Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of life and psychosocial status in stage D prostate cancer

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inasmuch as treatments for advanced prostate cancer may have identical clinical outcomes but very different meanings to patients, we sought to compare the impact of surgical and medical castration (orchiectomy versus injected goserelin acetate Zoladex®) on quality of life and psychosocial status. A total of 147 men with Stage D prostate cancer participated in the study: 115 selected treatment with goserelin acetate, and 32 chose orchiectomy. Quality of life, as measured by the Functional Living Index: Cancer (FLIC), improved at both the 3 and the 6 month follow-up in the goserelin acetate group (p=0.0001), but did not change from baseline at 6 months in the orchiectomy group (p=0.54). These findings were paralleled by improvement from baseline in psychosocial status, as measured by the Profile of Mood States (POMS), at 6 month follow-up (p=0.01 in the goserelin acetate group versus p=0.60 in the orchiectomy group). This investigation, which is among the first to evaluate patients' appraisals of their lives following treatment choices for advanced prostatic cancer, argues compellingly for including quality of life in assessments of therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures—1992, Atlanta, ACS, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peeling WB. Phase III studies to compare goserelin (Zoladex®) with orchiectomy and with diethylstilbestrol in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma. Urology 1989; 33(suppl 5): 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cassileth BR, Soloway MS, Vogelzang NJ, et al. Patients' choice of treatment in stage D prostate cancer. Urology 1989; 33(suppl 5): 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson JR, Temple R. Food and Drug Administration requirements for approval of new anticancer drugs. Cancer Treat Rep 1985; 69: 1155–1157.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tannock I, Gospodarowicz M, Meakin W, et al. Treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer with low-dose prednisone: evaluation of pain and quality of life as pragmatic indices of response. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 590–597.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Presant CA, Soloway MS, Klioze SS, et al. Buserelin treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma. Long-term follow-up of antitumor response and improved quality of life. Cancer 1987; 59: 1713–1716.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parmar H, Phillips RH, Lightman SL, Edwards L. How would you like to have an orchiectomy for advanced prostatic cancer? Am J Clin Oncol (CCT) 1988: 11 (suppl 2): S160-S168.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith JAJr. Palliation of painful bone metastases from prostate cancer using sodium etidronate: results of a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Urol 1989; 141: 85–87.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fowler FJ, Wennberg JE, Timothy RP, et al. Symptom status and quality of life following prostatectomy. JAMA 1988; 259: 3018–3022.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Levitt M. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the functional living index—cancer. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2: 472–483.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cassileth BR, Lusk EJ, Brown LL, Cross PA. Psychosocial status of cancer patients and next of kin: normative data from the Profile of Mood States. J Psychosoc Oncol 1985; 3: 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Selby P, Robertson B. Measurement of quality of life in patients with cancer. Cancer Surv 1987; 6: 521–543.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barofsky I, Sugarbaker PH. Cancer. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. New York: Raven Press, 1990: 419–439.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shumaker SA, Anderson RT, Czajkowski SM. Psychological tests and scales. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life Assessments In Clinical Trials. New York: Raven Press, 1990: 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aaronson NK. The assessment of subjective response in prostatic cancer clinical research. Am J Clin Oncol 1988; 11(suppl 2): S43-S47.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fosså SD, Aaronson NK, Newling D, et al. Quality of life and treatment of hormone resistant metastatic prostatic cancer. Eur J Cancer 1990; 26: 1133–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Presant CA, Soloway MS, Klioze SS, et al. Buserelin treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma. Long-term follow-up of antitumor response and improved quality of life. Cancer 1987; 59: 1713–1716.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kiebert GM, deHaes JCJM, van deVelde CJH. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 1059–1070.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassileth, B.R., Soloway, M.S., Vogelzang, N.J. et al. Quality of life and psychosocial status in stage D prostate cancer. Qual Life Res 1, 323–330 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434946

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434946

Key words

Navigation