Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A divided attention experiment with pervasively hyperactive children

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Task performance of 12 pervasive hyperactives and controls was studied in a divided attention reaction time experiment. The two groups differed with respect to task efficiency. The hyperactives were slower than controls, had more variable reaction times, and made more frequent errors. Task inefficiency could not be explained by a deficiency in divided attention or impulsive responding in the hyperactive group. Further, the observed differences in IQ between the groups could not account for the differential performance finding. It is concluded that input and/or output processes, probably in combination with energetical factors, might be disturbed in hyperactive children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1968).Computational handbook of Statistics (pp. 191–194). Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, V. I. (1983). Attentional and cognitive problems. In M. Rutter (Ed.),Developmental neuropsychiatry (pp. 280–329). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E., Esveldt-Dawson, K., & Loar, L. L. (1983). Correspondlence of teacher ratings and direct observations of classroom behavior of psychiatric inpatient children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 11, 549–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N. M., Sandoval, J., & Sassone, D. (1978). Prevalence of hyperactivity in elementary school children as a function of social system definers.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48, 446–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollman, R. (1977). Choice reaction time and the problem of distinguishing task effects from strategy effects. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 99–113). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorial in performance and recognition (pp. 41–82). Potomac, Maryland: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A. F. (1983). Toward a model of stress and human performance.Acta Psychologica, 53, 61–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., Rutter, M., & Smith, A. (1981). The chracteristics of situationally and pervasively hyperactive children: Implications for syndrome definition.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22, 375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention.Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., & Scholten, C. A. (1983). A stages of information approach to hyperactivity.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., & Scholten, C. A. (1985a). On resource strategy limitations in hyperactivity: Cognitive impulsivity reconsidered.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., & Scholten, C. A. (1985b). On data limitations in hyperactivity.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., van Velthoven, R., & Virginia, A. (1979). Hyperactivity, impulsivity and reflectivity: An examination of their relationship and implications for clinical child psychology.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Experimental Clinical Psychology, University of Groningen, Turfsingel 46, 9712, KR Groningen, The Netherlands

    Jaap van der Meere

  2. Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Weesperplein 8, 1018XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Joseph Sergeant

Authors
  1. Jaap van der Meere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph Sergeant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The authors wish to thank L. Leertouwer for making the drawings, and the students Ellie Wekking and Sipke Boorsma for their selection procedure work. This research was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Foundation for the Advancement of Pure Research (ZWO) and by the Professor Duijker Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Meere, J., Sergeant, J. A divided attention experiment with pervasively hyperactive children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 15, 379–391 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916456

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916456

Keywords

Search

Navigation