Abstract
Interactions of 16 adults (eight married couples whose youngest child was less than 2 1/2 years old) with a single actor infant, dressed as either a male or a female, were recorded and analyzed in four categories: direction of gaze, facial expression, physical contact with the infant, and toy used. After the interaction period, a 45-minute interview on child rearing was conducted with each member of the couple. Observed interactions were then compared with interview data. The results support previous studies which show that both male and female parents behave differently toward unfamiliar infants on the basis of perceived sex. However, parents, especially mothers, appeared unaware of their differential treatment of male and female infants. These results suggest subtle sex-typing of infants by adults.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Frisch, H. L. Sex stereotypes in adult-infant play. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1671–1675.
Seavey, C. A., Katz, P. A., & Zalk, S. R. Baby X: The effects of gender labels on adult responses to infants. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 103–109.
Smith, C., & Lloyd, B. Maternal behavior and perceived sex of infant: Revisited. Child Development, 1978, 49, 1263–1265.
Will, J. A., Self, P. A., & Datan, N. Maternal behavior and perceived sex of infant. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1976, 46, 135–139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to thank Judith West and Marian Bouwmeester for their assistance in coding the videotapes. This research was supported by a Biomedical Research Support Grant to Colorado State University by the National Institutes of Health (5507RR07127-08). A version of this article was presented as a paper at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, San Francisco, March 1979.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Culp, R.E., Cook, A.S. & Housley, P.C. A comparison of observed and reported adult-infant interactions: Effects of perceived sex. Sex Roles 9, 475–479 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289787
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289787