Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudes and expectations about children with nontraditional and traditional gender roles

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cross-sex behavior in boys generally is viewed more negatively than cross-sex behavior in girls. The two goals of this study were to assess attitudes toward tomboys and sissies, and to explore possible causes for differential evaluations of tomboys and sissies. Eighty undergraduates completed questionnaires assessing their attitudes toward tomboys and sissies, and their expectations for the future adult behavior of typical boys, typical girls, tomboys, and sissies. Results revealed that sissies were more negatively evaluated than tomboys. Women were more accepting of, and perceived more societal acceptance for cross-sex children, than were men. One reason for the negative evaluation of sissies may be that there is more concern for their future outcomes than for tomboys. Analyses of predictions concerning future behavior showed that sissies, more so than tomboys, were expected to continue to show cross-gender behavior into adulthood. Also, sissies were rated as likely to be less well adjusted and more likely to be homosexual when they grow up than other children. The accuracy of these beliefs and their implications for child-rearing practices are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthill, J. K. (1987). Parents' beliefs and values about sex roles, sex differences, and sexuality: Their sources and implications. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Sex and Gender, Vol. 7, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D., & DelBoca, F. K. (1981). Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J., & Endsley, R. C. (1976). Influence of sex of child and parent on parental reactions to hypothetical parent-child situations. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 94, 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith, S. K. (1981). Sexual preference: Its development in men and women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbard, M. R., Martin, C. L., Endsley, R. C., & Halverson, C. F. (1986). Influence of sex stereotypes on children's exploration and memory: A competence versus performance distinction. Developmental Psychology, 22, 481–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. B., & McCloskey, L. A. (1984). Peers and the maintenance of sex-typed behavior: The development of children's conceptions of cross-gender behavior in their peers. Social Cognition, 2, 294–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (1979). The social world of the child. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagot, B. I. (1977). Consequences of moderate cross-gender behavior in preschool children. Child Development, 48, 902–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, S. (1974). Approval of cross-sex-role behavior. Psychological Reports, 35, 643–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, S. (1981). Why is cross-sex-role behavior more approved for girls than for boys? A status characteristic approach. Sex Roles, 7, 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. A. (1981). Toward mental health: The benefits of psychological androgyny. Professional Psychology, 12, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. (1975). Children called “sissy” and “tomboy,” adolescents who cross-dress and adults who wants to change sex. In R. Green (Ed.), Human sexuality: A health practitioner's text. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. (1987). The “Sissy boy syndrome” and the development of homosexuality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grellert, E. A., Newcomb, M. D. & Bentler, P. M. (1982). Childhood play activities of male and female homosexuals and heterosexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 11, 451–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, W. M., & Andreasen, N. C. (1982). Simultaneous tests of many hypotheses in exploratory research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 170, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W. W. (1983). Peer relations. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & E. M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmer, J. D., & Kleiber, D. A. (1981). Tomboys and sissies: Androgynous children? Sex Roles, 7, 1205–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. G. (1976). Androgyny as a model of mental health for women: From theory to therapy. In A. G. Kaplan & J. P. Bean (Eds.), Beyond sex-role stereotypes: Readings toward a psychology of androgyny. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeory, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. E., & Roopnarine, J. (1979). Peer influences on sex-role development in preschoolers. Child Development, 50, 1219–1222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. E., Esterbrooks, M. A., & Holden, G. W. (1980). Reinforcement and punishment among preschoolers: Characteristics, effects, and correlates. Child Development, 51, 1230–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., & Downs, A. C. (1980). Mothers, fathers, and peers as socialization agents of sex-typed play behavior in young children. Child Development, 51, 1237–1247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L. (1987). A ratio measure of sex stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 489–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, C., & Stitt, C. L. (1978). An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 929–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Martin, C. L. (1988). Functional flexibility: A new conception of interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 88–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumb, P., & Cowan, G. (1984). A developmental study of destereotyping and androgynous activity preferences of tomboys, nontomboys, and males. Sex Roles, 10, 703–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghir, M. T., & Robins, E. (1973). Male and female homosexuality. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, K. J., Finegan, J. K., Doering, R. W., & Bradley, S. J. (1984). Two subgroups of gender-problem children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by a Humanities and Social Sciences grant from the University of British Columbia. Portions of this work were presented as the meetings of the National Council of Family Relations, Philadelphia, November 1988. I appreciate Richard Fabes' comments on an earlier draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, C.L. Attitudes and expectations about children with nontraditional and traditional gender roles. Sex Roles 22, 151–166 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288188

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288188

Keywords

Navigation