Abstract
Findings from an analysis of the reading performances of three reading-disabled children provide a tentative answer to the controversial issue whether reading-disabled children have a language comprehension deficit or not. Of the three reading-disabled children studied, two were poor in language comprehension but had much better word-reading skill.Footnote 1 The third disabled reader had superior listening comprehension but was poor in word-reading skill. The two good word-readers appear to use two different strategies, viz., grapheme—sound association and whole word-pronunciation asssociation to pronounce the written word. It is concluded that pronunciation and comprehension skills are two dissociable components of the reading process and that they follow separate courses of development. Case studies presented in this paper suggest that these two components can be affected independent of each other resulting in different types of reading disabilities. It is concluded that answer to the question whether poor readers are also deficient in language comprehension depends on the type of disabled readers investigated even though educational experience and severity of the reading problem can act as confounding factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this paper, phrases such as \ldword reading\rd, \ldpronunciation\rd, and \rdreading aloud\rd are used interchangeably to refer to the ability to read aloud the written word. The term \lddecoding\rd is used when reading aloud is accomplished by applying spelling-to-sound rules.
References
AaronP. G. 1989. Dyslexia and Hyperlexia: Diagnosis and Management of Developmental Reading Disabilities. Dordrecht and Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Aaron, P. G., and Simurdak, J. in press. Reading disorders: Their nature and diagnosis. In J. E. Obrzut and G. W. Hynd (eds.). Neuropsychological Foundations of Learning Disabilities: A handbook of Issues, Methods, and Practice. Orlando, FL.: Academic Press.
Aaron, P. G., and Simurdak, J. 1989. Differential diagonsis of reading disabilities without using IQ tests. Blumberg Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Special Education. Indiana State University, Terre Haute. Unpublished manuscript.
AaronsonD., and FerresS. 1984. The word-by-word reading paradigm: An experimental and theoretical approach. In D. E.Kieras and M. A.Just (Eds.). New Methods in Reading Comprehension Hillsdale NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
AquinoM. R. 1969. The validity of the Miller-Coleman readability scale. Reading Research Quarterly, 4, 342–357.
BergerN. 1978. Why can't Johnny read? Perhaps he is not a good listener. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 633–638.
CalfeeR. C., VenezkyR. L., and ChapmanR. S. 1969. Pronunciation of synthetic words with predictable and unpredictable letter-sound correspondences. Technical Report No. 11, Research and Developmental Center, Madison, The University of Wisconsin.
CampbellR., and ButterworthB. 1985. Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in a highly literate subject: A developmental case with associated deficits of phonemic processing and awareness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 435–475.
CarrollJ. B., DaviesP., and RichmanB. 1971. Word Frequency Book. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Conners, F. A., and Olson, R. K. in press. Reading comprehension in dyslexic and normal readers: A component-skills analysis. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores De Arcais, and K. Rayner (eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
ColtheartM., DavelaarE., JonassonJ. T., and BesnerD. 1977. Access to the internal lexicon. in S.Dornic, (Ed.), Attention and Performance, VI, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
CossuG., and MarshallJ. C. 1990. Are cognitive skills a prerequisite for learning to read and write? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 21–40.
CrainS. 1989. Why poor readers misunderstand spoken sentences? In D.Shankweiler and I. Y.Liberman (Eds.). Phonology and reading disability. Ann Arbor, MI.: Univ. of Michigan Press.
CurtisM. E. 1980. Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(5), 656–669.
Dejerine, M. 1892. Des differentes varietes de cecite verbale. Memoires de la Societe de Biologie, February, 1–30.
FrithU., and SnowlingM. 1983. Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 329–342.
FunnellE. 1983. Phonological processes in reading: New evidence from acquired dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 159–180.
FunnellE., and DavisonM. 1989. Lexical capture: A developmental disorder of reading and spelling. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 471–487.
GoldbergT. E., and RothermelR. D. 1984. Hyperlexic children reading. Brain, 107, 759–785.
HermelinB., and O'ConnorN. 1986. Idiot savant calendrical calculators: Rules and regularities. Psychological Medicine, 16, 1–9.
HurstL. C., and MulhallD. J. 1988. Another calendar savant. British Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 274–277.
JormA. F. 1983. The Psychology of Reading and Spelling Disabilities. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
KintschW., and KozminskyE. 1977. Summarizing stories after reading and listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 491–499.
LaBergeD., and SamuelsS. J. 1974. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
LyttonW. W., and BrustC. M. 1989. Direct dyslexia. Brain, 112, 583–594.
MannV. 1986. Why some children encounter learning problems: The contribution of difficulties with language processing and phonological sophistication in early reading disability. In J. K.Torgesen and B. L.Young (Eds.). Psychological and Educational Perspectives on Learning Disabilities. Orlando, FL.: Academic Press.
MillerG. R., and ColemanE. B. 1967. A set of thirty-six passages calibrated for complexity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 6, 851–854.
MonroeM. 1932. Children Who Cannot Read. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
MorganW. P. 1896. A case of congenital word-blindness. British Medical Journal. 2, 1368.
NewcombeR., and MarshallJ. C. 1981. On psycholinguistic classifications of the acquired dyslexias. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 31, 29–46.
PalmerJ., McCleodC. M., HuntE., and DavidsonJ. 1985. Information processing correlates of reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 59–88.
PattersonK. 1981. Neuropsychological approaches to the study of reading. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 151–174.
PenneyC. G. 1989. Modality effects in delayed recall and recognition: Vision is better than auditory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (Human experimental psychology), 41A(3), 455–470.
RoyerJ. M., KulhavyR. W., LeeJ. B., and PetersonS. E. 1986. The sentence verification technique as a measure of listening comprehension. Educational and Psychological Research, 6, 299–313.
SchwartzM. F., SaffranE. M., and MarinO. S. M. 1980. Fractionating the reading process in dementia: Evidence for word-specific print-to-sound associations. In M.Coltheart, K.Patterson, and J. C.Marshall (Eds). Deep dyslexia, London; Roultledge & Kegan Paul.
SeymourP. H. 1986. Cognitive analysis of dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
ShalliceT., WarringtonE. K., and McCarthyR. 1983. Reading without semantics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 111–138.
StanovichK. E., 1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407.
WijkA. 1966. Rules of Pronunciation for the English Language: An Account of the Relationship Between English Spelling and Pronunciation. London: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aaron, P.G., Frantz, S.S. & Manges, A.R. Dissociation between comprehension and pronunciation in dyslexic and hyperlexic children. Read Writ 2, 243–264 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257974
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257974