Summary
This paper explores how people represent spatial information involving two perspectives associated with characters who share the same environment. Subjects first learned a narrative that described a scene with eight landmarks surrounding two characters who had the same or different perspective. Afterwards, subjects were given blocks of three-sentence items to be read at their own pace. The first two sentences guided the reader's attention to one character, while the third sentence described a spatial relation between a character and a landmark; subjects had to verify whether the relation was true or false. The results showed that it took longer to verify sentences after learning two-perspective narratives than it did with those of one perspective, and after reading items involving two characters rather than one. Both effects were significant and independent. To explain the perspective effect, it is proposed that subjects build a single perspective-free mental model that is instantiated as a particular perspective when necessary. The character effect has to do with modeling the characters' nonspatial traits. Finally, spatial skills were a predictor of subjects' performance, indicating individual differences in modeling efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1983). The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 427–440.
Black, J. B., Turner, E., & Bower, G. H. (1979). Point of view in narrative comprehension memory and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 187–198.
Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., & Franklin, N. (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 74–98.
Denis, M. (1991). Image and cognition. New York: Harvester Wheat-sheaf.
Denis, M., & Cocude, M. (1992). Structural properties of visual images constructed from poorly or well-structured verbal descriptions. Memory & Cognition, 20, 5, 497–506.
Denis, M., & de Vega, M. (1993). Modèles mentaux et imagerie mentale. In M. F. Ehrlich, H. Tardieu, & M. Cavazza (Eds.), Les modèles mentaux. Approche cognitive des représentations. Paris: Masson.
Finke, R. (1980). Levels of equivalence in imagery and perception. Psychological Review, 87, 113 -132.
Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63–76.
Franklin, N., Tversky, B., & Coon, V. (1992). Switching points of view in spatial mental models. Memory & Cognition, 20, 5, 507–518.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Linden, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83.
Haberlandt, K., & Graesser, A. C. (1985). Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 3, 357–374.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information. Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 47–60.
Morrow, D. G. (1985). Prominent characters and events organize narrative understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 304–319.
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and language, 26, 165–187.
Oakhill, J. V., Garnham, A., & Vonk, W. (1989). The on-line construction of discourse models. Cognition, 31, 117–140.
Poltrock, S. E., & Brown, P. (1984). Individual differences in visual imagery and spatial ability. Intelligence, 8, 93–138.
Sanford, A. J., Moar, K., & Garrod, S. C. (1988). Proper names as controllers of discourse focus. Language and Speech, 31, 43–56.
Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 2, 261–292.
Tversky, B. (1991). Spatial mental models. In G. H. Bower (Ed.) The Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 27). New York: Academic Press.
de Vega, M. (1990). Mental models: A general framework of discourse reference. Technical Report. University of La Laguna.
de Vega, M. (1992). Mental models of characters in spatial scenes. Paper presented in the Fifth Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology. Paris, September 1992.
Yela, M. (1974). Rompecabezas impreso. Madrid. TEA Ediciones, S. A.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Vega, M. Characters and their perspectives in narratives describing spatial environments. Psychol. Res 56, 116–126 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419719
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419719