Skip to main content
Log in

Contrasting interactions of pipradrol, d-amphetamine, cocaine, cocaine analogues, apomorphine and other drugs with conditioned reinforcement

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of various psychomotor stimulant drugs and drugs outside this class were examined on the efficacy of stimuli previously paired with reinforcement or reward (conditioned reinforcers, CR) in controlling responding. Pipradrol (5–45 μmol/kg), d-amphetamine (1.25–15.0 μmol/kg), and the cocaine analogues WIN 35,428 (0.1–30.0 μmol/kg) and in one of two determinations WIN 35,065-2 (0.1–29.0 μmol/kg) all generally increased responding on a lever providing CR, but did not change or decreased responding on a lever providing no CR (NCR). Cocaine (5–125 μmol/kg) and chlordiazepoxide (3.75–60.0 μmol/kg) had no significant effects. Morphine (3.2–32.0 μmol/kg) and α-flupenthixol (0.02–2.0 μmol/kg) generally reduced responding on both levers. Apomorphine (0.1–1.0 μmol/kg) generally increased responding on both levers. Neurochemical data showed that d-amphetamine was generally more potent than pipradrol in its effects on in vitro monoamine uptake and release.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beninger RJ, Hanson DR, Phillips AG (1980) The effects of pipradrol on the acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: A role for sensory preconditioning. Psychopharmacology 69:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RJ, Hanson DR, Phillips AG (1981) The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: Effects of cocaine (+)-amphetamine and pipradrol. Br J Pharmacol 74:149–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown BB, Werner HW (1954) Pharmacological studies on a central stimulant: 1-(2-piperidyl)-benzhydrol hydrochloride (MRD-108). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 110:180–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher LL (1968) Effects of apomorphine on free-operant avoidance behaviour in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol 3:163–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow TJ (1976) Specific monoamine systems as reward pathways: Evidence for the hypothesis that activation of the ventral mesencephalic dopaminergic neurones and noradrenergic neurones of the locus coeruleus complex will support self-stimulation responding. In: Wauquier A, Rolls ET (eds) Brain stimulation reward. North Holland-Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 211–235

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Mello GD, Goldberg DM, Goldberg SR, Stolerman IP (1981) Conditioned taste aversion and operant behavior in rats: Effects of cocaine, apomorphine and some long-lasting derivatives. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 219:60–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis C, Kemp JD, Cox B (1981) Characterisation of inhibitory 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors that modulate dopamine release in the striatum. J Neurochem 36:1515–1520

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris RM, Tang FLM, Maxwell RA (1972) A comparison of the capacities of isomers of amphetamine, deoxypipradrol and methylphenidate to inhibit the uptake of triatiated catecholamines into rat cerebral cortex slices, synaptosomal preparations of rat cortex, hypothalamus and striatum and into adrenergic nerves of rabbit aorta. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 181:407–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Fog R (1969) Stereotyped and non-stereotyped behaviour in rats induced by various stimulant drugs. Psychopharmacologia 14:299–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray EG, Whittaker VP (1962) The isolation of nerve endings from brain: An electron microscope study of cell fragments derived by homogenisation and centrifugation. J Anat 96:79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JA (1977) Drug effects on fear and frustration: Possible limbic site of action of minor tranquilizers. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 8. Plenum, New York, pp 433–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila RE, Cabbat FA, Manzino L, Duvoisin RC (1979) Rotational behavior induced by cocaine analogues in rats with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the substantia nigra. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 211:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Herberg LJ, Stephens DN, Franklin KBJ (1976) Catecholamines and self-stimulation: Evidence suggesting a reinforcing role for noradrenaline and a motivating role for dopamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 4:575–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RT (1970) Facilitation of conditioned reinforcement as a mechanism of psychomotor stimulation. In: Costa E, Garattini S (eds) Amphetamines and related compounds. Raven, New York, pp 781–795

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPhail RC, Seiden LS (1975) Time course for the effects of cocaine on fixed-ratio water responding in rats. Psychopharmacologia 44:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore KE (1978) Amphetamines: Biochemical and behavioural actions in animals. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 11. Plenum, New York, pp 41–98

    Google Scholar 

  • deOliviera L, Graeff FG (1972) Comparison between the effects of apormorphine and amphetamine on operant behaviour. Eur J Pharmacol 18:159–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley RM, Baker HF, Haystead TAJ (1981) Perseverative behaviour after amphetamine: Dissociation of response tendency from reward association. Psychopharmacology 75:283–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW (1976) Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs. Nature 264:57–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW (1978) The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: Effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine. Psychopharmacology 58:79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW, Koob GF (1978) Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 8:219–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1982) Functional studies of the central catecholamines. Int Rev Neurobiol 23:303–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheel-Krüger J (1971) Comparative studies of various amphetamine analogues demonstrating different interactions with the metabolism of the catecholamines in the brain. Eur J Pharmacol 14:47–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Spealman RD, Goldberg SR, Kelleher RT, Goldberg DM, Charlton JP (1977) Some effects of cocaine and two cocaine analogues on schedule-controlled behavior of squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 202:500–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Voigtlander PF, Moore KE (1973) Involvement of nigrostriatal neurons in the in vivo release of dopamine by amphetamines, amantadine and tyramine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 184:542–552

    Google Scholar 

  • White TD, Keen P (1970) The role of internal and external Na+ and K+ on the uptake of 3H-noradrenaline by synaptosomes prepared from rat brain. Biochem Biophys Acta 196:285–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw Hill-Kogakusha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robbins, T.W., Watson, B.A., Gaskin, M. et al. Contrasting interactions of pipradrol, d-amphetamine, cocaine, cocaine analogues, apomorphine and other drugs with conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 80, 113–119 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427952

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427952

Key words

Navigation