Skip to main content
Log in

Correlates of child abuse potential

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coercion theory provided the theoretical rationale for the present study. The hypothesis was that mothers' reports of child behavior problems and mothers' reports of external locus of control would be related to abuse potential. A total of 95 mother-child pairs were screened for child abuse potential during visits to a hospital-based pediatrie clinic. Following brief interviews, mothers completed three measures: Milner's Child Abuse Potential Inventory, Levenson's Locus of Control Scales, and the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Perceptions of control by powerful others and by chance were related to abuse potential for mothers of both sexes. Mothers' reports of their sons' anxiety-withdrawal and conduct-disorder behavior problems were related to abuse potential. There was a significant association among lie scores, internality, and abuse potential for mothers of female children. Mothers with high abuse potential reported significantly more behavior problems in their children. The findings were discussed in relation to coercion theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bee, H. L., Disbrow, M. A., Johnson-Crowley, N., & Barnard, K. (1981, April).Parent-child interaction during teaching in abusing and nonabusing families. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.

  • Burgess, R. L., & Conger, R. D. (1978). Family interaction in abusive, neglectful, and normal families.Child Development, 49(4), 1163–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. F. (1981). Assessment of dysfunctional family systems. In B. Lashley & A. Kazdin (Eds.),Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 219–242). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, T. W. (1982). Sons, mothers, and externality: Is there a father effect?Child Study Journal, 12(4), 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. H., & Milner, J. S. (1981). Child abuse and locus of control.Psychological Reports, 48, 507–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, C., & Main, M. (1979). Social interactions of young abused children: Approach, avoidance and aggression.Child Development, 50(2), 306–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M., Cox, M., & Cox, R. (1981). The aftermath of divorce. In E. M. Hetherington & R. D. Parke (Eds.),Contemporary readings in child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 234–248). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M., & Martin, B. (1979). Family interaction. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.),Psychopathological disorders of childhood. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating among externality, powerful others and chance. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.),Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 1, pp. 15–63). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M., & Schaeffer, S. (1981). Peer behavior and mother-infant interaction in maltreated children. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.),The uncommon child (Vol. 1, pp. 193–223). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. A. (1981). A longitudinal study of the consequences of early mother-infant interaction: A microanalytic approach.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46(3, Serial No. 190).

  • Mash, E. J., Johnston, C., & Kovitz, K. (1983). A comparison of the mother-child interactions of physically abused and nonabused children during play and task situations.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12(3), 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. S. (1980).The child abuse potential inventory: Manual. Webster, North Carolina: Psytec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R. (1980). Mothers: The unacknowledged victims.Monographs of Society for Research in Child Development, 45(5, Serial No. 186).

  • Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process: A social learning approach (Vol. 3). Eugene: Castalia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, H. C. (1983). A dimensional approach to behavior disorder: The Revised Behavior Problem Checklist.School Psychology Review, 12, 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, H. C., & Peterson, D. R. (1983, April).Interim manual for the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. (Available from H. C. Quay, Box 248074, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33124.)

  • Reid, J. B., Patterson, G. R., & Loeber, R. (1981). The abused child: Victim, instigator, or innocent bystander?Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 29, 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, K. R., & Milner, J. S. (1983). Construct validity of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(3), 426–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966).Generalized expectancies for external versus internal control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs, 80(1, Whole No. 609).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stringer, S.A., La Greca, A.M. Correlates of child abuse potential. J Abnorm Child Psychol 13, 217–226 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00910643

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00910643

Keywords

Navigation