Abstract
Although the FACES has become a widely used instrument for assessing children's family relations, the possible linearity vs. curvilinearity of its cohesion and adaptability scales has been treated inconsistently by investigators. This study evaluated whether samples of adolescent repeat offenders, young adult prisoners, and adolescent nonoffenders were discriminated better by a linear or curvilinear treatment of the FACES scores. Between-groups comparisons showed that significant effects were observed for each of the three curvilinear measures (cohesion-curvilinear, adaptability-curvilinear, distance-from-center) and only one of the two linear measures (cohesionlinear). These findings support the superiority of a curvilinear treatment of the FACES. In light of these findings, it is suggested that investigators who use FACES evaluate the linearity of the scales and determine whether a linear or curvilinear treatment of the data produces more meaningful results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blaske, D. M., Borduin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., & Mann, B. J. (1989). Individual, family, and peer characteristics of adolescent sex offenders and assaultive offenders.Developmental Psychology, 25, 846–855.
Chaney, J. M., & Peterson, L. (1989). Family variables and disease management in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 14, 389–403.
Day, R. D., & Hooks, D. (1987). Miscarriage: A special type of family crisis.Family Relations, 36, 305–310.
Farrington, D. P. (1979). Longitudinal research on crime and delinquency. In N. Morris & M. Tonry (Eds.),Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 1, pp. 289–348). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, A. S., Utada, A., & Morrissey, M. R. (1987). Families of adolescent drug abusers are “rigid”: Are these families either “disengaged” or “enmeshed” or both?Family Process, 26, 131–148.
Fristad, M. A. (1989). A comparison of the McMaster and circumplex family assessment instruments.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 259–269.
Geismar, L. L., & Wood, K. (1986).Family and delinquency: Resocializing the young offender. New York: Human Sciences Press.
Griffiths, A. W., & Rundle, A. T. (1976). A survey of male prisoners: Some aspects of family background.British Journal of Criminology, 16, 348–365.
Green, R. G., Kolevzon, M. S., & Vosler, N. R. (1985). The Beavers-Timberlawn model of family competence and the circumplex model of family adaptability and cohesion: Separate, but equal?Family Process, 24, 385–398.
Hanson, C. L., Henggeler, S. W., Harris, M. A. Burghen, G. A., & Moore, M. (1989). Family system variables and the health status of adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.Health Psychology, 8, 239–253.
Henggeler, S. W. (1989).Delinquency in adolescence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Henggeler, S. W., & Borduin, C. M. (1990).Family therapy and beyond: A multisystemic approach to treating the behavior problems of children and adolescents. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Henggeler, S. W., Borduin, C. M., & Mann, B. J. (1987). Intrafamily agreement: Association with clinical status, social desirability, and observational ratings.Jounal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 8, 97–111.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1975).The four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Kazak, A. E., & Meadows, A. T. (1989). Families of young adolescents who have survived cancer: Social-emotional adjustment, adaptability, and social support.Journal of Pediatrie Psychology, 14, 175–191.
Loeber, R. (1982). The stability of antisocial and delinquent child behavior A review.Child Development, 53, 1431–1446.
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.),Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 1–101). New York: Wiley.
McGaha, J. E., & Fournier, D. G. (1987). Juvenile justice and the family: A systems approach to family assessment.Marriage and Family Review, 12, 155–172.
Minuchin, S., Montalvo, B., Guerney, B. G., Rosman, B. C., & Schumer, F. (1967).Families of the slums. New York: Basic Books.
Morrison, G. M., & Zetlin, A. (1988). Perceptions of communication, cohesion, and adaptability in families of adolescents with and without learning handicaps.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 675–685.
Olson, D. H., Bell, R., & Portner, J. (1978).Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.
Olson, D. H., Portner, J., & Bell, R. (1982). Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales. In D. H. Olson, H. I. McCubbin, H. L. Barnes, A. Larsen, M. Muxen, & M. Wilson,Family inventories (pp. 5–24). St. Paul: University of Minnesota, Department of Family Social Science.
Olson, D. H., Portner, J., & Lavee, Y. (1985).FACES-III. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, Department of Family Social Science.
Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: VI. Theoretical update.Family Process, 22, 69–83.
Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H., & Russell, C. S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications.Family Process, 18, 3–27.
Pink, J., & Wampler, K. S. (1985). Problem areas in stepfamilies: Cohesion, adaptability, and the stepfather-adolescent relationship.Family Relations, 34, 327–335.
Reppucci, N. D., & Clingempeel, W. G. (1978). Methodological issues in research with correctional populations.Journal of Consulting and Clinical psychology, 46, 727–746.
Rodick, J. D., Henggeler, S. W., & Hanson, C. L. (1986). An evaluation of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales and the circumplex model.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 77–87.
Shoham, S. G., Rahav, G., Markowski, R., Chard, F., Neuman, F., Behhaim, M., Baruch, L., Esformes, Y., Schwarzman, Z., Rubin, R., Mendick, S., & Buickhuisen, W. (1987). Family parameters of violent prisoners.Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 83–91.
Smets, A. C., & Hartup, W. W. (1988). Systems and symptoms: Family cohesion/adaptability and childhood behavior problems.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 233–246.
Tolan, P. (1988). Socioeconomic, family, and social stress correlates of adolescent antisocial and delinquent behavior.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 317–331.
Walker, L. S., & Greene, J. W. (1987). Negative life events, psychosocial resources, and psychophysiological symptoms in adolescents.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 16, 29–36.
West, D. J. (1982).Delinquency: Its roots, careers, and prospects. London: Heinemann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henggeler, S.W., Burr-Harris, A.W., Borduin, C.M. et al. Use of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales in child clinical research. J Abnorm Child Psychol 19, 53–63 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00910564
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00910564