Skip to main content
Log in

A qualitative understanding of reflective-teams II: Therapists' perspectives

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A research team developed and asked questions to a reflective-team about their clinical practice. The purpose of the questions was to better understand reflective-team members' experiences, beliefs, and aspirations. A participant/observation methodology was used in formulating the questions to the therapists. Therapists stated that reflective-teams were valuable in resolving impasses, developing multiple perspectives on clients' problems, and encouraging interaction among team members, but were problematic if clients were unaccustomed to team practice or if there were physically too many people in the interviewing room. Therapists believed that reflective-teams as a team practice was not practical in typical practice settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, T. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work.Family Process, 26, 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. (1990).The reflecting team: Dialogues and dialogues about the dialogues. United Kingdom: Borgman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory.Family Process, 27, 371–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H., Goolishian, H., & Winderman, L. (1986). Problem-determined systems: Toward transformation in family therapy.Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 5(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, R., Weakland, J. H., & Segal, L. (1982).The tactics of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983).Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1985). Beyond power and control.Family Systems Medicine, 3, 381–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1988). A constructivist position for family therapy.Irish Journal of Psychology, 9, 110–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joanning, H., Newfield, N., & Quinn, W. (1987). Multiple perspectives for research using family therapy to treat adolescent drug abuse.Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 6, 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, D. L. (1989).Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassis, J. P., & Matthews, W. J. (1987). When families and helpers do not want the mirror: A brief report of one team's experience.Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 6(4), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lax, W. (1989). Systemic family therapy with young children in the family: Use of the reflecting team.Journal of Psychotherapy and the Family, 5(3–4), 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, M. (1977). Heterogenistics: An epistemological restructuring of biological and social sciences.Cybernetica, 20, 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, C. L., Coddou, F., & Maturana, H. R. (1988). The bringing forth of pathology.The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9, 144–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Lax, W. D. (1988). Interrupting deadly struggles: A reflecting team model for working with couples.Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 7(3), 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S. M., Dillon, D. R., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1990). Family therapy and qualitative research.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16, 357–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1987).How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M., Caesar, L., Perryclear, B., & Phillips, D. (1989). Reflecting team consultations.Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 8(2–3), 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman, L., & Strauss, A.L. (1973).Field research. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: PrenticeHall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. E. (1991). Lie to me no more: Believable stories and marital affairs.Family Process, 30(2), 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. E., & Jenkins, D. (1991). Reflecting teams: Voices of diversity. Paper presented at the meeting of the Florida Association for Marriage and Family Therapy in Palm Beach Gardens, FL.

  • Smith, T. E., Yoshioka, M., & Winton, M. (1991). A qualitative understanding of reflecting teams I: Client perspectives. Paper submitted for review.

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1988).Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, T.E., Winton, M. & Yoshioka, M. A qualitative understanding of reflective-teams II: Therapists' perspectives. Contemp Fam Ther 14, 419–432 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00895057

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00895057

Keywords

Navigation