Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Same-sex imitation: The avoidance of cross-sex models or the acceptance of same-sex models?

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This experiment examined whether acceptance of same-sex behavior and rejection of opposite-sex behavior contribute equally to the same-sex imitation effect in both boys and girls. Third- and fourth-grade children observed four male and four female peer models display preferences toward a variety of objects. For each object, only four models were asked for their preferences. In this way, it was possible for the objects to become sex-linked depending on the sex composition of the group of models endorsing a particular item. Subsequently, children were presented with pairwise combinations of the more masculine, feminine, or neutral objects and asked their preference. Results indicated that although there is no difference between boys' and girls' acceptance of same-sex behavior, boys tend to reject opposite-sex behavior more than girls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borstlemann, L. J. Sex of experimenter and sex-typed behavior of young children. Child Development, 1961, 32, 519–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussey, K., & Perry, D. G. Sharing reinforcement contingencies with a model: A social-learning analysis of similarity effects in imitation research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 1168–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerich, W. Parental identification in young children. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1959, 60, 257–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, R. E. Sex-role pressures and socialization of the male child. Psychological Reports, 1959, 5, 457–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. M. Sex role learning in the nuclear family. Child Development, 1963, 34, 319–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford; Stanford University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. Sex-typing and socialization. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. G., & Bussey, K. The social learning theory of sex differences: Imitation is alive and well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1699–1712.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanford University, USA

    Kay Bussey

  2. Florida Atlantic University, USA

    David G. Perry

Authors
  1. Kay Bussey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David G. Perry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bussey, K., Perry, D.G. Same-sex imitation: The avoidance of cross-sex models or the acceptance of same-sex models?. Sex Roles 8, 773–784 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287572

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287572

Keywords

Search

Navigation