Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of appealing distractors on the performance of hyperactive children

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study investigated whether hyperactive children were more suceptible to appealing distractors than were normal children. Twenty hyperactive and 20 normal children performed arithmetic tasks under three levels of distraction: no distraction, low-appeal distraction, and high-appeal distraction. Hyperactive children were significantly more affected by both low- and high appeal distractors than were the normal children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatrie Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C., 1980.

  • Bateman, B. D. Educational implications of minimal brain dysfunction. In F. F. de la Cruz, B. H. Fox, & R. H. Roberts (Eds.),Minimal brain dysfunction. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, D. A., & Stern, J. A. Attention and distractibility during reading in hyperactive boys.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1976,4, 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. B., Douglas, V. I., & Morgenstern, G. Cognitive styles in hyperactive children and the effect of methylphenidate.Child Psychology, 1971,12, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. L., & Diaz, A. Effects of visual and auditory background on reading test performance.Exceptional Children, 1971,38, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C. K. A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969,126, 884–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, W. M., Bentzen, F. A., Ratzburg, F. H., & Tannhauser, M. T.A teaching method for brain injured and hyperactive children: A demonstration pilot study. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, W. M., Junkala, J. B., & Paul, J. L.The preparation of teachers of brain injured children. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, V. I. Stop, look and listen: the problem of sustained attention and impulse control in hyperactive and normal children.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1972,4, 259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykman, R., Walls, R. C., Suzuki, T., Ackerman, P. T., & Peters, J. E. Children with learning disabilities: Condition differentiation and the effect of distraction.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1970,40, 766–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, D. P., & Kaufman, J. M.Introduction to learning disabilities. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, J. F. & Jastak, S. R.The Wide Range Achievement Test, Revised edition. Wilmington, Del: Wilmington Guidance Associates, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. F., & Prinz, R. Hyperactivity is in the eyes of the beholder.Clinical Pediatrics, 1976,15, 222–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. F., & Gittelman-Klein, R. Problems in the diagnosis of minimal brain dysfunction and hyperkinetic syndrome.International Journal of Mental Health, 1975,4, 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R. An application of conditioning techniques to the control of a hyperactive child. In L. P. Ullmann & L. Krasner (Eds.),Case studies in behavior modification New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosh, A.The effects of visual distractors on the performance of hyperactive children on an arithmetic task. Unpublished doctoral disseration, City University of New York, 1980.

  • Rost, K. F., & Charles, Q. C. Academic achievement of brain injured and hyperactive children in isolation.Exceptional Children, 1967,34, 125–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, J. W., Warnberg, L. S., & Bost, D. E. Effects of cubicles versus increased stimulation on task performance by first grade males perceived as distractible or nondistractibleJournal of Special Education, 1973,7, 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. A. Typology in mental deficiency.Proceedings of the American Association of Mental Deficiency, 1939,44, 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. A., & Lehtinen, L.Psychopathology and education of the brain-injured child. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. A., & Werner, J. Comparative psychopathology of the brain-injured child and the traumatic brain-injured adult.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1943,99, 835–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, D. H., Douglas, V. I., Weiss, G., & Minde, K. K. Attention in hyperactive children and the effect of methylphenidate.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1971,12, 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D.Wechsler intelligence scale for children — revised. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S. S., Zentall, T. R., & Barack, R. R. Distraction as a function of within-task stimulation for hyperactive and normal children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1978,11, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This report is based upon a dissertation submitted by A. Radosh in partial fulfillment of the Ph.D. degree. The valuable contributions of Dr. Tina Moreau and Dr. Daniel Caputo are gratefully acknowledged. The study was supported in part by NIMH grant MH 18579.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radosh, A., Gittelman, R. The effect of appealing distractors on the performance of hyperactive children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 9, 179–189 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919113

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919113

Keywords

Navigation