Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of the quality of life in depression scale in a population of adult depressive patients aged 60 and above

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of the Dutch version of the Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) in a population of depressive patients aged 60 years and over, who were seen on an outpatient basis by psychiatrists in the Flemish region of Belgium. A sample of severely depressive patient was followed during an height-week medical treatment. During this period, each patient was evaluated four times with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and with the QLDS. We observed that the QLDS was very sensitive to the failing of the quality of life in depressive states. The QLDS was also a very good measure of change during the improvement of depressives states. Furthermore, the scale appears to be very homogeneous across the depressive states range. The results are very encouraging, and constitute strong corroboration of the construct validity of the scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prussof B, Klerman G, Paykel E. Concordance between clinical assessments and patients' self report in depression.Archives of General Psychiatry 1972;26: 556–542.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hunt SM, McKenna SP. The QLDS: a scale for measurement of quality of life in depression.Health Policy 1992;22: 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hunt SM, McKenna SP. A new measure of quality of life in depression: testing the reliability and construct validity of the QLDS.Health Policy 1192;22: 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tyunman-Qua H, DeJonghe F, McKenna SM, Hunt SP.Quality of Life in Depression Rating Scale. Houten, Netherlands: Izcro Publ.; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dupuy H. The Psychological General Well-Being Index. In: Wenger N, eds.Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. New York: Le Jacq, 1984: 170–183.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hamilton M. Standardized assessment and recording of depressive symptomes.Psychiatrica Neurologia Neurochirurgia 1969;72: 201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.R.E.A., A.P.A., N.C.M.E..Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anastasi A. Evolving concepts of test validation.Annual Review of Psychology 1986;37: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crocker L, Algina J.Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Orlando: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. American Psychiatric Association.DSM-III-R. Manuel diagnostique et statistique des troubles mentaux. Paris: Masson, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bech P, Kastrup M, Rafaelsen OJ.Echelles d'évaluation des états d'anxiété, de dépression, de manie, de schizophrénie. Paris: Masson, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 1959;16: 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grégoire, J., de Leval, N., Mesters, P. et al. Validation of the quality of life in depression scale in a population of adult depressive patients aged 60 and above. Qual Life Res 3, 13–19 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00647844

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00647844

Key words

Navigation