Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between variability of intertap intervals and interval duration

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Subjects tracked intervals in a synchronization paradigm at interval durations of 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, and 1,000 ms. The variability of intertap intervals (ITIs) shows a sudden increase near 300 ms. This increase is interpreted as indicating the transition from automatic to controlled movement. It is suggested that the sudden change in the variability of ITIs does not reflect the operation of different timing mechanisms at short and long intervals, but differences in the way in which attentional processes come to bear on movement initiation for different interval durations. In contrast to previous findings reported in the literature, a U-shaped function between interval duration and variability in the 300-to-1,000-ms range was not observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartlett, N. R., & Bartlett, S. C. (1959). Synchronization of a motor response with an anticipated sensory event. Psychological Review, 66, 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creelman, C. D. (1962). Human discrimination of auditory duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 582–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M. (1979). Group selection and phasic reentrant signaling: a theory of higher brain function. In G. M. Edelman & V. B. Mountcastle, The mindful brain (pp. 51–100). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1982). Rhythm and Tempo. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 149–180). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P., & Voillaume, C. (1971). Les répères du sujet dans la synchronization et dans la pseudo-synchronization. Année Psychologique, 71, 359–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1981). Time-series analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hary, D., & Moore, G. P. (1985). Temporal tracking and synchronization strategies. Human Neurobiology, 4, 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hary, D., & Moore, G. P. (1987). Synchronizing human movement with an external clock source. Biological Cybernetics, 56, 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristofferson, A. B. (1976). Low-variance stimulus-response latencies: deterministic internal delays? Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, J. (1967). Timing in temporal tracking. Soesterberg, Netherlands: Institute for Perception RVO-TNO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöppel, E., & Logothetis, N. (1986). Neural oscillations in the human brain. Naturwissenschaften, 73, 267–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, L. T. (1886). On the time sense. Mind, 11, 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: implications for a model of the internal clock. Psychological Monographs, 77, issue 576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. (1971). The influence of the tempo of playing on the rhythmic structure studied at pianist's playing scales. In J. Vredenbregt & J. Wartenweiler (Eds.), Medicine and Sport, V. 6, Biomechanics II (pp. 129–132). Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, A. M. (1982). Timing and coordination of repetitive bimanual movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, A. M., & Kristofferson, A. B. (1973a). The timing of interresponse intervals. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 455–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, A. M., & Kristofferson, A. B. (1973b). Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, H. (1932). The effects of rate of sequence upon the accuracy of synchronization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 357–379.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peters, M. The relationship between variability of intertap intervals and interval duration. Psychol Res 51, 38–42 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309274

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309274

Keywords

Navigation