Summary
Several issues pertaining to the notion of global precedence, its testing, and its ecological validity are discussed. Global precedence is presented as a claim that, other things being equal, global structure is available in the percept earlier than local features are. It does not state that local processing starts only after global processing is terminated. Since global precedence is a hypothesis about temporal development of percepts, a natural way to test it is to limit exposure duration. Global precedence predicts that local features will be more sensitive to stimulus duration than global ones.
An experiment is reported in which subjects were presented with 150 ms exposures of large letters made up of small ones, and had to discriminate either just the large letters or just the small ones. In addition, they had to respond to the presence of a concurrent tone. Local letters were responded to more slowly than global ones, and were associated with more tone errors. The variation of the global level as well as the consistency between the identities of the levels affected the latency to the local letter, but not vice versa. A single small-letter control-condition was used to rule out an explanation in terms of relative size. The effects, albeit weaker than some previous results, are compatible with the hypothesis tested.
The results of this experiment are interpreted in the context of an extensive discussion of findings in the paradigm and the generality of the phenomenon assumed to underly them. Possible mechanisms which may mediate global precedence are evaluated. Among them are relative size, lateral masking, diffuse attention, and spatial uncertainty. The magnitude, or even the presence, of global precedence depends on some factors, most prominent of which are visual angle and retinal position. Ecological considerations suggest that proximal sizes and eccentricities which favor global features may be very frequent. Some further subtleties of, as well as problems with, the logic of compound letters are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bouma H (1971) Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vis Res 11:459–474
Breitmeyer BG (1975) Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels. Vis Res 15:1411–1412
Broadbent DE (1977) The hidden pre-attentive processes. Am Psychol 32:109–118
Broadbent DE, Broadbent MHP (1976) General shape and local detail in word perception. In: Dornic S (ed) Attention and performance VI. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Eriksen CW, Hoffman JE (1972) Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Percept Psychophys 12:201–204
Eriksen CW, Schultz D (1977) Retinal locus and acuity in visual information processing. Bull Psychonom Soc 9:81–84
Eriksen CW, Schultz D (1979) Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Percept Psychophys 25:249–263
Estes WK (1972) Interaction of signal and background variables in visual processing. Percept Psychophys 12:278–286
Estes WK, Allmeyer DH, Reder SM (1976) Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations. Percept Psychophys 19:1–15
Fox J (1975) The use of structural diagnostics in recognition. Hum Percept Perform 104:57–67
Garner WR (1974) The processing of information and structure. Erlbaum, Potomac, Md
Garner WR (1978) Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli. Exp Psychol Gen 107:287–308
Gibson EJ (1969) Principles of perceptual learning and development. Appleton, New York
Ginsburg A (1976) The perception of visual form: A two-dimensional filter analysis. In: Glezer VD (ed) Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Sensory System Physiology. Russ Acad Sci, Leningrad
Goldmeier E (1972) Similarity in visually perceived forms. Psychol Issues 8 (Whole No 29)
Hartline HK, Ratliff F (1957) Inhibitory interaction of receptor units in the eye of limulus. 40:357–376
Hilz R (Cavonius CR (1974) Functional organization of the peripheral retina: Sensitivity to periodic stimuli. Vis Res 14:1333–1337
Hochberg J (1970) Attention, organization, and consciousness. In Mostofsky DI (ed) Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Hoffman JE (1975) Hierarchial stages in the processing of visual information. Percept and Psychophys 18:348–354
Hoffman JE (1980) Interaction between global and local levels of a form. Psychol Hum Percept Perform 6:222–234
James W (1980) The principles of psychology. Dover, New York
Kahneman D, Henik A (in press) Perceptual organization and attention. In Kubovy M, Pomerantz JR (eds) Perceptual organization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Keren G, O'Hara WP, Skelton JM (1977) Levels of noise processing and attentional control. Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 3:653–664
Kinchla RA, Wolfe JM (1979) The order of visual processing: ‘Top-down,’ ‘bottom-up,’ or ‘middle-out.’ Percept Psychophys 25:225–231
Lindsay PH, Norman DA (1972) Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. Academic Press, New York
Miller J (in press) Global precedence in attention and decision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perfor
Martin M (1979) Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Mem Cognit 7:476–484
Navon D (1976) Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion. J Exp Psychol Percept 2:130–138
Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognit Psychol 9:353–383
Navon D, Gopher D (1979) On the economy of the human processing system. Psychol Rev 86:214–255
Neisser U (1967) Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Neisser U (1976) Cognition and reality. Freeman, San Francisco
Norman DA, Bobrow DG (1976) On the role of active memory processes in perception and cognition. In: Cofer CN (ed) The structure of human memory. Freeman, San Francisco
Palmer SE (1975) Visual perception and world knowledge: Notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction. In: Norman DA, Rumelhart DE, the LNR Research Group (eds) Explorations in cognition. Freeman, San Francisco
Petersik JT (1978) Possible role of transient and sustained visual mechanisms in the determination of similarity judgments. Percept Motor Skills 47:683–698
Pomerantz JR (in press) Perceptual organization in information processing. In: Kubovy M, Pomerantz JR (eds) Perceptual organization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Pomerantz JR, Sager LC (1975) Asymmetric integrality with dimensions of visual pattern. Percept Psychophys 18:460–466
Pomerantz JR, Schwaitzberg SD (1975) Grouping by proximity: Selective attention measures. Percept Psychophys 18:355–361
Pollatsek A, Digman L (1977) Dependent spatial channels in visual processing. Cognit Psychol 9:326–352
Prinzmetal W, Banks WP (1977) Good continuation affects visual detection. Percept Psychophys 21:389–395
Purcell DG, Stanovich KE, Spector A (1978) Visual angle and the word superiority effect. Mem Cognit 6:3–8
Rayner K (1977) Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes. Mem Cognit 5:443–448
Regan JE (1981) Automaticity and learning: The effect of familiarity on naming letters. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7:180–195
Rumelhart DE (1977) Toward an interactive model of reading. In: Dornic S (ed) Attention and performance VI. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Rumelhart DE, Siple P (1974) Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. Psychology Rev 81:99–118
Selfridge OG (1959) Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. In: Symposium on the mechanisation of thought processes. HM Stationery Office, London
Schultz DW, Eriksen CW (1977) Do noise masks terminate target processing? Mem Cognit 5:90–96
Schultz DW, Eriksen CW (1978) Stimulus size and acuity in information processing. Bull Psychonom Soc 12:397–399
Stirling N, Coltheart M (1977) Stroop interference in a letter naming task. Bull Psychonom Soc 10:31–34
Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643–662
Townsend JT, Taylor SG, Brown DR (1971) Lateral masking for letters with unlimited viewing time. Percept Psychophys 10:375–378
Vassilev A, Mitov D (1976) Perception time and spatial frequency. Vis Res 16:89–92
Wolford G, Hillingsworth S (1974) Lateral masking in visual information processing, Percept Psychophys 16:315–320
Yarbus AL (1967) Eye movements and vision. Plenum, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Navon, D. The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychol. Res 43, 1–32 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309635
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309635