Abstract
A questionnaire study of 229 high-school students examined the relationship between sex role orientation and various dimensions of self-esteem. The results provide strong support for the masculinity model self-esteem, especially for females. Multivariate analyses of variance revealed the following: (a) females perceived themselves to be significantly more socially competent than males; (b) males perceived themselves to be more physically competent than females; (c) adolescents high on masculinity perceived themselves to be significantly more socially competent, physically competent, and to have higher general self-esteem than those low on masculinity; (d) males and females high on masculinity perceived themselves to be significantly more physically competent and to have higher general self-esteem than females low on masculinity, although males low on masculinity did not differ significantly from any of the other interaction groups. Regression analyses by gender revealed the following: (a) the contribution of masculinity to social competence was much greater for females than for males, (b) the contribution of masculinity to physical competence was much greater for females than for males, and (c) the contribution of masculinity to general self-esteem was much greater for females than for males. In summary, for males, gender may override the impact of sex role orientation, while among females the impact of sex role orientation may be accentuated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antill, J. L., & Cunningham, J. D. Self-esteem as a function of masculinity in both sexes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.
Bem, S. L. Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbum and Locksley-Colton critiques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1047–1054.
Coopersmith, S. The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco, Calif. Freeman, 1976.
Deutsch, C., & Gilbert, L. Sex role stereotypes: Effect on perceptions of self and others and on personal adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1976, 23, 373–379.
Douvan, E., & Adelson, J. The adolescent experience. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966.
Erikson, E. Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton, 1963.
Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Indvik, J. The instrumental and expressive domains of marital communication. Human Communication Research, 1982, 8, 195–213.
Flaherty, J. F., & Dusek, J. B. An investigation of the relationship between psychological androgyny and components of self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 984–992.
Guttentag, M., & Bray, H. Androgyny in the schools. In E. M. Hetherington & R. D. Parke (Eds.), Child psychology: A contemporary viewpoint (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
Harter, S. The Perceived Competence Scale for Children. Child Development, 1982, 53, 87–97.
Heilbrun, A. B. Gender differences in the functional link between androgyny, social cognition, and competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 41, 1106–1118.
Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Short form of the Texas Social Behavior Inventory (TBSI): An objective measure of self-esteem. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974, 4, 473–475.
Helmreich, R., Spence, J. T., & Holahan, C. K. Psychological androgyny and sex role flexibility: A test of two hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1631–1644.
Horner, M. S. Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 78, 147–176.
Jones, W., Chernovetz, O'C., & Hansson, R. R. The engima of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 298–313.
Kagan, J. Acquisition and significance of sex-typing and sex role identity. In M. L. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1964.
Kelly, J. A., & Worell, J. New formulations of sex roles and androgyny: A critical review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 1101–1115.
Kohlberg, L. A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex role concepts an dattitudes. In E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1966.
Kohlberg, L., & Zigler, E. The impact of cognitive maturity on the development of sex role attitudes in the years four to eight. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1967, 75, 89–103.
Lamke, L. K. The impact of sex role orientation of self-esteem in early adolescence. Child Development, 1982, 53, 1530–1535.
Lansky, L. M. The family structure also affects the model: Sex role attitudes in parents of preschool children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1967, 13, 139–150.
Lerner, R., Sorell, G., & Brachkey, B. Sex differences in self-concept and self-esteem in late adolescents: A time lag analysis. Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 707–722.
Mussen, P. H. Early sex role development. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago, Ill.: Rand-McNally, 1969.
Pleck, J. H. Masculinity-femininity: Current and alternative paradigms. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 161–177.
Rosenberg, M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1965.
Silvern, L. E., & Ryan, L. W. Self-rate adjustment and sex-typing in the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Is masculinity the primary predictor of adjustment? Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 739–763.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. Masculinity and femininity. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press, 1978.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and concepts of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.
Stake, J. E., & Orlofsky, J. L. On the use of global and specific measures in assessing the self-esteem of males and females. Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 653–662.
Tavris, C. Men and women report their views on masculinity. Psychology Today, 1977, 82, 34–42.
Urberg, K. A. Sex role conceptualizations in adolescents and adults. Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15, 90–92.
Van Tuinen, M., & Ramanaiah, N. V. A multimethod analysis of selected self-esteem measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 1979, 13, 16–24.
Weiss, P. Some aspects of femininity. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1962, 23, 1038A.
Wells, K. Gender-role identity and psychological adjustment in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1980, 9, 59–73.
Whitley, B. E., Jr. Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 765–778.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported through the Agricultural Experiment Station at Oregon State University as part of Project W-144, Social Competencies in Children. The authors would also like to express gratitude to Dr. Leanne Lamke and Dr. Alexis Walker for their thoughtful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Both authors contributed equally to the research and preparation of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cate, R., Sugawara, A.I. Sex role orientation and dimensions of self-esteem among middle adolescents. Sex Roles 15, 145–158 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287480
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287480