Skip to main content
Log in

Recall of enacted and nonenacted instructions compared: forgetting functions

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Three experiments are reported in which under one condition subjects were given instructions to perform a series of acts (SPTs) and to remember the acts performed, and under a second condition were asked to remember the same verbal instructions without being required to perform any acts. Different groups of subjects were tested at different retention intervals. The forgetting curves for the two conditions differ with respect to intercept, but are similar in slope. The similarity in slope for the two conditions is present irrespective of differences in intercept. Several methodological issues are discussed as well as the nature of the relationship between recall of SPTs and verbal instructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1985). Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance. Experimental Aging Research, 11, 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables in the free recall of words and action events. Memory & Cognition, 11, 573–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1985). On the generality of the laws of memory. In L.-G. Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.), Perspectives on learning and memory, pp. 247–277. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory. German Journal of Psychology, 9, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, G. R. (1978). On interpretation of interactions. Memory & Cognition, 6, 312–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Vining, S. K. (1978). Effect of semantic versus structural processing on long-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 198–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L.-G., & Cohen, R. L. (1988). Enrichment and generation in the recall of enacted and non-enacted instructions. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: current research and issues, pp. 427–432. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz, E., & Donnenwerth-Nolan, S. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences: A selective interference test. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 322–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slamecka, N. J. (1988). Personal communication, Toronto, July 25.

  • Slamecka, N. J., & McElree, B. (1983). Normal forgetting of verbal lists as a function of their degree of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 384–397.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nilsson, LG., Cohen, R.L. & Nyberg, L. Recall of enacted and nonenacted instructions compared: forgetting functions. Psychol. Res 51, 188–193 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309147

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309147

Keywords

Navigation