Skip to main content
Log in

Traditional gender role beliefs and individual outcomes: An exploratory analysis

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of a survey administered to 806 undergraduate students serve as the basis for analyzing the relationships among traditional gender roles, same-sex intimacy, and homophobia. High levels of homophobia and low levels of intimacy were found among those who believe strongly in the traditional roles. Previous research has shown both homophobia and a lack of intimacy to be harmful to individuals and for society. The present findings may, therefore, constitute empirical evidence of the negative effects of gender roles. Sex differences found in the survey results also support this contention. A general model of the consequences of traditional gender role beliefs for those who hold these views is also speculated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, M. (1988). Thinking about women: Sociological perspectives on sex and gender (2nd ed.). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., & Hess, E. (1974). Cross-sex friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M. & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Sex Differences in Same-Sex Friendship. Sex Roles, 8, 721–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, W. (1967). Homosexual behavior among males. New York: Hawthorn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, D. G., Abernethy, V., & Oliver, W. R. (1984). Correlations between female sex roles and attitudes toward male sexual dysfunctions in thirty women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 10, 160–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L. R. (1981). Pressure and pretense: Living with gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 7, 331–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. S. (1973). Intimate relations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. L., & Narus, L. R., Jr. (1981). Sex roles and intimacy in same sex and other sex relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 444–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunebaum, H. (1976). Thoughts on sex, love, and commitment. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 2, 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W. (1973). Dogmatism and opinions about mental illness. Psychological Reports, 32, 1283–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larwood, L., & Wood, M. M. (1977). Women in management. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. A. (1978). Emotional Intimacy Among Men. Journal of Social Issues, 34, 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumby, M. E. (1976). Homophobia: The quest for a valid scale. Journal of Homosexuality, 2, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. P., Jr. (1970). A revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 26, 791–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. P., Jr. (1974). Identification and measurement of multidimensional attitudes toward equality between the sexes. Journal of Homosexuality, 1, 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. P., Jr., & Games, R. G. (1974). Some characteristics of those who hold positive and negative attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 1, 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, M. E. (1985). The McGill report on male intimacy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millham, J., & Weinberger, L. E. (1977). Sexual preference, sex role appropriateness, and restriction of social access. Journal of Homosexuality, 2, 343–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millham, J., San Miguel, C. L., & Kellogg, R. (1976). A factor-analytic conceptualization of attitudes toward male and female homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 2, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, S. F., & Garfinkle, E. M. (1978). Male homophobia, Journal of Social Issues, 34, 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlofsky, J. L., Marcia, J. E., & Lesser, I. M. (1973). Ego identity status and intimacy versus isolation crisis of young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. B. (1985). Just friends: The role of friendship in our lives. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z. (1980). Children's friendships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. T. (1971). Homophobia: A tentative personality profile. Psychological Reports, 29, 1091–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., & Steffensmeier, R. (1974). Sex differences in reactions to homosexuals: Research continuities and further developments. The Journal of Sex Research, 10, 52–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, S. (1989). Covert intimacy in men's friendships. In B. Risman & P. Schwartz (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., Jr., Grisanti, C., & Pleck, J. H. (1985). Attitudes toward the male role and their correlates. Sex Roles, 13, 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., Jr., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, L. E., & Millham, J. (1979). Attitudinal homophobia and support of traditional sex roles. Journal of Homosexuality, 4, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, L. (1979). Sex role socialization: A focus on women. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. G. (1985). Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 12, 587–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H. (1982). Men's friendships, women's friendships, and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author would like to thank Laura O'Toole, Gerry Turkel, Cynthia Robbins, and Donald Unger for their encouragement and assistance in every aspect of this project. The financial support for the Undergraduate Research Program of the University of Delaware has also been greatly appreciated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stark, L.P. Traditional gender role beliefs and individual outcomes: An exploratory analysis. Sex Roles 24, 639–650 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288419

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288419

Keywords

Navigation