Abstract
In order to examine the possibility that the attribution of more aggression to boys may be in part a function of observer bias, 40 adults were asked in Study 1 to record the degree of aggression in a series of line drawings that showed children interacting. It was found that a significant subset of both males and females recorded more aggression for boys than for girls when they scanned scenes that showed numerous children interacting. When they rated a series of drawings of two children interacting, males rated boys as significantly more aggressive than girls. Study 2 examined 48 adults' responses under one of three instruction conditions. The findings of Study 1 were replicated. Additionally, it was found that some forms of instruction eliminate sex-typed biases while others yield significant biases among both male and female untrained observers. These results are interpreted in light of the literature on schematic processing. Implications pertaining to the socialization of aggression and to research on sex differences in aggression are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 1981, 88, 354–364.
Cann, A., & Newbern, S. R. Sex stereotype effects in children's picture recognition. Child Development, 1984, 55, 1085–1090.
Caplan, P. J. Beyond the box score: A boundary condition for sex differences in aggression and achievement striving. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
Condry, J., & Condry, S. Sex differences: A study in the eye of the beholder. Child Development, 1976, 47, 812–819.
Condry, S. M., Condry, J. C., Jr., & Pogatshnik, L. W. Sex differences: A study of the ear of the beholder. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 697–704.
Cohen, C. E. Person categories and social perception: Testing some boundaries of the processing effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 40, 441–452.
Culp, R. E., Cook, A. S., & Housley, P. C. A comparison of observed and reported adult-infant interactions: Effects of perceived sex. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 475–479.
Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 1980, 35, 867–881.
DiPietro, J. A. Rough and tumble play: A function of gender. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 50–58.
Durrett, M. E. The relationship of early infant regulation and later behavior in play interviews. Child Development, 1959, 30, 211–216.
Eme, R. F. Sex differences in childhood psychopathology: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 574–595.
Fagot, B. I. The influence of sex of child on parental reactions to toddler children. Child Development, 1978, 49, 459–465.
Fagot, B. I., & Hagan, R. Aggression in toddlers' responses to the assertive acts of boys and girls. Sex Roles, in press.
Hatfield, J. S., Ferguson, L. R., & Alpert, R. Mother-child interaction and the socialization process. Child Development, 1967, 38, 365–414.
Horn, W. F., & Haynes, S. N. An investigation of sex bias in behavioral observations and ratings. Behavioral Assessment, 1981, 3, 173–183.
Kent, R. N., O'Leary, K. D., Diament, C., & Dietz, A. Expectation biases in observational evaluation of therapeutic change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 774–780.
Levin, H., & Sears, R. R. Identification with parents as a determinant of doll play aggression. Child Development, 1956, 27, 135–153.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1974.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. Sex differences and aggression: A rejoinder and reprise. Child Development, 1980, 51, 964–980.
Martin, M. F., Gelfand, D. M., & Hartmann, D. P. Effects of adult and peer observers on boys' and girls' responses to an aggressive model. Child Development, 1971, 42, 1271–1275.
Meyer, J. W., & Sobieszek, B. I. Effects of a child's sex on adult interpretations of its behavior. Developmental Psychology, 1972, 6, 42–48.
Romanczyk, R. G., Kent, R. N., Diament, C., & O'Leary, K. D. Measuring the reliability of observational data: A reactive process. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973, 6, 175–184.
Rosenthal, R. Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
Rosenthal, R. Interpersonal expectations: Effects of the experimenter's hypothesis. In R. Rosenthal & R. L. Rosnow (Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
Rubin, J. Z., Provenzano, F. J., & Luria, Z. The eye of the beholder: Parents' view on sex of newborns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1974, 44, 512–519.
Sears, P. S. Doll play aggression in normal young children: Influence of sex, age, sibling status, father's absence. Psychological Monographs, 1951, 65, 6.
Seavey, C. A., Katz, R. A., & Zalk, S. R. Baby X: The effect of gender labels on adult responses to infants. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 103–110.
Serbin, L. A., O'Leary, K. D., Kent, R. N., & Tonick, I. J. A comparison of teacher response to the preacademic and problem behavior of boys and girls. Child Development, 1973, 44, 796–804.
Shuller, D. Y., & McNamara, J. R. Expectancy factors in behavioral observations. Behavior Therapy, 1976, 7, 519–527.
Sobieszek, B. I. Adult interpretations of child behavior. Sex Roles, 1978, 4, 579–588.
Tieger, T. (1980). On the biological basis of sex differences in aggression. Child Development, 1980, 51, 943–963.
Will, J., Self, P., & Datan, N. Maternal behavior and perceived sex of infant. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1976, 46, 135–139.
Zanna, M. P., & Pack, S. J. On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1975, 11, 583–591.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was partially supported by a grant from the FCAC of the Ministry of Education of Quebec. The authors would like to thank Marie-France Boudreault and Johanne White for assistance with data collection, and Jane Steward, Ph.D., and Marc Atkins, M.A., for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyons, J.A., Serbin, L.A. Observer bias in scoring boys' and girls' aggression. Sex Roles 14, 301–313 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287581
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287581