Skip to main content
Log in

Intermanual interactions during programming of aimed movements: Converging evidence on common and specific parameters of control

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Reaction time for choice between left-hand and right-hand responses sometimes depends on whether the responses assigned to the two hands are the same or different, but sometimes it does not. It has been suggested that the result obtained indicates whether the variable on which the responses differ is determined by common or specific parameters of control. Common parameters apply to movements of both hands, but specific parameters can be set independently for left-hand and right-hand responses. The interpretation of choice RT in terms of intermanual interactions requires that the conclusions converge with conclusions that are based on studies of simultaneous movements, provided that interactions can indeed be attributed to common parameters. Results from the latter type of experiment suggest that duration of aimed movements is determined by common parameters, but amplitude is determined by specific parameters. In two experiments it is shown that the choice-task results are consistent with this conclusion: Choice RT increases when the choice is between aimed movements that differ in duration, but not if the choice is between movements of different amplitudes. Further, an assimilation of responses is found in the former case but not in the latter. These findings are taken as further support for the notion of intermanual interactions during motor programming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annett, M., & Annett, J. (1979). Individual differences in right and left reaction time. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcos, D.A. (1984). Two-handed movement control. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55, 117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunkel, M. (1962). Über relative Koordination bei willkürlichen menschlichen Gliederbewegungen. Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie, 275, 472–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1981). Fast aiming movements with the left and right hand: Evidence for two-process theories of motor control. Psychological Research, 43, 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1982a). Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence. Acta Psychologica, 50, 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1982b). Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence: Further evidence. Acta Psychologica, 50, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1982c). Choice between finger movements of different and identical form: The effect of relative signal frequency. Psychological Research, 44, 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1983). Reaktionszeit und Genauigkeit bei der Wahl zwischen formgleichen und formverschiedenen Bewegungen beider Hände. Psychologische Beiträge, 25, 532–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1984a). Bewegungen mit der rechten und linken Hand: Interferenzen bei der Programmierung. Psychologische Beiträge. 26, 561–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1984b). Binary choice reaction time as a function of the relationship between durations and forms of responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 392–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1984c). On re-scaleability of force and time in aiming movements. Psychological Research, 46, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1985). Intermanual interactions during simultaneous execution and programming of finger movements. Journal of Motor Behavior. 17, 335–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (in press). Intermanual interactions during programming of finger movements: Transient effects of “homologous coupling”. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.) Generation and Modulation of Action Patterns. Berlin: Springer.

  • Keele, S.W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S.W. (1981). Behavioral analysis of movement. In V.B. Brooks (Ed.) Handbook of Physiology. Section 1: The Nervous System. Vol. II Motor Control. Bethesda, Maryland: American Physiological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J.A.S., Putnam, C.A., & Goodman, D. (1983). On the spacetime structure of human interlimb co-ordination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 347–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J.A.S., Southard, D.L., & Goodman, D. (1979a). On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science, 203, 1029–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J.A.S., Southard, D.L., & Goodman, D. (1979b). On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S.T. (1977). Reaction time analysis of programmed control. In R. Hutton (Ed.) Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, Vol. V. Santa Barbara: Journal Publishing Affiliates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S.T. (1979). Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 7, 375–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S.T., & Greim, D.M. (1979). Programmed control of aimed movements revisited: The role of target visibility and symmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 509–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D.G., & Soderberg, G.A. (1971). Homologous intrusions: An analogue of linguistic blends. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 32, 645–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk, R.G., & MacKenzie, C.L. (1980a). Information processing in movement organization and execution. In R.S. Nickerson (Ed.) Attention and Performance VIII. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk, R.G., & MacKenzie, C.L. (1980b). A preliminary theory of two-hand co-ordinated control. In G.E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.) Tutorials in Motor Behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk, R.G., MacKenzie, C.L., & Baba, D.M. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 335–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D.E., Smith, J.E.K., & Wright, C.E. (1982). Models for the speed and accuracy of aimed movements. Psychological Review, 89, 449–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness. The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. (1981). Attentional asymmetries during concurrent bimanual performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preilowski, B. (1975). Bilateral motor interaction: Perceptual-motor performance of partial and complete “split-brain” patients. In K.J. Zülch, O. Creutzfeldt, & G.G. Galbraith (Eds.) Cerebral Localization, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, applications, extensions. In R.A. Magill (Ed.) Memory and Control of Action. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A. (1985). Motor programming. In H. Heuer, U. Kleinbeck, & K.-H. Schmidt (Eds.) Motor Behavior: Programming, Control, and Acquisition. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A., & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motorresponses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R.A. (1980). On the theoretical status of time in motor program representation. In G.E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.) Tutorials in Motor Behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R.A. (1984). The search for invariance in skilled movement behavior. Report No. 11, Research Group on Perception & Action at ZiF, Bielefeld.

  • Schmidt, R.A., Zelaznik, H.N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J.S., & Quinn, J.T. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtke, H. (1960). Über die Struktur willkürlicher Bewegungen. Psychologische Beiträge, 5, 428–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, M.R. (1979). A reappraisal of Fitts' law. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heuer, H. Intermanual interactions during programming of aimed movements: Converging evidence on common and specific parameters of control. Psychol. Res 48, 37–46 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309277

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309277

Keywords

Navigation