Abstract
This paper utilizes data from the 1981 Canadian Time Use Pilot Study and from a small Halifax time-budget study to look at subjective and contextual dimensions of leisure for women and men. The Canadian study (n=2685) had information on the time spent in daily activities as well as on the settings and social contexts of those activities. The Halifax study included similar time-budget information on 60 married couples, but also incorporated subjective ratings of all diary events in terms of perceived work or leisure. Using subjective weightings from the Halifax study, estimates of subjective leisure were made for different categories of daily activity and for different Canadian population subgroups. Hypercodes were used to look at the effect of social roles on leisure time, and the AID procedure was used to analyze the contextual dimensions of leisure for men and women. The results show that objective activity and well as subjective leisure vary by population subgroup. Constraints to leisure include being female, being employed, having children, and, to some degree, being married. Of the contextual dimensions, subjective leisure was shown to be influenced primarily by type of objective activity. Location, time of day and day of the week also influenced leisure designations, but to a lesser extent. This study suggests the potential usefulness of subjective weightings of activities in order to gain a greater understanding of leisure patterns and participation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cheek, N. H. and W. R. Burch: 1976, The Social Organization of Leisure in Human Society (Harper and Row, New York).
Clark, Susan M., David H. Elliott and Andrew S. Harvey: 1982, ‘Hypercodes and composite variables: Simple techniques for the reduction and analysis of time budget data’, It's About Time, Proceedings of the International Research Group on Time Budgets and Social Activities, Sofia.
Csikszentmihayli, M.: 1975, Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The Experience of Play on Work and Games (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
DeGrazia, Sebastian: 1964, Of Time, Work and Leisure (Anchor Books, Garden City, N. Y.).
Dumazedier, Joffre: 1974, Sociology of Leisure (Elsevier, Amsterdam).
Farina, John: 1973, ‘Towards a philosophy of leisure’, in Leisure in Canada (Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa), 3–16.
Harvey, Andrew S.: 1978, ‘Discretionary time activities in context’, Occasional Papers, Institute of Public Affairs, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Iso-Ahola, Seppo E.: 1980a, The Social Psychology of Leisure and Recreation (Wm. D. Brown, Dubuque, Iowa).
Kaplan, Max: 1960, Leisure in America (John Wiley, New York).
Kelly, John R.: 1974, ‘Sociological perspectives and leisure research’, Current Sociology 22, 1–3, 127–58.
Kelly, John R.: 1980, ‘Leisure and quality: Beyond the quantitative barrier in research’, in T. L. Goodale and P. A. Witt (eds.). Recreation and Leisure: Issues in an Era of Change. (Venture Publishing, State College, Penn.), 300–314.
Kinsley, Brian and Terry O'Donnel: 1983, Marking Time: Explorations in Time Use (Canada Employment and Immigration Commission, Ottawa).
Kirsh, C., B. Dixon and M. Bond: 1974, A Leisure Study-Canada 1972 (Published for the Arts and Culture Branch, Department of Secretary of State by A.E. Design and Cultural Publications, Toronto, Ontario).
Lundberg, G. A., M. Komarovsky and M. A. Mclnerny: 1934, Leisure: A Suburban Study (Columbia University Press, New York).
Neulinger, John: 1974, The Psychology of Leisure (Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois).
Neulinger, John: 1981b, To Leisure: An Introduction (Allyn and Bacon, Boston).
Parker, Stanley: 1972, The Future of Work and Leisure (Granada, London).
Pieper, Josef: 1952, Leisure: The Basis of Culture (Random House, New York).
Samdahl, Diane M.: 1988, ‘A symbolic interactionist model of leisure: Theory and empirical support’, Leisure Studies 22(1): 27–39.
Schliewen, Rolf E.: 1977, A Leisure Study — Canada 1975 (Department of the Secretary of State, Ottawa).
Shaw, Susan: 1982, The Sexual Division of Leisure: Meanings, Perceptions and the Distribution of time (Ph.D. thesis, Carleton University).
Shaw, Susan M.: 1986, ‘Leisure recreation or free time? Measuring time usage’, Journal of Leisure Research 18(3): 177–89.
Sonquist, John and James Morgan: 1964, The Detection of Interaction Effects (Survey Research Centre, University of Michigan).
Szalai, A. (ed.): 1972, The use of Time: Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries (The Hague: Mouton).
Troldahl, V. and Ray E. Carter: 1971, ‘Random selection of respondents within households in phone surveys’, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, S.M., Harvey, A.S., Shaw, S.M. et al. Time use and leisure: Subjective and objective aspects. Soc Indic Res 23, 337–352 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572528
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572528