Abstract
Children identified as Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) on the basis of teacher ratings using the SNAP Rating Scale were compared to non-ADD children on objective classroom measures including observations of classroom behavior, examination of the organization of children’s desks, and scoring of daily academic work. Analyses provided some support for the ability of the objective measures to differentiate between teacher-identified ADD and non-ADD children, though there was considerable overlap on the distributions of most variables between groups. Six measures chosen by a discriminant analysis combined to predict teacher ratings in 83% of the cases. The inclusion of academic, observational, and desk measures in the discriminant function indicates the importance of a multivariate assessment of this construct.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abikoff, H., Gittelman, R., & Klein, D. F. (1980). Classroom observation code for hyperactive children: A replication of validity.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 555–565.
Abikoff, H., Gittelman-Klein, R., & Klein, D. F. (1977). Validation of a classroom observation code for hyperactive children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 772–783.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
Douglas, V. I., & Peters, K. G. (1979). Toward a clearer definition of the attentional deficit of hyperactive children. In G. A. Hale & M. Lewis (Eds.),Attention and the development of cognitive skills (pp. 173–247). New York: Plenum Press.
Fiske, D. W. (1978).Strategies for personality research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Goyette, G. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on Revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221–236.
Haynes, S. N., & Kerns, R. D. (1979). Validation of a behavioral observation system.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 397–400.
Keough, B. K., & Barkett, C. J. (1980). An educational analysis of hyperactive children’s achievement problems. In C. K. Whalen & B. Henker (Eds.),Hyperactive children: The social ecology of identification and treatment (pp. 259–282). New York: Academic Press.
Loney, J. (1982).Research diagnostic criteria for childhood hyperactivity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychopathological Association, New York.
Loney, J., & Milich, R. (1982). Hyperactivity, inattention, and aggression in clinical practice. In M. Wolraich & D. K. Routh (Eds.),Advances in behavioral pediatrics (Vol. 2). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
McGraw-Hill. (1974).Comprehensive tests of basic skills (Form S). Monterey, California: Author.
Paul, G. L. (Ed.). (in press).Observation assessment instrumentation for institutional research and treatment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pelham, W. E. (1982a). Childhood hyperactivity: Diagnosis, etiology, nature and treatment. In R. Gatchel, A. Baum, & J. Singer (Eds.),Behavioral medicine and clinical psychology: Overlapping disciplines (pp. 261–327). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Pelham, W. E. (1982b, August).Laboratory measures of attention in the diagnosis of hyperactivity/attention deficit disorder. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C.
Pelham, W. E., Atkins, M. S., Murphy, H. A., & White, K. J. (1981, November).Operationalization and validity of attention deficit disorders. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy. Toronto.
Pelham, W. E., & Bender, M. E. (1982). Peer relationships in hyperactive children: Description and treatment. In K. D. Gadow & I. Bialer (Eds.),Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 1 pp. 365–436). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
Pelham, W. E., Atkins, M. S., Murphy, H. A., & Swanson, J. M. (1984).A rating scale for the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder: Teacher norms, factor analyses, and reliability. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Quay, H. C. (1979). Classification. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.),Psychopathological disorders of childhood (2nd ed., pp. 1–42). New York: Wiley.
Saal, F. E., Downey, R. G., & Lahey, M. A. (1980). Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data.Psychological Bulletin, 88, 413–428.
Sprague, R. L. (1983, February).Tardive dyskinesia in mentally retarded people treated with psychotropic drugs. Paper presented at the Florida State University Psychology Department Colloquium, Tallahassee.
Tukey, J. W. (1977).Exploratory data analysis. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Vincent, J. P., Williams, B. J., Harris, G. E., & Duval, G. C. (1981). Classroom observations of hyperactive children: A multiple validation study. In K. D. Gadow & J. Loney (Eds.),Psychosocial aspects of drug treatment for hyperactivity (pp. 207–248). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Werry, J. S., Sprague, R. L., & Cohen, M. M. (1975). Conners Teacher Rating Scale for use in drug studies with children: An empirical study.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 217–230.
Whalen, C. K., Henker, B., Collins, B. E., Finck, D., & Dotemoto, S. (1979). A social ecology of hyperactive boys: Medication effects in structured classroom environments.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 65–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Portions of this paper were presented as part of a symposium, W. Pelham (Chair),Identification and diagnosis of children with attention deficit disorder/hyperactivity, at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., August 1982. We thank the director, Dr. Edward Vertuno, and the teachers and staff of the Florida State University Developmental Research School for their cooperation and efforts throughout this study. In addition, we wish to thank our observers, Susan Friedan and Stephanie Martinez, whose patience, intelligence, and dedicated effort made this study possible; Denise Gammonsly, for work on the development of the Desk Checks, and Dr. Janet Belew, whose contributions during the early phase of this research are gratefully acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atkins, M.S., Pelham, W.E. & Licht, M.H. A comparison of objective classroom measures and teacher ratings of attention deficit disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 13, 155–167 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00918379
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00918379