Skip to main content
Log in

Are hyperactive children deficient in attentional capacity?

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A dual task was used to study attentional capcity in three groups: in 6- to 12- year- old boys with attention deficit disorder plus hyperactivity (ADDH) or with ADDH and conduct disorder, and in normal children. Subjects performed a primary-choice reaction-time task first without and then with a secondary task that also required a response. Our prediction that the reaction time of ADDH subjects to the secondary task would increase more with increasing temporal overlap of the primary and secondary stimuli, if they were deficient in capacity, was not supported. However, the performance of ADDH subjects on the primary task deteriorated more than that of control subjects with the introduction of the secondary task, indicating a greater concurrence cost or a different allocation policy. Moreover, ADDH subjects had longer reaction times to the secondary task, indicating greater refractory effects or difficulty shifting capacity from primary- to secondary-task processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. C., Williams, S., McGee, R., & Silva, P. A. (1987). DSM-III disorders in preadolescent children: Prevalence in a large sample from the general population.Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Tishman, J. (1984). Hyperactivity and incidental memory: Evidence for attentional diffusion.Child Development, 55, 2192–2203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chee, P., Logan, G., Schachar, R., Lindsay, P., & Wachsmuth, R. (1989). Effects of event rate and display time on sustained attention in hyperactive, normal, and control children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 371–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales in drug studies with children. Pharmacotherapy of children [Special issue].Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24–29.

  • Douglas, V. (1983). Attentional and cognitive problems. In M. Rutter (Ed.),Developmental neuropsychiatry (pp. 280–329). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli.Psychological Review, 87, 272–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, A. D., Derrick, W. L., & Schneider, W. (1986–87, Winter). A methodological assessment and evaluation of dual-task paradigms.Current Psychological Research & Reviews, 5(4), 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globerson, T. (1983a). Mental capacity, mental effort, and cognitive style.Developmental Review, 3, 292–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globerson, T. (1983b). Mental capacity and cognitive functioning: Developmental and social class differences.Developmental Psychology, 19, 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopher, D., Brickner, M.,& Navon, D. (1982). Different difficulty manipulations interact differently with task emphasis: Evidence for multiple resources.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on the revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, L. M., & Kantowitz, B. H. (1970). The psychological refractory period effect: Only half the double-stimulation story?Psychological Bulletin, 73, 74–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J., Rosman, B. L., Day, B., Albert, J., & Phillips, W. (1964). Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes.Psychological Monographs,78 (1, Whole No. 578).

  • Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1982).Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. (1982).Experimental design: Procedures for behavioral sciences (pp. 832–839). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stage.Acta Psychologica, 32, 301–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, W. E., Atkins, M., & Murphy, H. A. (1981, September). ADD with and without hyperactivity: Parent, teacher, and peer rating correlates. In W. E. Pelham (Chair),DSM-III category of Attention Deficit Disorder: Rationale, operation, and correlates. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

  • Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention.Psychological Review, 78, 391–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, J. C., Werry, J. S., Elkind, G. S., & Zametkin, A. (1987). Attention deficit, conduct, oppositional, and anxiety disorders in children: II. Clinical characteristics.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 144–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (1967). A children's behaviour questionnaire for completion by teachers: Preliminary findings.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., & Graham, P. (1968). The reliability and validity of the psychiatric assessment of the child: I. Interview with the child.British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 563–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Tizard, J., & Whitmore, K. (1970).Education, health and behavior: Psychological and medical study of childhood development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., & Logan, G. (in press). Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology.Developmental Psychology.

  • Schachar, R., Logan, G., Wachsmuth, R., & Chajczyk, D. (1988). Attaining and maintaining preparation: A comparison of attention in hyperactive, normal, and disturbed control children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 361–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., Rutter, M., & Smith, A. (1981). The characteristics of situationally and pervasively hyperactive children: Implications for syndrome definition.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22, 375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., & Wachsmuth, R. (1990). Oppositional disorder in children: A validation study comparing conduct disorder, oppositional disorder, and normal control children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., & Scholten, C. A. (1985). On resource strategy limitations in hyperactivity: Cognitive impulsivity reconsidered.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szatmari, P., Offord, D. R., & Boyle, M. H. (1989). Ontario child health study: Prevalence of attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, A. T. (1952). The ‘psychological refractory period’ and the timing of high-speed performance: A review and a theory.British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, A. T. (1967). Single-channel operation in the brain.Acta Psychologica, 27, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, A. T. (1968).Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werry, J. S., Methven, R. J., Fitzpatrick, J., & Dixon, H. (1983). The interrater reliability of DSM-III in children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman, R. Davies, & J. Beatty (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 63–102). Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Russell Schachar or Gordon Logan.

Additional information

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Ontario Mental Health Foundation and the assistance of Diane Chajczyk. This paper was prepared with the assistance of Medical Publications, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schachar, R., Logan, G. Are hyperactive children deficient in attentional capacity?. J Abnorm Child Psychol 18, 493–513 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00911104

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00911104

Keywords

Navigation