Skip to main content
Log in

Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Stimuli that reach the sensory surface may result in perception, or serve to guide action. How are these two potential consequences of sensory stimulation related? I discuss three aspects of this problem. Theconceptual aspect concerns the status of the concept of perception in an objective psychology. Themethodological aspect pertains to the problem of how psychophysics is related to the assessment of performance measures. Thefunctional aspect relates to the function(s) of perception for action control. I argue that (a) conceptually, the term perception belongs to a different level of description than the constructs of information-processing models; (b) methodologically, psychophysical judgements and performance measures are not necessarily converging operations; (c) functionally, sensory information can be used for the control of action without perception as a mediating stage (direct parameter specification). Taken together, this suggests that perception should be conceptualized not as a processing stage, but as a class of actions that serve to establish and update an internal representation of the enviroment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Averbach, E., & Coriell, A. S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision.Bell Systems Technical Journal, 40, 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, M. (1983). A comparison of reaction-time and temporal- orderjudgment estimates of latency to sinusoidal gratings.Perception, 12, 1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. H., Amundson, V. E., & Schurman, D. (1973). Metacontrast inferred from reaction time and verbal report: Replication and comment on the Fehrer-Biederman experiment.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 195–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bieri, P. (1990). Informational accounts of perception and action: Skeptical reflections. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.),Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 345–365). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, B. (1990). The physiological basis of the act of perceiving. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.),Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 21–42). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M., & Sperling, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion.Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 336–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, J., Latto, R., & Smith, Y. (1983). Is blindsight an effect of scattered light, spared cortex, and near-threshold vision?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 423–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M. (1990).Informationsverarbeitung und mentale Repräsentation. Die Analyse menschlicher kognitiver Fähigkeiten am Beispiel der visuellen Wahrnehmung. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, S. (1868).Über die zu einer Gesichtswahrnehmung nöthige Zeit. Sitzungsberichte der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien, mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Classe, 58, 2, 601–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehrer, E., & Biederman, I. (1962). A comparison of reaction time and verbal report in the detection of masked stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 126–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fehrer, E., & Raab, E. (1962). Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 143–147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1987).Psychosenuantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R., Hake, H. W., & Eriksen, C. W. (1956). Operationism and the concept of perception.Psychological Review, 63, 149–159.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1966).The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979).The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, R. N. (1969).Information processing approaches to visual perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijden, A. H. C. van der, & Stebbins, S. (1990). The information-processing approach.Psychological Research, 52, 197–206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, H. C., & Kelsey, J. V. (1984). Response-dependent effects on near-threshold detection performance: Saccades vs. manual responses.Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 543–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1968). Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking.Psychological Bulletin, 70, 404–425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, I. (1951).ÜberAufbau und Wandlungen der Wahrnehmungswelt. Vienna: Rohrer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, L. (1888). Neue Experimente über den Vorgang der einfachen Reaktion auf Sinneseindrücke.Philosophische Studien, 4, 479–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. N., & Young, D. S. (1986). Gearing action to the enviroment. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.),Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 217–230). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefton, L. A. (1973). Metacontrast: A review.Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 4 (Whole No. 62), 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes.Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayzner, M. S., & Tresselt, M. E. (1970). Visual infonnation processing with sequential inputs: A general model for sequential blanking, displacement, and overprinting phenomena.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 169, 599–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, C. F., & Carello, C. (1981).Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münsterberg, H. (1889). Beiträge zur experimentellen Psychologie, Heft 1. Freiburg: Akademische Verlagsbuchhandlung Mohr. Repr. in H. Hildebrandt & E. Scheerer (Eds.),Frühe Schriften. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1982).Experimente zum Fehrer-Raab-Effekt und das “Wetterwart”-Modell der visuellen Maskierung, Report No. 24. Psychologisches Institut der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Ar- beitseinheit Kognitionspsychologie.

  • Neumann, O. (1985). Informationsverarbeitung, Künstliche Intelligenz und die Perspektiven der Kognitionspsychologie. In O. Neumann (Ed.),Perspektiven der Kognitionspsychologie (pp. 3–37). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1987a).An evaluation of three concepts of consciousness. Report No. 150, Research Group on Perception and Action, Center for Interdisciplinary Studies (ZiF), Bielefeld (FRG).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1987b). Zur Funktion der selektiven Aufmerksamkeit für die Handlungssteuerung.Sprache und Kognition, 6, 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1989). Kognitive Vermittlung und direkte Parameterspezifikation. Zum Problem mentaler Representation in der Wahrnehmung.Sprache und Kognition, 8, 32–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1990). Visual attention and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.),Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 227–267). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O., & Müsseler, J. (1990a). Visuelles Fokussieren: Das Wetterwart-Modell und einige seiner Anwendungen. In C. Meinecke & L. Kehrer (Eds.),Bielefelder Beiträge zur Kognitionspsychologie (pp. 77–108). GGttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O., & Müsseler, J. (1990b). “Judgment” vs. “response”: A general problem and some experimental illustrations. In H. G. Geissler, M. Müller, & W. Prinz (Eds.),Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 445–455). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O., & Prinz, W. (1987). Kognitive Antezedenzien von Willkürhandlungen. In H. Heckhausen, P. M. Gollwitzer, & F. E. Weinert (Eds.),Jenseits des Rubikon: Der Wille in den Humanwissenschaften (pp. 195–215). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O., & Prinz, W. (1990). Historical approaches to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.),Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 5–19). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutschman, R., & Link, R. (1964). Perception of temporal order of stimuli differing in sense mode and simple reaction time.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18, 345–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949).The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A. F. (1971).Psychologie der Informationsverarbeitung. Berne, Stuttgart: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerer, E. (1973). Integration, interruption and processing rate in visual backward masking.Psychologische Forschung, 36, 71–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheerer, E. (1988). Towards a history of cognitive science.International Science Journal, 115, 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergent, J. (1987). A new look at the human split brain.Brain, 110, 1375–1392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949).The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations.Psychological Monographs, 74, (Whole No. 498).

  • Stigler, R. (1910). Chronophotische Studien über den Umgebungskontrast.Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie, 134, 365–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets, J. A. (1964) (Ed.).Signal detection and recognition by human observers. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli.Psychological Review, 80, 1–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., Reed, E. S., & Mace, W. M. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981).Cognition, 9, 237–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskrantz, L., Warrington, E. K., Sanders, M. D., & Marshall, J. (1974). Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation.Brain, 97, 709–728.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1882). Über psychologische Methoden.Philosophische Studien, 1, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1903).Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie (5th ed.) Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neumann, O. Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychol. Res 52, 207–215 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877529

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877529

Keywords

Navigation