Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of objective classroom measures and teacher ratings of attention deficit disorder

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children identified as Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) on the basis of teacher ratings using the SNAP Rating Scale were compared to non-ADD children on objective classroom measures including observations of classroom behavior, examination of the organization of children’s desks, and scoring of daily academic work. Analyses provided some support for the ability of the objective measures to differentiate between teacher-identified ADD and non-ADD children, though there was considerable overlap on the distributions of most variables between groups. Six measures chosen by a discriminant analysis combined to predict teacher ratings in 83% of the cases. The inclusion of academic, observational, and desk measures in the discriminant function indicates the importance of a multivariate assessment of this construct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abikoff, H., Gittelman, R., & Klein, D. F. (1980). Classroom observation code for hyperactive children: A replication of validity.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 555–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abikoff, H., Gittelman-Klein, R., & Klein, D. F. (1977). Validation of a classroom observation code for hyperactive children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 772–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, V. I., & Peters, K. G. (1979). Toward a clearer definition of the attentional deficit of hyperactive children. In G. A. Hale & M. Lewis (Eds.),Attention and the development of cognitive skills (pp. 173–247). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, D. W. (1978).Strategies for personality research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyette, G. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on Revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. N., & Kerns, R. D. (1979). Validation of a behavioral observation system.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 397–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keough, B. K., & Barkett, C. J. (1980). An educational analysis of hyperactive children’s achievement problems. In C. K. Whalen & B. Henker (Eds.),Hyperactive children: The social ecology of identification and treatment (pp. 259–282). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loney, J. (1982).Research diagnostic criteria for childhood hyperactivity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychopathological Association, New York.

  • Loney, J., & Milich, R. (1982). Hyperactivity, inattention, and aggression in clinical practice. In M. Wolraich & D. K. Routh (Eds.),Advances in behavioral pediatrics (Vol. 2). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw-Hill. (1974).Comprehensive tests of basic skills (Form S). Monterey, California: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. L. (Ed.). (in press).Observation assessment instrumentation for institutional research and treatment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Pelham, W. E. (1982a). Childhood hyperactivity: Diagnosis, etiology, nature and treatment. In R. Gatchel, A. Baum, & J. Singer (Eds.),Behavioral medicine and clinical psychology: Overlapping disciplines (pp. 261–327). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, W. E. (1982b, August).Laboratory measures of attention in the diagnosis of hyperactivity/attention deficit disorder. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C.

  • Pelham, W. E., Atkins, M. S., Murphy, H. A., & White, K. J. (1981, November).Operationalization and validity of attention deficit disorders. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy. Toronto.

  • Pelham, W. E., & Bender, M. E. (1982). Peer relationships in hyperactive children: Description and treatment. In K. D. Gadow & I. Bialer (Eds.),Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 1 pp. 365–436). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, W. E., Atkins, M. S., Murphy, H. A., & Swanson, J. M. (1984).A rating scale for the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder: Teacher norms, factor analyses, and reliability. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Quay, H. C. (1979). Classification. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.),Psychopathological disorders of childhood (2nd ed., pp. 1–42). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saal, F. E., Downey, R. G., & Lahey, M. A. (1980). Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data.Psychological Bulletin, 88, 413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, R. L. (1983, February).Tardive dyskinesia in mentally retarded people treated with psychotropic drugs. Paper presented at the Florida State University Psychology Department Colloquium, Tallahassee.

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977).Exploratory data analysis. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, J. P., Williams, B. J., Harris, G. E., & Duval, G. C. (1981). Classroom observations of hyperactive children: A multiple validation study. In K. D. Gadow & J. Loney (Eds.),Psychosocial aspects of drug treatment for hyperactivity (pp. 207–248). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werry, J. S., Sprague, R. L., & Cohen, M. M. (1975). Conners Teacher Rating Scale for use in drug studies with children: An empirical study.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 217–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, C. K., Henker, B., Collins, B. E., Finck, D., & Dotemoto, S. (1979). A social ecology of hyperactive boys: Medication effects in structured classroom environments.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 65–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Portions of this paper were presented as part of a symposium, W. Pelham (Chair),Identification and diagnosis of children with attention deficit disorder/hyperactivity, at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., August 1982. We thank the director, Dr. Edward Vertuno, and the teachers and staff of the Florida State University Developmental Research School for their cooperation and efforts throughout this study. In addition, we wish to thank our observers, Susan Friedan and Stephanie Martinez, whose patience, intelligence, and dedicated effort made this study possible; Denise Gammonsly, for work on the development of the Desk Checks, and Dr. Janet Belew, whose contributions during the early phase of this research are gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atkins, M.S., Pelham, W.E. & Licht, M.H. A comparison of objective classroom measures and teacher ratings of attention deficit disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 13, 155–167 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00918379

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00918379

Keywords

Navigation