Skip to main content
Log in

A status theory of the evaluation of sex-role and age-role behavior

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An earlier investigation formulated a status theory of behavioral choice evaluation to explain the lesser approval for cross-sex-role behavior of males than of females. Since males are often assigned higher prestige, their deviation from male to female behavior represents a movement from higher to lower status, resulting in a loss of approval. To determine that the fit of previous data with the theory was indeed due to the status characteristic of sex roles, the current study used the theory to predict the evaluations of appropriate and cross-role behavior concerning age roles as well as sex roles. Furthermore, the effect of status upon evaluation was hypothesized to reside in the association of status with social value and, in turn, the effect of social value upon evaluation. Subjects were 57 male and 40 female university students who provided approval ratings of either appropriate or cross-age-role and sex-role behavior. For sex and age, cross-role behavior received less approval for the higher status actor. This indicated that the lesser approval of cross-sex-role behavior of males was due to the differential status ranking of male and female roles, rather than to some other feature more specific to sex roles. The proposition that social value is the explanatory link in the effect of status upon evaluation is supported by the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aries, P. Centuries of childhood. New York: Random House, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beere, C. A. Women and women's issues: A handbook of tests and measures. San Francisco: Bass, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. Sex typing and the avoidance of cross sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Cohn, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 1972, 37, 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Fisek, J., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., Rosenkrantz, P. S., & Vogel, S. R. Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 34, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. G. Masculinity-femininity development in children. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1957, 21, 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, V. L. Transvestites in the Middle Ages. American Journal of Sociology, 1974, 79, 1381–1394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.) New York: Harper & Row, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. Discriminative parental solicitude: A biological perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1980, 42, 277–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. The behavior of women and men. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etaugh, C., & Brown, B. Perceiving the causes of success and failure of male and female performers: A developmental study. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, S. Approval of cross-sex-role behavior. Psychological Reports, 1974, 35, 643–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, S. Why is cross-sex-role behavior more approved for girls than for boys? A status characteristic approach. Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fling, S., & Manosevitz, H. Sex typing in nursery school children's play interests. Developmental Psychology, 1972, 7, 146–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W. W., & Moore, S. G. Avoidance of inappropriate sex-typing by young children. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1963, 27, 467–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesselbart, S. Women doctors win and made nurses lose: A study of sex role and occupational stereotypes. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 1977, 4, 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansky, L. M. The family structure also affects the model: Sex-role attitudes in parents of preschool children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1967, 13, 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M. E., & Hall, K. P. Conceptualizing sex as a status characteristic: Applications to leadership training strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, (3), 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, D. B. A note on sex differences in the development of masculine and feminine identification. Psychological Review, 1959, 66, 126–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, B. F., & Wietzel-O'Neill, P. A. Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task oriented groups. American Sociological Review, 1977, 42, 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millman, M. She did it all for love: A feminist view of the sociology of deviance. In M. Millman & R. M. Kanter (Eds.), Another voice. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, H. K. Sex bias in the evaluation of professional achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, 66, 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newson, J., & Newson, E. Cultural aspects of childrearing in the English-speaking world. In M. P. M. Martin (Ed.), The integration of a child into a social world. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugarten, B. L., Moore, J. W., & Lowe, J. C. Age norms, age constraints, and adult socialization. American Journal of Sociology, 1965, 70, 710–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, I., & McKool, M., Jr. Social structure and status of the aged: Toward some valid cross-cultural generalizations. Aging and Human Development, 1972, 3, 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabban, M. Sex-role identification in young children in two diverse social groups. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1950, 42, 81–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, M. W., Johnson, M., & Foner, A. Age strata in the society. In M. W. Riley, M. Johnson, & A. Foner, Aging and society: Vol. 3: A sociology of age stratification. New York: Russel Sage, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkrantz, P. S., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. M., & Ross, S. A. Resistance by preschool boys to sex-inappropriate behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972, 63, 342–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R., & Allen, V. L. Role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, T. Senior esteem as a factor of socioeconomic complexity. Gerontologist, 1976, 16, 433–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. H., Pohly, S. R., & Mueller, E. The influence of masculine, feminine, and neutral tasks on children's achievement behavior, expectancies for success and attainment values. Child Development, 1971, 42, 195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feinman, S. A status theory of the evaluation of sex-role and age-role behavior. Sex Roles 10, 445–456 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287561

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287561

Keywords

Navigation