Abstract
In this paper, methodologies which have been used in the pharmaceutical industry to demonstrate the equivalence of drug preparations, are applied to the measurement of quality of life (QOL). This approach is feasible when the generated data are measured on the same scale. Data from the quality of life instruments are transformed into interval scales by means of an appropriate scaling procedure. It is demonstrated that equivalence of QOL instruments is linked by a linear relationship between the QOL instruments Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) and the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC). The linear relationship is derived using orthogonal least squares regression which takes into account that both measures are subject to error.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ- C30: A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Nat Cancer Inst 1993; 85(5): 365–376.
Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Levitt M. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The Functional Living Index-Cancer: Development and validation. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2: 472–483.
Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) Scale: Development and validation of the general version. J Clin Oncol 1993; 3: 570–579.
Schag CAC, Ganz P, Heinrich RL. Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System—Short Form: A cancer specific rehabilitation and quality of life instrument. Cancer 1991; 68: 1406–1413.
Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J, et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: A concise QOL-Index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis 1981; 34: 585–597.
Zubrod CG, Schneiderman M, Frei E, et al. Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide. J Chronic Dis 1960; 11: 7–33.
Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. Clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod CM, ed. Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. New York: Columbia University Press, 1949: 191–205.
Fishman B, Pasternak S, Wallenstein MS, Houde RW, Holland JC, Foley KM. The Memorial Pain Assessment Card: A valid instrument for the evaluation of cancer pain. Cancer 1987; 60: 1151–1158.
Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin brief pain questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain 1983; 17: 197–210.
Andrich D. Scaling attitude items constructed and scored in the Likert tradition. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1978; 38: 665–680.
Andrich D. A model for contingency tables having an ordered response classification. Biometrics 1979; 35: 403–415.
Wright BD and Linacre JM. A user's guide to BIGSTEPS Rasch model computer program version 2.1. Chicago: Mesa Press, 1991.
Wright BD and Stone MH. Best Test Design. Chicago: Mesa Press, 1979.
Wright BD and Masters GN. Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chicago: Mesa Press, 1982.
Spitzer RL, Cohen J, Fleiss JL and Endicott J. Quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1967; 17: 83–87.
Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in Medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983; 32: 307–317.
Hauck WW, Anderson S. A proposal for interpreting and reporting negative studies. Statis in Med 1986; 5: 203–209.
Westlake WJ. Biovailability and bioequivalence of pharmaceutical formulations. In: Peace KE, ed. Biopharmaceutical Statistics for Drug Development. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1988: 329–352.
Jackson JD and Dunlevy JA. Orthogonal least squares and the interchangeability of alternative proxy variables in the social sciences. Statistician 1988; 37: 7–14.
Anderson PO. Large sample and jackknife procedures for small sample orthogonal least squares inference. Communications in Stat 1975; 4: 193–202.
Feldmann U, Schneider B, Klinkers H. A multivariate approach for the biometric comparison of analytic methods in clinical chemistry. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1981; 19: 121–137.
Efron B. The jackknife the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Philadelphia: SIAM Press, 1982: 27–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This investigation was supported by Grant R29CA51926, awarded by the National Cancer Institute.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonin, R., Lloyd, S. & Cella, D. Establishing equivalence between scaled measures of quality of life. Qual Life Res 5, 20–26 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435965
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435965