Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal-order judgments and reaction time for stimuli of different modalities

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Reaction times and the relative latency evaluated by the temporal-order-judgment method for two stimuli of different modalities (visual and auditory) were measured. The difference between reaction times for visual and auditory stimuli was about 40 ms. The relative latency was slightly shorter, however; in conflict with Rutschmann and Link's (1964) previous result, the auditory stimulus must be delayed to be perceived simultaneously with the visual one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, L. G. (1975), The relationship between judgments of successiveness and judgment of order.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, L.G., & Kristofferson, A. B. (1974). Successiveness discrimination: Two models.Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, M., Brunk, H. D., Ewing, G. M., Reid, W. T., & Silverman, E. (1955). An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26, 641–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, M. (1983). A comparison of reaction-time and temporal-order-judgement estimates of latency to sinusoidal gratings.Perception, 12, A7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconic, P., & Efron, B. (1983). Computer-intensive methods in statistics.Scientific American, 248, 116–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Didner, R., & Sperling, G. (1980). Perceptual delay: A consequence of metacontrast and apparent motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception, 6, 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Gong, G. (1983). A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jacknife, and cross-validation.The American Statistician, 37, 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, B., & Churchman, C. W. (1944). On the statistics of sensitivity data.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 15, 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, I. J., & Sherrick, C. E. (1961). Perceived order in different sense modalities.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 423–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaśkowski, P. (1987). The effect of retinal location on simple motor reaction time and perceived simultaneity.Perception, 16, 208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristofferson, A. B. (1967a). Attention and psychophysical time.Acta Psychologica, 27, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristofferson, A. B. (1967b). Successiveness discrimination as a two-state quantal process.Science, 158, 1337–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 467–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menendez, A., & Lit, A. (1983). Effects of test-flash and steady background luminance on simple visual reaction time (RT) and perceived simultaneity (PS).Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 24, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roufs, J. A. J. (1974). Dynamic properties of vision. V: Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash threshold.Vision Research, 14, 853–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutschmann, J., & Link, R. (1964). Perception of temporal order of stimuli differing in sense mode and simple reaction time.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 18, 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1908). The method of “right and wrong cases” (“constant stimuli”) without Gauss's formulae.British Journal of Psychology, 2, 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S., & Knoll, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Komblum (Ed.).Attention and performance, 4. New York: Academic Press, pp. 629–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S., Knoll, R. L., & Zukofsky, P. (1982). Timing by skilled musicians. In D. Deutsch (Ed.),The psychology of music. New York: Academic Press, pp. 181–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. (1987). Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by ternary response task.Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 224–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R., Stapf, K. H. (1984). A double response paradigm to study stimulus intensity effects upon the motor system in simple reaction time experiments.Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 545–558.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaśkowski, P., Jaroszyk, F. & Hojan-Jezierska, D. Temporal-order judgments and reaction time for stimuli of different modalities. Psychol. Res 52, 35–38 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867209

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867209

Keywords

Navigation