Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of reward and punishment on reaction times and autonomic activity in hyperactive and normal children

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of hyperactive and control children was compared on a delayed reaction time task under three reinforcement conditions: reward, punishment, and reward plus punishment. Hyperactives had slower and more variable reaction times, suggesting an attentional deficit. Although each of the three reinforcement conditions was successful in improving reaction times for both subject groups, reward led to a significant increase in impulsive responses in the hyperactive children. Autonomic data revealed that reward also increased arousal to a greater extent than punishment or reward plus punishment. Although resting skin conductance was not different in the two groups of subjects, hyperactives produced fewer specific autonomic responses to signal stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boydstun, J. A., Ackerman, P. T., Stevens, D. A., Clements, S. D., Peters, J. E., & Dykman, R. A. Physiologic and motor conditioning and generalization in children with minimal brain dysfunction.Conditional Reflex, 1968,3, 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. B., Douglas, V. I., & Morgenstern, G. Cognitive styles in hyperactive children and the effect of methylphenidate.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 1971,12, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chess, S. Diagnosis and treatment of the hyperkinetic child.New York State Journal of Medicine, 1960,60, 23–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, D. E., & Sprague, R. L. Reduction of hyperactive behavior by conditioning procedures alone and combined with methylphenidate.Behavioral Research and Therapy, 1973,16, 331–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N.J. Physiological concomitants of attention in hyperactive children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, 1970.

  • Cohen, N. J., & Douglas, V. I. Characteristics of the orienting response in hyperactive and normal children.Psychophysiology, 1972,9, 238–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C. K. A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969,126, 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C. K. Symposium: Behavior modification by drugs II. Psychological effects of stimulant drugs in children with minimal brain dysfunction.Pediatrics, 1972,49, 702–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, V. I. Stop, look and listen: The problems of sustained attention and impulse control in hyperactive and normal children.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1972,4, 259–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, V. I. Sustained attention and impulse control: Implication for the handicapped child. In J. A. Swets & L. L. Elliott (Eds.),Psychology and the handicapped child. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Office of Education, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykman, R. A., Ackerman, P. T., Clements, S., & Peters, J. E. Specific learning disabilities: An attentional deficit syndrome. In H. R. Myklebust (Ed.),Progress in Learning Disabilities (Vol. 2). New York: Grune & Stratton, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferritor, D. E., Buckholdt, D., Hamblin, R. L., & Smith, L. The noneffect of contingent reinforcement for attending behavior on work accomplished.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972,5, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freibergs, V., & Douglas, V. I. Concept learning in hyperactive and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969,74, 388–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germana, J., & Chernault, G. Patterns of galvanic skin response to signal and non-signal stimuli.Psychophysiology, 1968,5, 284–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O.A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough, B. A. Hyperactivity and learning disorders: Review and speculation.Exceptional Children, 1911,37, 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, M., Denhoff, E., & Solomons, G. Hyperkinetic impulse disorder in children's behavior problems.Psychosomatic Medicine, 1957,19, 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R.The mentally retarded child. New York: Pergamon Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. T. Neuropsychology and psychophysiology in personality research. In E. R. Borgatta & W. W. Lambert (Eds.),Handbook of personality theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, P., and Douglas, V. The effect of reward on the performance of hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, in press, 1975.

  • Patterson, G. R., Jones, R., Whittier, J., & Wright, M. A. A behavior modification technique for the hyperactive child.Behavior Research and Therapy, 1965,2, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pihl, R. O. Conditioning procedures with hyperactive children.Neurology, 1967,17, 421–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, H., Sprague, R., Werry, J., & McQueen, M. Conditioning visual orientation of conduct problem children in the classroom.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1966,5, 512–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satterfield, J. H., & Dawson, M. E. Electrodermal correlates of hyperactivity in children,Psychophysiology, 1971,8, 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, Y. N.Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: MacMillan, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. The distracting effects of material reinforcers in the discrimination learning of lower and middle-class children.Child Development, 1970,41, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, R. K., Christensen, D. E., & Werry, J. S. Experimental psychology and stimulant drugs.Monograph of Pediatrics, 1975, in press.

  • Spring, C., Greenberg, L., Scott, J., & Hopwood, J. Electrodermal activity in hyperactive boys who are methylphenidate responders.Psychophysiology1974,11, 436–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, D. H., Douglas, V. L., & Morgenstern, G. The effect of methylphenidate (Ritalin) on sustained attention in hyperactive children.Psychopharmacologia, 1972,25, 262–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wender, P. H. The minimal brain dysfunction syndrome in children.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1972,155, 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werry, J., & Sprague, L. Hyperactivity. In C. G. Costello (Ed.),Symptoms of psychopathology. New York: Wiley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, J. Pitfalls in the methodology of the law of initial value.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 1965,63, 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B.J. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was conducted in partial fulfillment of the Ph.D. while the first author was at McGill University. The research was supported by Canada Council grant number S72-1389 to Dr. V. I. Douglas, and by a grant from the Social Science Research Fund, McGill University (No. 943-03-69).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Firestone, P., Douglas, V. The effects of reward and punishment on reaction times and autonomic activity in hyperactive and normal children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 3, 201–216 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916751

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916751

Keywords

Navigation