Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive processing rates among disabled and normal reading young adults: A nine year follow-up study

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forty adults who had been diagnosed as reading disabled when they were children and 40 adults from a matched control group of normal readers were tested to assess the diagnostic utility of a newly developed set of tests as well at to ascertain whether or not reading disability persists into early adulthood. The new measures, designed to examine cognitive processing rates in disabled and normal adult readers, included expressive verbal fluency, confrontation naming, and perceptual speed. Evidence for significantly slower cognitive processing rates and persistent problems in reading and spelling was apparent among the young adult disabled readers. Spatial and mathematical ability levels were well within the normal range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker L. M., Decker S. N. and DeFries J. C. 1984. Cognitive abilities in reading-disabled children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 25, 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker S. N. and DeFries J. C. 1980. Cognitive abilities in families of reading-disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 517–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker S. N. and DeFries J. C. 1981. Cognitive ability profiles in families of reading-disabled children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 23, 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denckla M. B. and Rudel R. G. 1976. Rapid ‘automatized” naming: Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn L. N. and Markwardt F. S. 1970. Examiner's manual: Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon H. W. 1980. Cognitive asymmetry in dyslexic families. Neuropsychologia, 18, 645–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison D. F. 1976. Multivariate statistical methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie N. H. Hull C. H., Jenkins J. G., Steinbrenner K. and Bent D. H. 1975. Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler D., Liberman I. Y., Mark L. S., Fowler C. A. and Fischer F. W. 1979. The speech code and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 531–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass J. and Vanderwart M. 1980. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 174–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen O. 1982. Adult outcome of reading disorders. In R. N. Malatesha and P. G. Aaron (eds), Reading disorders: Varieties and treatments. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone T. G. 1963. Examiner's manual: Primary Mental Abilities Test. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler D. 1974. The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (4th ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig E. H. and Semel E. M. 1976. Language disabilities in children and adolescents. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Decker, S.N. Cognitive processing rates among disabled and normal reading young adults: A nine year follow-up study. Read Writ 1, 123–134 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377466

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377466

Keywords

Navigation