Skip to main content
Log in

Choice between finger movements of different and identical form: The effect of relative signal frequency

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Binary choice reaction time depends on the relationship between the alternative responses. In particular, it is longer when choice is between finger movements of either hand, which have different forms, than when choice is between movements of identical form. This effect can be interpreted in terms of conjunctive preparation. If everything common to both responses is prepared in advance of the response signal, the form of the movement can only be prepared if it is the same for both responses. An alternative interpretation is in terms of single preparation. Under this hypothesis either one or the other response is prepared completely, but in case the not prepared response is demanded by the signal the time needed to shift should be longer if the movements are of different form. Thus, an effect of the form-relation will be seen only in unprepared responses, while under the hypothesis of conjunctive preparation it should be present in prepared responses as well. To decide between both hypotheses relative signal frequency and thus the proportion of expected (and prepared) responses was varied in three experiments. It turned out that the effect of the form-relation is larger with low relative signal frequency than with high frequency. This indicates the existence of single preparation. However, single preparation appears to be incomplete. When the obtained data are extrapolated to a relative signal frequency of 1.0 an effect of the form-relation still remains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertelson P, Barzeele J (1965) Interaction of time uncertainty and relative signal frequency in determining choice reaction time. J Exp Psychol 70:448–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunia CHM (1980) Motor preparation, recorded on the cortical and spinal level. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in Motor Behavior. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM, Peterson JR, Wolpe G (1963) Cognitive aspects of information processing: II. Adjustments to stimulus redundancy. J Exp Psychol 65:423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer H (1982a) Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence. Acta Psychol 50:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer H (1982b) Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence: Further evidence. Acta Psychol 50:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer H (1983) Reaktionszeit und Genauigkeit bei der Wahl zwischen formgleichen und formverschiedenen Bewegungen beider Hände. (in preparation)

  • Hinrichs JV (1970) Probability and expectancy in two-choice reaction time. Psychonom Sci 21:227–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs JV, Krainz PL (1970) Expectancy in choice reaction time: Stimulus vs. response anticipation? J Exp Psychol 85:330–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG, Stuart A (1963) The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Vol. 1: Distribution Theory. Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr B (1978) Task factors that influence selection and preparation for voluntary movements. In: Stelmach GE (ed) Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp ST, Greim DM (1979) Programmed control of aimed movements revisited: The role of target visibility and symmetry. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept] 5:509–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum S (1965) Response competition and/or inhibition in two-choice reaction time. Psychonom Sci 2:55–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge D, Tweedy JR (1964) Presentation probability and choice time. J Exp Psychol 68:477–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL (1980) Information processing in movement organization and execution. In: Nickerson RS (ed) Attention and Performance VIII. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Requin J (1969) Some data on neurophysiological processes involved in the preparatory motor activity to reaction time performance. In: Koster WG (ed) Attention and Performance II. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Requin J (1980) Towards a psychobiology of preparation for action. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in Motor Behavior. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA (1980) Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. J Exp Psychol 109:444–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Kornblum S (1982) A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychol 51:223–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg S, Monsell S, Knoll RL, Wright CE (1978) The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: comparisons of speech and typewriting. In: Stelmach GE (ed) Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grants No. He 1187/1 and 1187/2-1)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heuer, H. Choice between finger movements of different and identical form: The effect of relative signal frequency. Psychol. Res 44, 323–342 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309328

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309328

Keywords

Navigation