alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors.Multivariate Behavioural Research, 14, 403–414.
Sarason, I. G. (1975). Anxiety and self-preoccupation. In I. G. Sarason & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.),Stress and anxiety (Vol. 2). London: Wiley.
SPSS Inc. (1983).SPSSX User's Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thorndike, R. M. (1978).Correlational procedures for research. New York: Gardner Press.
Tucker, L. B., Koopman, R. F., & Linn, R. L. (1969). Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices.Psychometrika, 34, 421.
Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations.Psychometrika, 41, 321–327.
Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1986).Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rhode Island, Kingston.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matthews, G., Coyle, K. & Craig, A. Multiple factors of cognitive failure and their relationships with stress vulnerability. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 12, 49–65 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960453
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960453