Skip to main content
Log in

Using housing items to indicate socioeconomic status: Latin America

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This note explores the possibility of using physical housing quality information from censuses to help indicate socioeconomic status, particularly that of children, elderly people and women in developing areas such as Latin America. We develop a comparative scale from six housing items (wall material, floor material, roof material, availability of electricity, type of sewerage and water facilities) since these items are recommended by the U.N., tend to be present in most housing censuses, tend to be highly related to each other and tend to have a similar valuation. A more basic three-item scale, consisting of the last three items listed above, is also discussed because this scale might be even more widely available while providing valuable, aggregated, information. The six-item and three-item scales correlate highly with each other. There is a wide range among Latin American countries in people's distribution along the scales but the scales themselves seem applicable everywhere. Not only have they been proving useful in our own research, but both scales correlate fairly well with a country's infant mortality rate on the aggregate level and with an individual's educational attainment among men and women 15 to 59 and among elderly people 60 years of age and older.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arias, E.: 1994, ‘Change in the prevalence of female headed households: The cases of Chile and Paraguay (1970–1980)’, Master's Thesis, The Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Baer, W. C.: 1976, ‘The evolution of housing indicators and housing standards’, Public Policy 24, pp. 361–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. and R. Zeller: 1979, Reliability and Validity Assessment (SAGE, Newbury Park, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vellis, R. F.: 1991, Scale Development (SAGE, Newbury Park, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, S., A. Palloni, E. Arias and H. Rafalimanana: 1995, ‘Demographics and change, stability, and patterns in Latin American households’, Paper presented at the Population Association of America meetings in San Francisco.

  • Duncan, O. D.: 1961, ‘A socioeconomic index for all occupations’, in A. J. Reiss Jr., Occupations and Social Status (The Free Press of Glencoe, Inc. New York), pp. 109–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzeboom, H. B., P. M.De Graaf, D. J. Treiman with an appendix by J. De Leeuw: 1992, ‘A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status’, Social Science Research 21, pp. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedert, J. E. and J. L. Goodman, Jr.: 1977, Indicators of the Quality of U.S. Housing (An Urban Institute Paper on Housing).

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. and K. Hope: 1974, The Social Grading of Occupations (Clarendon, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. L.Jr.: 1978, ‘Causes and indicators of housing quality’, Social Indicators Research 5, 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koebel, C. T.: 1986, ‘Estimating substandard housing for planning purposes’, Journal of Planning — Education & Research 5, pp. 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matras, J.: 1984, Social Inequality, Stratification and Mobility (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, C. B. and M. G. Powers: 1983, The Socioeconomic Approach to Status Measurement With a GUIDE To Occupational and Socioeconomic Status Scores (Cap and Gown Press, Houston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C.: 1978, Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York) (from Carmines and Zeller, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J.Jr.: 1961a, Occupations and Social Status (The Free Press of Glencoe, Inc., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J.Jr.: 1961b, ‘Social correlates of occupational prestige status’, in Occupations and Social Status (The Free Press of Glencoe, Inc., New York), pp. 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, D. J.: 1977, Occupation Prestige in Comparative Perspective (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1984a, Compiling Social Indicators on the Situation of Women, Studies in Methods Series F no.32 (United Nations, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1984b, Improving Concepts and Methods for Statistics and Indicators on the Situation of Women, Studies in Methods Series F no. 33 (United Nations, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1988, Improving Statistics and Indicators on Women Using Household Surveys, Studies in Methods Series F no. 48 (United Nations, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1989, Handbook of Social Indicators, Studies in Methods Series F no. 49 (United Nations, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arias, E., De Vos, S. Using housing items to indicate socioeconomic status: Latin America. Soc Indic Res 38, 53–80 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293786

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293786

Keywords

Navigation