Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring quality of life in hospice patients using a newly developed Hospice Quality of Life Index

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the newly developed Hospice Quality of Life Index (HQLI). Sixty-eight patient/caregiver dyads from one hospice were asked to fill out the HQLI on admission and after 3 weeks of hospice care. Hospice experts evaluated the items on the tool to assess content validity. The content validity index (0.83) and the alpha coefficients (r=0.87 and 0.83) supported the validity and reliability of the HQLI. Item analysis revealed items with which patients were most satisfied and aspects of quality of life that were considered to be most important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mor V. Cancer patients' quality of life over the disease course: lessons from the real world. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 535–544.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kane RL, Klein SJ, Bernstein L, Rothenberg R, Wales J. Hospice role in alleviating the emotional stress of terminal patients and their families. Med Care 1985; 23: 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McMillan SC, Mahon M. Assessment of quality of life in hospice patients. Cancer Nurs, 1994; 17.

  4. Morris JN, Sherwood S. Quality of life of cancer patients at different stages in the disease trajectory. J Chronic Dis 1957; 40: 545–553.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morris JN, Suissa S, Sherwood S, Wright SM, Greer D. Last days: a study of the quality of life of terminally ill cancer patients. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jennings BM, Muhlenkamp AF. Systematic misperception: oncology patients' self-reported affective states and their caregivers' perceptions. Cancer Nurs 1981; 4: 485–489.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aaronson NK, Bullinger M, Ahmedzai S. A modular approach to quality-of-life assessment in cancer trials. Rec Res Cancer Res 1988; 111: 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Curtis AE, Fernsler JI. Quality of life of oncology hospice patients: a comparison of patient and primary care givear reports. Oncol Nurs Forum 1989; 16: 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrans CE. Development of a quality of life index for patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1990; 17(suppl): 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Padilla GV, Presant C, Grant MM, et al. Quality of life index for patients with cancer. Res Nurs Health 1983; 6: 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karnofsky DA, Abelmann WH, Craver LF, et al. The use of the nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma. Cancer 1948; 1: 634–656.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zubrod CG, Schneiderman M, Frei E, et al. Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide. J Chronic Dis 1960; 11: 703.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frank-Stromberg M. Selecting an instrument to measure quality of life. Oncol Nurs Forum 1984; 11: 88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrans CE, Powers MJ. Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties. Adv Nurs Sci 1985; 8: 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herth KA. The relationship between level of hope and level of coping response and other variables in patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1989; 16: 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dobratz MC, Wade R, Herbst L, Ryndes T. Pain efficacy in home hospice patients: a longitudinal study. Cancer Nurs 1991; 14: 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cassileth BR, Lusk EJ, Walsh WP. Anxiety levels in patients with malignant disease. Hospice J 1986; 2: 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perry GR. Loneliness and coping among tertiary-level adult cancer patients in the home. Cancer Nurs 13: 293–302.

  19. Brockopp DY, Hayko D, Davenport W, Winscott C. Personal control and the needs for hope and information among adults diagnosed with cancer. Cancer Nurs 1989; 12: 112–116.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sodestrom KE, Martinson IM. Patients' spiritual coping strategies: a study of nurse and patient perspectives. Oncol Nurs Forum 1987; 14: 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reed PG. Religiousness among terminally ill and healthy adults. Res Nurs Health 1986; 9: 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reed PG. Spirituality and well-being in terminally ill hospitalized adults. Res Nurs Health 1987; 10: 335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Clipp EC, George LK. Patients with cancer and their spouse caregivers: perceptions of the illness experience. Cancer 1992; 69: 1074–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Masters M, Shontz FC. Identification of problems and strengths of the hospice client by clients, caregivers, and nurses. Cancer Nurs 1989; 12: 226–235.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Nursing, University of South Florida, MDC Box 22, 33712, Tampa, FL, USA

    S. C. McMillan

  2. Hospice of Southwest Florida, Sarasota, FL, USA

    M. Mahon

Authors
  1. S. C. McMillan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Mahon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMillan, S.C., Mahon, M. Measuring quality of life in hospice patients using a newly developed Hospice Quality of Life Index. Qual Life Res 3, 437–447 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435396

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435396

Key words

Search

Navigation