Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pointing accuracy and arm movement kinematics of six human subjects were measured in three conditions where the hand was never visible during the ongoing movement: (1) in the dark; (2) the static hand was seen in peripheral vision prior to target presentation, but not during the reaction time (H−T); (3) the static hand was seen in peripheral vision until movement onset (H+T). It was shown that: (1) viewing the hand prior to movement decreased pointing variability as compared to the dark condition. (2) Viewing simultaneously hand and target (H+T) further decreased pointing variability as compared to the H−T condition. This effect was proportional to the reaction time. (3) A lengthening of the deceleration phase was observed for movements performed in the H + T condition, as compared to the other two conditions. (4) A negative correlation between variability and the first part of the deceleration phase was observed in the H + T condition, but neither in the H-T condition nor in the dark. These results suggest that the decrease in pointing variability observed in the H + T condition is due to a feedback based on kinesthetic reafference. Better encoding of the initial position of the hand relative to the target (as in H + T) would allow a calibration of arm position sense, which is used to drive the hand toward the target during the deceleration phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowditch HP, Southard WF (1880) A comparison of sight and touch. J Physiol 3:232–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossom J (1974) Movement without proprioception. Brain Res 71:285–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D (1988) The influence of visual target and limb information on manual aiming. Can J Psychol 42:57–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D, Carson RG, Goodman D, Chua R (1991) Discrete vs. continuous control of manual aiming. Hum Mov Sci 10:393–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favilla M, Henning W, Ghez C (1989) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. VI Independant specification of responses amplitude and direction. Exp Brain Res 75:280–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk JD, Goodale MA (1989) The effects of instructions to subjects on the programming of visually directed reaching movements. J Mot Behav 21:5–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Massey JT (1981) Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. J Neurophysiol 46:725–743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Christakos CN, Cooper SE (1990) Roles of proprioceptives input in the programming of arm trajectories. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 60:837–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves RE, Jones BS (1990) Conscious visual perceptual awareness vs. non-conscious visual spatial localization examined with normal subjects using possible analogues of blindsight and neglect. Cognit Neuropsychol 9:487–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1988) The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1991) The interaction of visual and proprioceptive cues in controlling reaching movements. In: Humphrey DR, Freund HJ (eds) Motor control: concepts and issues. Wiley & Sons, pp 277–291

  • Jeannerod M, Prablanc C (1983) The visual control of reaching movements. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Motor control mechanisms in man. Raven, New York, pp 13–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele SW (1981) Behavioural analysis of movement. In: Brooks VB (ed) Motor control (Handbook of Physiology, Sect 1. The nervous system, vol II, part 2) Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore pp 1391–1414

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp HD, Taub, Berman AJ (1963) Movements made in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Exp Neurol 7:305–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larish DD, Volp CM, Wallace SA (1984) An empirical note on attaining a spatial target after distorting the initial conditions of movement via muscle vibration. J Mot Behav 15:15–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Dugas C, Liske D, Eckmeier B (1987) Three dimensional movement trajectories in Fitt's task: implications for control. Q J Exp Psychol [A] 39:629–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Ducas C (1987) Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 41:365–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mather JA, Fisk JD (1985) Orienting to targets by looking and pointing: parallels and interactions in ocular and manual performance. Q J Exp Psychol [A] 37:315–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner TE, Ijaz MM (1990) The effect of accuracy constraints on three-dimensional movement kinematics. Neuroscience 35:365–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J, Brouchon M (1968) Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In: Freedman SJ (ed) The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior Dorsey, Homewood, Ill, pp 37–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J, Brouchon M (1974) A proprioceptive contribution to the spatial encoding of position cues for ballistic movements. Brain Res 71:273–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Nissen MJ, Ogden WC (1978) Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In : Pick A, Saltzman E (eds) Modes of perceiving and processing information. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 137–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Prablanc C, Martin O (1992) Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 67:455–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prablanc C, Echallier JF, Jeannerod M, Komilis E (1979) Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target. II. Static and dynamic visual cues in the control of hand movement. Biol Cybern 35:183–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redon C, Hay L, Velay JC (1991) Proprioceptive control of goal-directed movements in man, studied by means of vibratory muscle tendon stimulation. J Mot Behav 23:101–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell JC, Traub MM, Day BL, Obeso JA, Thomas PK, Marsden CD (1982) Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain 125:515–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanes JN, Mauritz KH, Dalakas MC, Evarts EV (1985) Motor control in humans with large-fiber sensory neuropathy. Hum Neurobiol 4:101–114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT (1979) Motor-output variability: a theory for for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 86:415–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweickert (1992) Information, time, and the structure of mental events: a twenty-five-year review. In: Meyer DA, Kornblum K (eds) Attention and performance XIV. Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 709–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Marriott AM (1982) Vision and proprioception in simple catching. J Mot Behav 14:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF (1984) Effect of target size on spatial and temporal characteristics of a pointing movement in man. J Neurosci 1:710–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taub E, Berman AJ (1968) Movement and learning in the absence of sensory feedback. In: Freedman SJ (ed) The neurophysiology of spatially oriented behavior. Dorsey, Homewood, Ill., pp 173–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub E, Goldberg IA, Taub P (1975) Deafferentation in monkeys: pointing at a target without visual feedback. Exp Neurol 46:178–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meulen JHP, Gooskens RHJM, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM, Wihelm K (1990) Mechanisms underlying accuracy in fast goal-directed arm movements in man. J Mot Behav 22 (1): 67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wann JP, Ibrahim SF (1992) Does limb proprioception drift? Exp Brain Res 91:162–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wing AM (1992) The uncertain motor system: perspectives on the variability of movement. In: Meyer DA, Kornblum K (eds) Attention and performance XIV. Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 709–744

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rossetti, Y., Stelmach, G., Desmurget, M. et al. The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability. Exp Brain Res 101, 323–330 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228753

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228753

Key words

Navigation