Skip to main content
Log in

When does a choice of coping strategies help? The interaction of choice and locus of control

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Undergraduate student volunteers either were given a choice of coping strategies or were assigned to a coping strategy which was used to help them tolerate the cold pressor. Subjects who were given a choice of coping strategies reported their strategy to be more credible and perceived a greater sense of control than subjects who were not given a choice. Improved pain tolerance, however, did not result directly from being given a choice. Increases in pain tolerance depended on locus of control. Subjects who had a high internal health locus of control reported a greater strength of self-efficacy and demonstrated increased pain tolerance following a choice of strategies. In comparison, subjects who reported a more external health locus of control did not benefit from receiving a choice. This study has implications for our understanding of the role of choice in therapy and for improving the effectiveness of our interventions with individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I., and Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 22: 453–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akins, T., Hollandsworth, J. G., and O'Connell, S. J. (1982). Visual and verbal modes of information processing and their relation to the effectiveness of cognitively-based anxiety reduction techniques.Behav. Res. Ther. 20: 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmaier, E. M., Ross, S. L., Leary, M. R., and Thornbrough, M. (1982). Matching stress inoculation's treatment components to clients' anxiety mode.J. Counsel. Psychol. 29: 331–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R. (1973). Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress.Psychol. Bull. 80: 286–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., and Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change.Cognit. Ther. Res. 1: 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkovec, T. D., and Nau, S. D. (1972). Credibility of analog therapy rationales.J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiat. 3: 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1961). The repression-sensitization scale: Rationale, reliability, and validity.J. Personal. 29: 334–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, D. A., and Fernald, P. S. (1973). Outcome effects of receiving a preferred, randomly assigned, or nonpreferred therapy.J. Consult. Clinic. Psychol. 41: 104–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efran, J. S., Chorney, R. L., Ascher, L. M., and Lukens, M. D. (1989). Coping styles, paradox and the cold pressor task.J. Behav. Med. 12: 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow, R. E., Klepac, R. K., Dowling, J., and Rokke, P. D. (1982). Measures of self-efficacy in pain tolerance. Paper presented at the annual AABT Convention, Los Angeles, CA, November.

  • Gordon, R. M. (1976). Effects of volunteering and responsibility on the perceived value and effectiveness of a clinical treatment.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 44: 799–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, F. H., and Grimm, L. G. (1978). Freedom of choice and behavioral change.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 44: 373–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1973).Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., and Folkman, S. (1984).Stress, Appraisal, and Coping, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litt, M. D. (1988a). Cognitive mediators of stressful experience: Self-efficacy and perceived control.Cognit. Ther. Res. 12: 241–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litt, M. D. (1988b). Self-efficacy and perceived control: Cognitive mediators of pain tolerance.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 54: 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martelli, M. F., Auerbach, S. M., Alexander, J., and Mercuri, L. G. (1987). Stress management in the health care setting: Matching interventions with patient coping styles.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 55: 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaul, K. D., and Malott, J. M. (1984). Distraction and coping with pain.Psychol. Bull. 95: 516–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. (1975). The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods.Pain 1: 277–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendonca, P. J., and Brehm, S. S. (1983). Effects of choice on behavioral treatment of over-weight children.J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 1: 343–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (1979). Controllability and human stress: Method, evidence and theory,Behav. Res. Ther. 17: 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 52: 345–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, A. (1985). Self-efficacy and health.Behav. Res. Ther. 23: 437–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phares, E. J. (1978). Locus of control. In London, H., and Exner, J. E. (eds.),Dimensions of Personality, Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, C., and Clum, G. A. (1982). Comparative treatment strategies and their interaction with locus of control in the reduction of postsurgical pain and anxiety.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 50: 439–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokke, P. D., and Lall, R. (in press). The role of choice in enhancing tolerance to acute pain.Cognit. Ther. Res.

  • Strickland, B. R. (1977). Internal-external control of reinforcement. In Bass, T. (ed.),Personality Variables in Social Behavior. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, B. R. (1989). Internal-external control expectancies: From Contingency to creativity.Am. Psychol. 44: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S. (1982). Cognitive and cognitive-behavioral methods for pain control: A selective review.Pain 12: 201–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. C. (1981). Will it hurt less if I can control it? a complex answer to a simple question.Psychol. Bull. 90: 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk, D. C., Meichenbaum, D., and Genest, M. (1983).Pain and Behavioral Medicine: A Cognitive-Behavioral Perspective, Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. A., and Chapman, C. R. (1982). Psychological interventions for chronic pain: A critical review. II. Operant conditioning, hypnosis, and cognitive-behavioral therapy,Pain 12: 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallston, K. A., Wallston, B. S., and DeVellis, R. (1978). Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scales.Health Educ. Monogr. 6: 160–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rokke, P.D., Absi, M.A., Lall, R. et al. When does a choice of coping strategies help? The interaction of choice and locus of control. J Behav Med 14, 491–504 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845106

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845106

Key words

Navigation