Skip to main content
Log in

Production deficiencies in elicited language but not in the spontaneous verbalizations of hyperactive children

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Setting and task conditions were assessed for their effects on the language of hyperactive children. Verbal data were recorded for 22 hyperactive children and 22 elementary-age controls during four storytelling tasks and transitions, and under two conditions of a nonverbal performance task in a counterbalanced order. Findings were that hyperactive children were more spontaneously talkative than their classmates during transitions and nonverbal tasks (nonelicited conditions) but were less talkative when they were asked to tell stories (elicited conditions). These findings and those attributable to the story comparisons were interpreted in line with the optimal stimulation theory, which suggests that minimal stimulus input (delays and nonelicited conditions) precipitate excessive verbal activity from hyperactive children. Production deficiencies, on the other hand, were specific to type of stimulus input to be processed. Stories requiring organization and planning without the external structure or salience of visual cues (a sequence of word cards or pictures) produced production deficiencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blunden, D., Spring, C., & Greenberg, L. M. (1974). Validation of the classroom behavior inventory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, R. M. (1967). Hypo-responsiveness as a behavioral correlate of brain damage in children.Psychological Reports, 20, 251–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, E., & Cammock, J. (1978). Development of a more reliable version of the Matching Familiar Figures Test.Developmental Psychology, 5, 555–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. (1963). Recent research in originality.Elementary English, 40, 583–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. (1965). Sparkling words: Two hundred practical and creative writing ideas. Berkeley, CA: Wagner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, I. (1964).Language and thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children (Special issue).Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9, 24–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, A. P. (1979). Types of private speech produced by hyperactive and nonhyperactive boys.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, A. P., & Weissbrod, C. S. (1978). Behavioral correlates of the hyperactivity factor of the Conners Teacher Questionnaire.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. E., Siegel, L. S., & Offord, D. R. (1985). A developmental dose-response analysis of the effects of methylphenidate on the peer interactions of attention deficit disordered boys.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 955–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davids, A. (1971). An objective instrument for assessing hyperkinesis in children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienske, H., DeJonge, G., & Sanders-Woudstra, J. A. R. (1985). Quantitative criteria for attention and activity in child psychiatric patients.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 895–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, K. (1986). Telling tales: Narratives and learning disabled children.Topics in Language Disorders, 6, 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1955). Drives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system).Psychological Review, 62, 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, C. L., Rapoport, J. L., Bassich, C. J., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (1980). Differential effects of dextroamphetamine on language performance in hyperactive and normal boys. In R. M. Knights & D. J. Bakker (Eds.),Treatment of hyperactive and learning disordered children. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madan-Swain, A. J., & Zentall, S. S. (1988).Behavioral comparisons of accepted and rejected hyperactive children and behavioral accommodations by their matched controls in play settings. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Mayer, M., & Mayer, M. (1974).One frog too many. New York: Dial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L., & Mastrollo, L. V. (Eds.). (1958). Who did it?Reader's Digest Skill Builder (Grade 2, Part 1). Pleasantville, NY: Reader's Digest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, W. E., & Bender, M. E. (1982). Peer relationships in hyperactive children: Description and treatment. In K. D. Gadow (Ed.),Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 365–436). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, H. W. (1962). Verbal mediation as a function of age level.Psychological Bulletin, 59, 502–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, R. K., Sleator, E. K., & Sprague, R. L. (1985). A change of mind: The Conners Abbreviated Rating Scales reconsidered.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 553–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, G., & Hechtman, L. T. (1986).Hyperactive children grown up. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, C. K., Collins, B. E., Henker, B., Alkus, S. R., Adams., D., & Stapp, J. (1978). Behavior observations of hyperactive children and methylphenidate (Ritalin) effects in systematically structured classroom environments: Now you see them now you don't.Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 3, 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. J., Vincent, J. P., & Elrod, J. T. (1977).The behavioral components of hyperactivity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.

  • Zentall, S. (1975). Optimal stimulation as theoretical basis of hyperactivity.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45, 549–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S. S. (1980). Behavioral comparisons of hyperactive and normally active children in natural settings.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S. S. (1984). Context effects in the behavioral ratings of hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S. S. (1985a). A context for hyperactivity. In K. D. Gadow (Ed.),Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 4, pp. 273–343). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S. S. (1985b). Stimulus-control factors in search performance of hyperactive children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 480–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S. S., & Barack, R. S. (1979). Rating scales for hyperactivity: Concurrent validity, reliability, and decision to label for the Conners and Davids abbreviated scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S. S., Gohs, D. E., & Culatta, B. (1983). Language and activity of hyperactive and comparison preschoolers in a listening task.Exceptional Children, 50, 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S. S., & Kruczek, T. (1988). The attraction of color for active attention problem children.Exceptional Children, 54, 357–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S. S., & Shaw, J. H. (1980). Effects of classroom noise on performance and activity of second-grade hyperactive and control children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 830–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S. S., & Zentall, T. R. (1983). Optimal stimulation: A model of disordered activity and performance in normal and deviant children.Psychological Bulletin, 94, 446–471.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I thank Margo Wilson for her expertise in the development and scoring of the language measures. I am also grateful to Mary Kemper for help with data collection, and to Joe Boggs and Connie Hobbs for their assistance with data analyses.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zentall, S.S. Production deficiencies in elicited language but not in the spontaneous verbalizations of hyperactive children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 16, 657–673 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00913476

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00913476

Keywords

Navigation